RE: AW: LX envy

2004-02-17 Thread Cotty
On 16/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: That's okay, Cotty, I don't much care what you think anyway. vbg ptui Them's fightin' words. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps _ Free UK Mac Ads

Re: AW: LX envy

2004-02-16 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Real pretty is a black 43mm Ltd on a black MX ;-)) Even prettier is a black 43mm Ltd mounted on a black Leica ;-) Mark Roberts wrote: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pretty is a 43mm Limited on an MX!

Re: AW: LX envy

2004-02-16 Thread Mark Roberts
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Very pretty. It's probably just because I'm so used to seeing pancakes on MXen, but somehow it just doesn't look right on the *istD. I could probably get used to it if I tried, though g Pretty is a 43mm Limited on an MX! -- Mark Roberts Photography

RE: AW: LX envy

2004-02-16 Thread frank theriault
That's okay, Cotty, I don't much care what you think anyway. vbg cheers, frank The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not telling! :-p Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) |

AW: LX envy

2004-02-15 Thread keller.schaefer
The focussing issue is separate from the 'hesitation', but both faults often come together. The wrong mirror rest position, that is causing the focussing issue is very straightforward to fix. The hesitation is far more difficult to repair. If the camera only has a slight hesitation in the shop and

AW: LX envy

2004-02-15 Thread keller.schaefer
Here is the *ist d + pancake: http://www.mynetcologne.de/~nc-kellersv2/pancake.jpg Mine is not too good wide open though. At 5,6 it is o.k. Sven -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Sonntag, 15. Februar 2004 14:58 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: AW: LX envy

2004-02-15 Thread frank theriault
] Subject: AW: LX envy Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:36:13 +0100 Here is the *ist d + pancake: http://www.mynetcologne.de/~nc-kellersv2/pancake.jpg Mine is not too good wide open though. At 5,6 it is o.k. _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new

RE: AW: LX envy

2004-02-15 Thread frank theriault
Okay, Cotty, I'll bite. What is the prettiest DSLR? curious, frank PS: your answer will be wrong, but I'd still like to know what you think... vbg The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer From: Cotty [EMAIL

Re: AW: LX envy

2004-02-15 Thread Frits Wüthrich
judgement. cheers, frank The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: AW: LX envy Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 16:06

Re: AW: LX envy

2004-02-15 Thread Fred
It's a fact, Fred. The *istD is the prettiest DSLR out there. Just like the PZ-1 is one of the ugliest SLR's ever. Just to prove that my Pentax allegiance isn't clouding my judgement. Har! Fred

Re: AW: LX envy

2004-02-15 Thread Fred
When I saw the Z-1/Z-1p in magazines, I thought it was one ugly camera too. But then the actual 3D products look okay, much better than I imagined based on some 2D images. :-) Well, I've never owned a Z1/PZ1 or a Z1p/PZ1p, but I have had a chance to play with some SFX/SF1 and SFXn/SF1n