Re: HIV+ blood for a #25 red filter? Why not!

I appreciate that, (I think). David Savage wrote: > If it helps, know that I don't take you seriously. > > Ever. > > Cheers, > > Dave :-) > > > At 12:42 PM 9/04/2008, P. J. Alling wrote: > >> Once again answering my own post, if you think I take myself too >> seriously you haven't read my comme

Re: HIV+ blood for a #25 red filter? Why not!

Perhaps no one should. To paraphrase, I take pictures I like, if someone else likes them, that's their problem. Brendan MacRae wrote: > If you don't take your work seriously, why should > anyone else? > > -Brendan > --- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> If my titles aren't a s

Re: HIV+ blood for a #25 red filter? Why not!

If it helps, know that I don't take you seriously. Ever. Cheers, Dave :-) At 12:42 PM 9/04/2008, P. J. Alling wrote: >Once again answering my own post, if you think I take myself too >seriously you haven't read my commentaries on my own work. > > > If my titles aren't a simple descriptions, th

Re: HIV+ blood for a #25 red filter? Why not!

Once again answering my own post, if you think I take myself too seriously you haven't read my commentaries on my own work. > If my titles aren't a simple descriptions, they're at least tinged with > irony, sometimes outright parody. Geez > It's seldom if ever that I take a photo that I co

Re: HIV+ blood for a #25 red filter? Why not!

If you don't take your work seriously, why should anyone else? -Brendan --- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If my titles aren't a simple descriptions, they're > at least tinged with > irony, sometimes outright parody. Geez > It's seldom if ever that I take a photo that I > cons

Re: HIV+ blood for a #25 red filter? Why not!

If my titles aren't a simple descriptions, they're at least tinged with irony, sometimes outright parody. Geez It's seldom if ever that I take a photo that I consider particularly serious and then it's not my statement, it's simply recording what's there. I looked at Belger's work, he's st

Re: HIV+ blood for a #25 red filter? Why not!

--- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hate to answer my own post, but obviously you > haven't paid much > attention to the titles I choose for my own > photography. You've got me there. It's very hard > for me to take someone such as Belger as seriously > as he apparently > take

Re: HIV+ blood for a #25 red filter? Why not!

I hate to answer my own post, but obviously you haven't paid much attention to the titles I choose for my own photography. It's very hard for me to take someone such as Belger as seriously as he apparently takes himself. P. J. Alling wrote: > Your point? > > Brendan MacRae wrote: > >> One

Re: HIV+ blood for a #25 red filter? Why not!

Your point? Brendan MacRae wrote: > One thing's for sure, you've elevated flippancy to an > art form. > > -Brendan > --- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Alright I take it back, his art isn't a gimmick, his >> photography is. >> >> Brendan MacRae wrote: >> >>> I wouldn't sa

Re: HIV+ blood for a #25 red filter? Why not!

One thing's for sure, you've elevated flippancy to an art form. -Brendan --- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alright I take it back, his art isn't a gimmick, his > photography is. > > Brendan MacRae wrote: > > I wouldn't say pinhole photography is considered > less > > or more "arty"

Re: HIV+ blood for a #25 red filter? Why not!

Like I said, you may not buy into it... I would classifiy this guy as perhaps more "artist" than "photographer." I like it because it's provocative. And the cameras are pretty cool, I mean, skulls and dragonflies? Bizarre. -Brendan --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know if

Re: HIV+ blood for a #25 red filter? Why not!

Alright I take it back, his art isn't a gimmick, his photography is. Brendan MacRae wrote: > I wouldn't say pinhole photography is considered less > or more "arty" than any other. But, as Belger > explains, he believes pinhole photography is a more > organic way to capture images. In fact, it's ce

Re: HIV+ blood for a #25 red filter? Why not!

I don't know if it's more "organic." That sounds like a bit of peace, love and wampum lake nonsense to me. Like other forms of photography, it's fun. He should leave it at that. Paul On Apr 8, 2008, at 9:56 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote: > I wouldn't say pinhole photography is considered less > or m

Re: HIV+ blood for a #25 red filter? Why not!

I wouldn't say pinhole photography is considered less or more "arty" than any other. But, as Belger explains, he believes pinhole photography is a more organic way to capture images. In fact, it's central to his idea of what he's trying to do in his art; connect with the subject on a deeper level.

Re: HIV+ blood for a #25 red filter? Why not!

P. J. Alling wrote: > I don't know, sometimes mediocre photography, made into art by pinhole > cameras that are mostly gimmicks. The question is would anyone take a > second look if he used a Quaker Oats container, > , or a cigar box, >

Re: HIV+ blood for a #25 red filter? Why not!

I don't know, sometimes mediocre photography, made into art by pinhole cameras that are mostly gimmicks. The question is would anyone take a second look if he used a Quaker Oats container, , or a cigar box,

HIV+ blood for a #25 red filter? Why not!

Ok, so this is a photography/camera related website so it's not OT...really. It is, however, one of the most interesting and provocative photo sites I've ever seen. This guys takes his commitment to his subject to a totally different level... http://www.boyofblue.com/cameras.html Some of the sub

Re: #25 Red Filter ???

In a message dated 2/7/2002 6:58:43 PM US Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > In my quest to be more creative in my > photography i plan on experimenting with > filters and some IR film soon.I bought a Tiffen > #25 red today and have a procedure question.The > book says to op

#25 Red Filter ???

i all.In my quest to be more creative in my photography i plan on experimenting with filters and some IR film soon.I bought a Tiffen #25 red today and have a procedure question.The book says to open up 3 stops with the filter,which is fine i think i understand now which way is open up(f11 to