--- "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My MX came with that type of lens cap when I bought it new. Pentax,
> (and other camera manufacturers), weren't as cheep
> when it came to included accessories, once upon a time. In fact the
> stuff that he shows looks just like what came in t
On 12/1/05, David Chang-Sang, discombobulated, unleashed:
>It looked like a decent camera and I was eyeing it for about 5 seconds till
>I saw the seller's feedback - there will be other MX's that I would rather
>use than have sit on a shelf :)
I read the relevant feedback and also the feedback of
My MX came with that type of lens cap when I bought it new. Pentax,
(and other camera manufacturers), weren't as cheep
when it came to included accessories, once upon a time. In fact the
stuff that he shows looks just like what came in the box
with my Chrome MX in 1976 IIRC.
Alan Chan wrote:
x27;s highly likely the seals will be gone and the entire camera needing a
CLA to clean out the dried lubricant.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 8:31 PM
Subject: RE: [pdml] New In Box Pentax MX ...
> .. just sold on eBay for $350.00
No doubt it is not new, but mint at most. New Pentax cameras did not come with
bayonet cap like this, and the gold sticker does not peel off this way if never
been used.
=
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
___
gt; Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 7:47 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: [pdml] New In Box Pentax MX ...
>
>
> .. just sold on eBay for $350.00
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=15240&item=
> 3866322743
>
> Gotta love those cla
6 matches
Mail list logo
