Just thought I'd mention that I'm off to meet up with Jostein in the
fjords fjor a fjew days. Drove up to Newcastle (sorry Mike - schedule
was hectic - didn't have time to contact you and drop by!) and boarded
overnight sea ferry to Norway (26 hour trip to Bergen) with Land Rover
on car deck. Shoul
>
> From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2008/08/05 Tue AM 10:13:45 GMT
> To: pentax list
> Subject: All at sea
>
> Just thought I'd mention that I'm off to meet up with Jostein in the
> fjords fjor a fjew days. Drove up to Newcastle (sorry Mike - sch
Am joining you in your keen anticipation, especially when so capably armed.
Anxious for results. Good hunting..all!
Jack
--- On Tue, 8/5/08, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: All at sea
> To: "pentax list"
> Date
On 5/8/08, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I am sure we can accommodate all tastes.
I assume by this you mean Canon ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Excellent adventure. Looking forward to the pics.
Paul
On Aug 5, 2008, at 8:18 AM, Cotty wrote:
> On 5/8/08, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> I am sure we can accommodate all tastes.
>
> I assume by this you mean Canon ;-)
>
> --
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cotty
>
>
> ___/\__
> || (O) |
I was hoping I could join you. But I have other important business to
attend, a job intervju in Josteins territory.
Enjoy the trip,
and don't be too hard on Jostein, he is probably doing his best :-)
MaritimTim
2008/8/5 Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Just thought I'd mention that I'm off to meet up
>
> From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2008/08/05 Tue PM 12:18:57 GMT
> To: pentax list
> Subject: Re: All at sea
>
> On 5/8/08, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >I am sure we can accommodate all tastes.
>
> I assume b
That's just too many lenses, Cotty.
A 15mm, a 24-70mm and a 70-200mm is all you need.
Say hello to Jostein, whom I met in Copenhagen once, for me.
regards jens
--
Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.
On Aug 5, 2008 12:13 "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just thought I'd m
Except for the overnight on the ferry - it sounds wonderful (annsan,
scared of boats) -
Regards to Jostein - what fun you guys should have!
ann
Cotty wrote:
>Just thought I'd mention that I'm off to meet up with Jostein in the
>fjords fjor a fjew days. Drove up to Newcastle (sorry Mike - sch
2008/8/5 ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Except for the overnight on the ferry - it sounds wonderful (annsan,
> scared of boats) -
> Regards to Jostein - what fun you guys should have!
>
> ann
>
Boats are fine, as long as they don't sink :-)
--
MaritimTim
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis
>> >I am sure we can accommodate all tastes.
>>
>> I assume by this you mean Canon ;-)
>
>It's vegetarian?
What intelligence does it take to sneak up on a leaf?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 5/8/08, Jens, discombobulated, unleashed:
>That's just too many lenses, Cotty.
>A 15mm, a 24-70mm and a 70-200mm is all you need.
Two things Jens:
1. I don't shoot stills for need - I shoot for desire :)
2. You can never have too many lenses (q.v. W Robb)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
>
> From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2008/08/06 Wed AM 06:51:15 GMT
> To: pentax list
> Subject: Re: All at sea
>
> >> >I am sure we can accommodate all tastes.
> >>
> >> I assume by this you mean Canon ;-)
> >
> >It&
mike wilson wrote:
>> From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: 2008/08/06 Wed AM 06:51:15 GMT
>> To: pentax list
>> Subject: Re: All at sea
>>
>>>>> I am sure we can accommodate all tastes.
>>>> I assume by this you mean Canon ;-)
&
keith_w wrote:
>mike wilson wrote:
>
>
>>>From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Date: 2008/08/06 Wed AM 06:51:15 GMT
>>>To: pentax list
>>>Subject: Re: All at sea
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>I am sure
On Aug 5, 2008, at 6:13 AM, Cotty wrote:
> Just thought I'd mention that I'm off to meet up with Jostein in the
> fjords fjor a fjew days. Drove up to Newcastle (sorry Mike - schedule
> was hectic - didn't have time to contact you and drop by!) and boarded
> overnight sea ferry to Norway (26 hour
On 6/8/08, Doug, discombobulated, unleashed:
>so you've been pining for the fjords?
Nudge nudge, wink wink, know what I mean ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
> -Original Message-
> From: Cotty
>
> >so you've been pining for the fjords?
>
> Nudge nudge, wink wink, know what I mean ;-)
>
Say!
No!
More!
Regards, Anthony Farr
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Anthony Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Cotty
>>
>> >so you've been pining for the fjords?
>>
>> Nudge nudge, wink wink, know what I mean ;-)
>>
>
> Say!
> No!
> More!
>
Could be taken on a holiday.
Dave
> Regards, Anthony Far
Have a great time!
Jostein is an interesting and informative host. I met him for an
evening in Oslo a few years ago, and it was a thoroughly enjoyable --
and informative -- session.
Dan M
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:13 AM, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just thought I'd mention that I'm off to
And Tim should know...
Tim Øsleby wrote:
> 2008/8/5 ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Except for the overnight on the ferry - it sounds wonderful (annsan,
>> scared of boats) -
>> Regards to Jostein - what fun you guys should have!
>>
>> ann
>>
>>
>
> Boats are fine, as long as the
animals fairly close up.
And I want to do all that for about $100 (so good primes are out). And weight is a
factor. Not too heavy.
I am all at sea. I've looked at the 70-200 AF autofocus (several going on ebay). But
that would be the same as the 28-70, I might not like the feel.
A non-Pe
On Friday, December 13, 2002, at 12:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I am wondering which telephoto (to 200) or prime (to 200 or 300)
that I might get. One which I won't have to pay more than $100 for (or
much more than that). Pentax or other brand. (Don't want much, do I?)
You could loo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> You could look for an M 200/4 or the earlier and larger 200/4. You'd
> like the feel and probably like the quality better than a
> cheap zoom that goes to 200.
I'd second Dan's recommendation on the M 200/4. It's small and good.
I also use a Pentax FA 70-210/4-5.6? w
Oh, we've become so good at the ragin' DSLR debate that we can do that
on autopilot. The 200 M f4 is a nice lens and very cheap. Zooms have
their places but they just aren't enlargement sharp.
That looks like a distinct possibility (searched & found on ebay).
Thanks -- I was sort of afraid no
Hi!
I happen to have Soligor 70-222/3.5 C/D lens. I've bought it second
hand for $140. It means that in USA it would cost probably half as
much. This is excellent lens, though it is on the heavy side.
If you wish you can look in my home page for its review and some
shots. AFAIK Soligor C/D series
Hi, Boris,
I have several Soligor lenses, both m42 and k-mount, and they're okay
for what they are: inexpensive lenses to put on my bodies until I can
afford to use better. Not that they're bad lenses, especially for what
I paid.
You mentioned the C/D series, and I have a screwmount 3.5 constan
You can find a short comparison here under 200mm/f4.0
http://www.concentric.net/~smhalpin/
At 04:58 PM 12/13/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Dan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>On Friday, December 13, 2002, at 12:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> And I am wondering which telephoto (to 200) or p
28 matches
Mail list logo