I think it depends on the sample ;-). Sigma is known to have significant
sample variation :-).
Cheers.
Boris
John Whittingham wrote:
>> Sigma's are decent enough as long as they don't have electronics. If
>> they do, then worry.
>>
>> -Adam
>
> I think it depends more on the fitting IMHO, I h
> Sigma's are decent enough as long as they don't have electronics. If
> they do, then worry.
>
> -Adam
I think it depends more on the fitting IMHO, I have the 105/2.8 EX, 70-
200/2.8 EX and the 300/4 APO Macro (two of the 300's) 1.4x & 2x EX
converters, never had any trouble with any of them.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2007, at 2:36 AM, John Whittingham wrote:
>
>> I bought it for use on the MZ-3, I really liked the build and bright
>> viewfinder image it afforded. The Smegma does have the advantage of
>> diminutive size and light weight and I love the dedicated hood but
>>
> Nice shot ...
Thanks!
> Hard to say much about any lens from a low-rez web photo, but it
> looks like it does ok. I don't usually buy Sigma lenses because the
> experiences I've had with Sigma equipment have not been positive.
They are known to have problems particularly in Canon mount.
>
On Jan 27, 2007, at 2:36 AM, John Whittingham wrote:
> I bought it for use on the MZ-3, I really liked the build and bright
> viewfinder image it afforded. The Smegma does have the advantage of
> diminutive size and light weight and I love the dedicated hood but
> wish it
> was reversible. Here'
> The friend of mine from the PAW list who first bought a Pentax DS
> had the FA24/2. He sold it pretty fast because the CA wide open was
> too much of a bother ... why carry such a heavy, big lens around if
> you have have to shoot with it stopped down all the time?
I bought it for use on t
It is interesting to note each person's likes/dislikes. I sold both
my FA 24/2.0 and FA 135/2.8 because of poorer performance on my *IstD.
And then there are others who think those are great lenses. You have
to wonder if it is sample variance or just different expectations.
--
Bruce
Friday, J
On Jan 26, 2007, at 3:18 PM, John Whittingham wrote:
>>> The FA24/2, awesome from f/5.6 - F/11
>>
>> Ah yes, but it's a big lens for a f5.6 and the corners still show
>> pretty bad CA when used on DSLR bodies.
>
> I've not had much opportunity to use it on the D yet, but that's
> something to
>
John Whittingham wrote:
>> LOL, I sold my A 24f/2.8, bought on FA24/2 wasn't happy, bought
>> another, so then I had two, still wasn't happy, sold both FA24/2,
>> bought another A 24f/2.8, mostly happy now. I still don't understand
>> why the FA24/2 often gets such rave reviews.
>
>
> I'm on my s
> Yes the Smegma is a good lens optically but I've seen the helicoid
> grind to a halt in two of these units
Never came across that problem before on the manual focus ones.
> and quite a few where the focus
> scale was well out of alignment.
Assuming that the cheap lettering hadn't already worn
On 27/01/07, John Whittingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the risk of upsetting a lot of people the manual focus Smegma 24/2.8
> Superwide II is the best bang for the buck, it's usuable wide open on the
> *ist D, little vignetting on film SLR's until f/4, my A 24/2.8 could only
> just match it
> LOL, I sold my A 24f/2.8, bought on FA24/2 wasn't happy, bought
> another, so then I had two, still wasn't happy, sold both FA24/2,
> bought another A 24f/2.8, mostly happy now. I still don't understand
> why the FA24/2 often gets such rave reviews.
I'm on my second FA 24/2, wasn't happy with t
On 27/01/07, John Whittingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A alternaive is the 24. F2. I simply LOVE it. You'll never regeret getting
> > ove of these.
> > I believe it's the sharpest Petnax lens I have ever owned. It's incredibly
> > good.
>
> Indeed, that's why I sold the A 24 f/2.8
LOL, I sol
> A alternaive is the 24. F2. I simply LOVE it. You'll never regeret getting
> ove of these.
> I believe it's the sharpest Petnax lens I have ever owned. It's incredibly
> good.
Indeed, that's why I sold the A 24 f/2.8
John
---
elig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Digital
Image Studio
Sendt: 22. januar 2007 23:44
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Amazing used lens prices
Well now I'm sad that I don't have a dispensable stash of old Pentax glass:
Hard to find SMC Penta
Well now I'm sad that I don't have a dispensable stash of old Pentax glass:
Hard to find SMC Pentax-A 24mm f/2.8. Excellent
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986,
16 matches
Mail list logo
