Bolo wrote:
> Speed-wise I was refering more to the shorter lenses. A 1.x normal or
> short tele would be nice to have when it is darker. However, perhaps
> the DOF on such glass would be so short as to be unusable.
H, yes speedier shorter lenses would be nice - but just
Bolo wrote:
> Fast glass is also a problem in 67.
U, begging yer indulgence ...
f4 at 400mm, 600mm & 800mm cannot realisticly be
considered as "slow glass", large & expensive fer sure, tho
!8^D Bill
-
Bolo,
Well put. One thing to always consider is whether the shots that you
couldn't/didn't capture with the 67 - would they really be that good
on 35mm. For me what happens is that I think of the end result. 67
negs are so much better that I find myself wanting to shoot with
it rather than
Bill Casselberry wrote:
> Bolo wrote:
>
> > Fast glass is also a problem in 67.
>
> U, begging yer indulgence ...
>
> f4 at 400mm, 600mm & 800mm cannot realisticly be
> considered as "slow glass", large & expensive fer sure, tho
I wrote that poorly; thanks for po
4 matches
Mail list logo
