E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
I bet they wanted to call it Light Box but discovered that name is
taken already.
So was Shadowlands, admittedly by a movie, but perhaps that was still
the reason.
You can register the same trademark as someone else as long as it's not
Mark Roberts wrote:
E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
I bet they wanted to call it Light Box but discovered that name is
taken already.
So was Shadowlands, admittedly by a movie, but perhaps that was still
the reason.
You can register the same trademark as
Gonz wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
I bet they wanted to call it Light Box but discovered that name is
taken already.
So was Shadowlands, admittedly by a movie, but perhaps that was
still the reason.
You can register the
Adobe released beta version of Lightroom - application dedicated for digital
photography workflow. Contrary to similar Apple's Application - Aperture -
it will accept much more varieties of RAW files including Pentax PEFs (just
like Camera Raw does), has much lower (reasonable) system requirements
I've been working with it a while. It is really great as a browser
for all kinds of file formats. What l like most about this first
module is the monochrome conversions, which are fast and work better
than most others I have tried. If you're on Mac, download it and
give it a try.
Bob
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Adobe released beta version of Lightroom - application dedicated for digital
photography workflow. Contrary to similar Apple's Application - Aperture -
it will accept much more varieties of RAW files including Pentax PEFs (just
like Camera Raw does), has much lower
Adam Maas wrote on 09.01.06 13:39:
It's currently importing 760 PEF's as I write this. Looks to have 2
major advantages over Aperture, it reads PEF's and it runs on older macs.
Aperture has quite strange hardware requirements. On the one side it
requires G5/1.8 GHz on the other less powerful
On Jan 9, 2006, at 7:39 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
It's currently importing 760 PEF's as I write this. Looks to have 2
major advantages over Aperture, it reads PEF's and it runs on older
macs.
You'll love it.
My only complaint is that Adobe is too damned conservative in their
public product
Bob Shell
Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:06:38 -0800
You'll love it.
My only complaint is that Adobe is too damned conservative in their public
product
names. Lightroom is an OK name, but the code name prior to release was
Shadowland,
a MUCH cooler name! I was hoping they'd keep that name.
Maybe
Bob Shell wrote:
You'll love it.
My only complaint is that Adobe is too damned conservative in their
public product names. Lightroom is an OK name, but the code name
prior to release was Shadowland, a MUCH cooler name! I was hoping
they'd keep that name.
It's partially an answer to
On 1/9/06, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll love it.
I look forward to the Windows release. From what I've read it sounds
like a cool app. And I agree, Shadowland sound much better. Mybe with
Lightroom their trying to preserve the highlights :-)
My only complaint is that Adobe is too
Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 2006, at 7:39 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
My only complaint is that Adobe is too damned conservative in their
public product names. Lightroom is an OK name, but the code name
prior to release was Shadowland, a MUCH cooler name! I was hoping
they'd
S:
Thanks for posting the link. This looks very interesting, just
finished downloading it.
Regards the product name:
Lightroom is a perfect allusion to the photographic darkroom.
Shadowland is cool but means nothing photographically. Can't say
I'm happier one way or the other ... what do
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 2006, at 7:39 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
My only complaint is that Adobe is too damned conservative in their
public product names. Lightroom is an OK name, but the code name
prior to release was Shadowland, a MUCH
Then again Lightroom is the kind of the opposite of Darkroom, which is
at least kind of clever.
Bob Shell wrote:
On Jan 9, 2006, at 7:39 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
It's currently importing 760 PEF's as I write this. Looks to have 2
major advantages over Aperture, it reads PEF's and it runs on
Or maybe to suggest moving print making out of the *darkroom*??
-P
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 2006, at 7:39 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
My only complaint is that Adobe is too damned conservative in their
public product names. Lightroom is an OK
At 09:05 AM 1/9/2006, Bob Shell wrote:
It's partially an answer to Apple's Aperture, and I love it that
Adobe is giving it away for free while Apple is trying to charge an
absurdly high price for Aperture.
This program isn't intended to remain free, is it?
I would expect Adobe to start
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:42:34PM -0500, Glen wrote:
At 09:05 AM 1/9/2006, Bob Shell wrote:
It's partially an answer to Apple's Aperture, and I love it that
Adobe is giving it away for free while Apple is trying to charge an
absurdly high price for Aperture.
This program isn't intended
On Jan 9, 2006, at 11:42 AM, Glen wrote:
Two more questions: What does this program do that Adobe Bridge,
or the Organizer in Photoshop Elements 4 won't do? Aren't these
three programs designed to do roughly the same thing?
It's a workflow/organizer/RAW editor integration. It is designed
Glen wrote:
At 09:05 AM 1/9/2006, Bob Shell wrote:
It's partially an answer to Apple's Aperture, and I love it that
Adobe is giving it away for free while Apple is trying to charge an
absurdly high price for Aperture.
This program isn't intended to remain free, is it?
I would expect Adobe
I'm looking forward to the Windows version. Sounds like a neat program ...
certainly one well worth trying.
You say it's more capable than Bridge or Organizer. Have you actually
tried it or have you reached that conclusion from the documentation and
description on the web site?
Shel
On Jan 9, 2006, at 12:27 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
You say it's more capable than Bridge or Organizer. Have you actually
tried it or have you reached that conclusion from the documentation
and
description on the web site?
I don't know anything about Organizer.
Based on the little time
I played a bit on my Mac this morning, and it's significantly more
capable than Bridge as an image management tool. I'm not really familiar
with Organizer beyond descriptions, but from them I assume that
Organizer is much like iPhoto or Picasa in capability (both of which I
have used).
On 9 Jan 2006 at 14:42, Glen wrote:
I would expect Adobe to start charging for it, after the beta period is
over. If the non-beta release version remains free, this sounds terrific.
It's a commercial product, the current release is beta that is still undergoing
significant development and
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Adobe released beta version of Lightroom - application dedicated for digital
photography workflow. Contrary to similar Apple's Application - Aperture -
it will accept much more varieties of RAW files including Pentax PEFs (just
like Camera Raw does), has much lower
On Monday, January 09, 2006, at 04:15PM, keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A warning for those who don't have Macintosh OS 10.4.3 or greater, you
cannot download the beta until you DO!
I don't know why that would be surprising. It says you need 10.4.3 on the web
page you pointed to in the
I was able to download it on a Windows machine.
I guess this once again shows the superiority of Windows LOL Just
kidding
Shel
[Original Message]
From: keith_w
A warning for those who don't have Macintosh OS 10.4.3 or greater, you
cannot download the beta until you DO!
keith
This is silly. I downloaded it on a test machine booted up with Mac
OS X v10.3.9.
It *requires* 10.4.3 to work, however.
Godfrey
On Jan 9, 2006, at 4:30 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I was able to download it on a Windows machine.
I guess this once again shows the superiority of Windows LOL
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Monday, January 09, 2006, at 04:15PM, keith_w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A warning for those who don't have Macintosh OS 10.4.3 or greater,
you cannot download the beta until you DO!
I don't know why that would be surprising. It says you need 10.4.3 on
the web
On Jan 9, 2006, at 4:37 PM, keith_w wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Monday, January 09, 2006, at 04:15PM, keith_w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A warning for those who don't have Macintosh OS 10.4.3 or greater,
you cannot download the beta until you DO!
I don't know why that would be
On Jan 10, 2006, at 3:05 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
It's partially an answer to Apple's Aperture, and I love it that
Adobe is giving it away for free while Apple is trying to charge an
absurdly high price for Aperture. And yes, it runs on older Macs.
Apple would give me a NFR copy of Aperture,
31 matches
Mail list logo
