that only tells me how much better they would be if you processed them in
Photoshop CS.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Skofteland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: *istD Raw Converter
&g
y, June 11, 2004 7:10 PM
Subject: Re: *istD Raw Converter
> the Pentax converter works OK for small prints, and only if they need
> minimal processing.
>
> Herb
ROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: *istD Raw Converter
> There was some angst over at the dpreview site over the intentional
> hobbling of the functionality so that it (the LE version) only worked in
> 8 bits, but apparently they got so much flak over this an
the Pentax converter works OK for small prints, and only if they need
minimal processing.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 1:30 AM
Subject: Re: *istD Raw Converter
> The
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Mark Dalal wrote:
> I haven't really been playing close attention to the discussion on
> converting RAW files from the *istD. The little bit I have read has given me
> the impression that people aren't totally pleased with the Pentax converter
> and have been happier with the P
"William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The Pentax converter is just fine, although a bit of a nasty
>interface, providing you want to make prints, rather than look at
>pixels at 72 DPI.
Hear hear.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Hello Mark,
I just started playing with it a bit yesterday. I ended up
downloading the middle version, but would probably buy the LE version.
I haven't done any extensive tests yet, but the first look is
promising. It seems to be less harsh in it's sharpening and seems to
preserve subtle tones b
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Dalal"
Subject: *istD Raw Converter
> Hey Folks,
>
> I haven't really been playing close attention to the discussion on
> converting RAW files from the *istD. The little bit I have read has
given me
> the impression that
Hey Folks,
I haven't really been playing close attention to the discussion on
converting RAW files from the *istD. The little bit I have read has given me
the impression that people aren't totally pleased with the Pentax converter
and have been happier with the Photoshop CS converter. Has anyone t
9 matches
Mail list logo
