--- Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >In order to maintain harmony at home and possibly
> avoid divorce court, I
> >actually passed up an LX today. I'm starting to
> wonder if maybe a new wife
> >isn't easier to come by than an LX :-)
>
> "I'
In a message dated 1/30/01 10:58:29 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< to be output onto poly-based print material.
>
> Just kidding. :)
OR...IS...HE...??? >>
Not about the more than likely poly based or pure poly print material.
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTEC
Aaron wrote:
> Oh well...it's not like it'll matter in a few years anyways, when we're
> all shooting pictures digitally with our cybernetic implants and then
> uploading our conciousness to the Kodak Digitopolis to be output onto
> poly-based print material.
>
> Just kidding. :)
OR...IS...HE.
There's nothing inherently wrong with having your B&W film developed by a
lab. It was good enough for Cartier-Bresson.
You do, however, have to make sure it's appropriate. You have to do one of
two things: find a lab whose standardized process is appropriate for your
film and exposure preferences
TECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: January 29, 2001 2:58 PM
> Subject: Re: I think I made a Bad Mistake :(
>
> > How about the lame excuse that I would have to trade the ZX-5n
> in order to
> > get it? That would only leave me with a PZ-1p, a Spotmatic,
Whew, I was worried.
--Tom
Bill Owens wrote:
>
> In order to maintain harmony at home and possibly avoid divorce court, I
> actually passed up an LX today. I'm starting to wonder if maybe a new wife
> isn't easier to come by than an LX :-)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
"Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In order to maintain harmony at home and possibly avoid divorce court, I
>actually passed up an LX today. I'm starting to wonder if maybe a new wife
>isn't easier to come by than an LX :-)
"I'm not going to get married again. I'm just going to find a
wom
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> > I'm sorry you feel that way, Aaron.
>
> Twas sort of a joke, Shel. Thus, mister smiley --> :)
I know ... just playing it deadpan
> Your example about the beakers
> is a very good one, and obviously
> we would not be accounting for it
> if we didn't know about it.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> > I feel the need to defend my honor! :)
>
> I'm sorry you feel that way, Aaron.
Twas sort of a joke, Shel. Thus, mister smiley --> :)
> Tell me, Aaron, do you hand process? If you do, will you
> agitate the film exactly the same way I do? Will you fill and
> empt
Hi Mike,
Durst well be glad to sell you a point-source head that will
make the Leitz look like it was a soft light enlarger by
contrast. At least they can if your enlarger is one of the type
that are often used for aerial film. I guess my point is that
most enlargers can be set up for your prin
- Original Message -
From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: January 29, 2001 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: I think I made a Bad Mistake :(
>
> She's lulling you into a false sense of security. Prepare for
a world of
> hurt, buddy.
>
Ed Mathews wrote:
> But Shel, have you really, really
> looked at the film close enough to
> know for sure that what you're seeing
> is not reticulation? I've had that
> happen from minor temperature shock
> with Kodak films.
Yes, Ed ... but if it were reticulation it would be an even
At 13:29 29.1.2001 -0600, you wrote:
>> agency). I gave it to them to be souped in TMAX RS. The grain
>was even
>> WORSE than old FOMAPAN400 developed in RODINAL!
>
>Lets keep things in perspective. You are talking about T-Max.
>William Robb
Ok, perhaps I was a bit carried away? Easy on this lis
Original Message -
From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: January 29, 2001 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: I think I made a Bad Mistake :(
> How about the lame excuse that I would have to trade the ZX-5n
in order to
> get it? That would o
How about the lame excuse that I would have to trade the ZX-5n in order to
get it? That would only leave me with a PZ-1p, a Spotmatic, and the LX (if
I could talk her into it)
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Explain to the group why you should not be unsubscribed.
>
>
> Quoting Bill Owens <[EMAIL PROT
Explain to the group why you should not be unsubscribed.
Quoting Bill Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In order to maintain harmony at home and possibly
avoid divorce court, I
> actually passed up an LX today. I'm starting to
wonder if maybe a new wife
> isn't easier to come by than an LX :-)
>
In order to maintain harmony at home and possibly avoid divorce court, I
actually passed up an LX today. I'm starting to wonder if maybe a new wife
isn't easier to come by than an LX :-)
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://ww
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> For those of you who are thinking of sending your B&W to a lab,
> take heed. No one does it better than you.
I feel the need to defend my honor! :)
I have a really high opinion of our b&w capabilities here. That said,
there are always downsides to a "lab" as opposed
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: January 29, 2001 2:47 AM
Subject: Re: A Bad Mistake :(
>
> That's very true, and also universal accross countries ;(
>
> When I was doing only traditional B&W films, I got som
At 21:09 28.1.2001 -0800, you wrote:
[...]
>again will I send my negs to a lab - NEVER!
>Even my POS negatives from 30 years ago look better.
>
>For those of you who are thinking of sending your B&W to a lab,
>take heed. No one does it better than you.
>--
>Shel Belinkoff
That's very true, and
Shel wrote:
> Failing to heed my own advice, and anxious to get some TX
> processed during a busy period, I sent a couple of rolls to the
> local professional lab. Tonight I was looking at the negs
> through a loupe, getting ready for some printing, and was
> horrified at the grain I saw. I co
Mike Johnston wrote:
> There's no reason why a custom lab can't
> do a good job with B&W processing,
> but you've got to work to set it up
> so that it will work. In other words,
> do some testing just as you would if
> you were processing it yourself--match
> the film and developer, ascerta
Failing to heed my own advice, and anxious to get some TX
processed during a busy period, I sent a couple of rolls to the
local professional lab. Tonight I was looking at the negs
through a loupe, getting ready for some printing, and was
horrified at the grain I saw. I compared the lab negs to
23 matches
Mail list logo
