On Nov 30, 2004, at 1:17 AM, William Robb wrote:
Ummm, I think the point is that if you need to edit the jpeg, you
should be saving it as something that isn't compressed, rather than
recompressing it.
Correct. Each time you save a jpeg, you are re-compressing it, thereby
losing more and more da
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:17:45 -0600, William Robb wrote:
> Ummm, I think the point is that if you need to edit the jpeg, you
> should be saving it as something that isn't compressed, rather than
> recompressing it.
That's true if you're using lossy compression like JPEG. If you're
using lossles
- Original Message -
From: "Powell Hargrave"
Subject: Re: An Alternative to JPEG...:PNG
At 09:46 AM 29/11/2004 , Jon Glass wrote:
Yeah, that's what I do. When I open a JPEG out of my camera, in
Photoshop, the first thing I do is save it as a TIFF.
All this does is mak
On Nov 29, 2004, at 8:28 PM, Powell Hargrave wrote:
All this does is make the file much larger. Saving as tif or psd makes
sense for images which you edit but the if the original is a jpg
archive
that. Don't edit the original jpg and re-save it.
Right, but I'm also not opening an image in PS un
At 09:46 AM 29/11/2004 , Jon Glass wrote:
>Yeah, that's what I do. When I open a JPEG out of my camera, in
>Photoshop, the first thing I do is save it as a TIFF.
All this does is make the file much larger. Saving as tif or psd makes
sense for images which you edit but the if the original is a
On Nov 29, 2004, at 3:45 PM, William Robb wrote:
Sixteen bit TIFF anyone?
Seems to work
Yeah, that's what I do. When I open a JPEG out of my camera, in
Photoshop, the first thing I do is save it as a TIFF. From there, I
keep it until I save a copy for printing, and that's when I do
sharpenin
- Original Message -
From: "Peter J. Alling"
Subject: Re: An Alternative to JPEG...:PNG
PNG format is quite interesting, but not IMHO for saving image
files. Displaying them maybe
but not saving them. PNG was primarily designed to replace GIF and
does an admirable
j
PNG format is quite interesting, but not IMHO for saving image files.
Displaying them maybe
but not saving them. PNG was primarily designed to replace GIF and does
an admirable
job of that.
Anyone who wants to get really geeky can read all about PNG here:
http://www.libpng.org/
Jerry in Housto
Jerry in Houston wrote:
http://0utpatient.home.comcast.net/noartifacts/
My son pointed out this format for saving image
files. I thought it was very interesting.
Jerry in Houston
An interesting expose!
However, as with most image manipulation schemes, an image format such
as .png is useful on
Jerry in Houston wrote:
http://0utpatient.home.comcast.net/noartifacts/
My son pointed out this format for saving image
files. I thought it was very interesting.
I think that article misses the point - JPEG was not designed for images
with large areas of monotonous colour and sharp edges, it w
http://0utpatient.home.comcast.net/noartifacts/
My son pointed out this format for saving image
files. I thought it was very interesting.
Jerry in Houston
11 matches
Mail list logo
