There's not enough in these pictures to draw any conclusions. The 1600
shot looks pretty good. The jpeg engine is smearing a bit though, but
tons of detail is being retained. The chroma noise in the shadows
looks troubling, but that's nothing that can't be fixed in post. I
wouldn't pass any judgeme
Bill wrote:
>Lets also not forget that downsampling the 24mp image to 16mp tends to
>reduce apparent noise as well.
Not very much, though. Ctein wrote about this a couple of years ago
when 24MP full-frame cameras started to hit the market. You need about
a 50% reduction in *linear* resolution to
Link...
- Original Message -
From: Bill
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Cc:
Sent: Monday, November 4, 2013 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: 11 pages of K-3 images
On 03/11/2013 9:01 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Don't know what you're looking at. The ISO 51,200 image of a night skyline
On 03/11/2013 9:01 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Don't know what you're looking at. The ISO 51,200 image of a night skyline on
page 7 is presentable. The ISO 3200 version of the same shot shows little
noise. The ISO 1600 BW street scene on page 2 is noise free. All very
encouraging. Of course nois
Don't know what you're looking at. The ISO 51,200 image of a night skyline on
page 7 is presentable. The ISO 3200 version of the same shot shows little
noise. The ISO 1600 BW street scene on page 2 is noise free. All very
encouraging. Of course noise levels are highly dependent on rendering
tec
http://pentax.photoble.net/?s_cat01=&camera=PENTAX+K-3&lens=&act=DSP
As I suspected, you may want to hang on to your 16MP Pentax DSLRs if
high ISO noise is important to you.
--
Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listin
6 matches
Mail list logo
