Hi,
Alan Kerr wrote:
>
> >Btw, does anyone think the name "konica minolta" looks stupid? Are
> they really going to make it the final product? :-o
>
> awful isn't it. I wonder how long it will be till the Minolta part is
> dropped and they will just be Konica. How could anyone say they are a
>
The Minolta Maxxum 7 isn't all that big of a camera actually. I assume the
M7D is about the same size as it's based on the M7. But at least the film
version was quite a bit heavier and larger then the *istD is. Bigger and
heavier is better as far as I'm concerned though.
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Kerr"
Subject: Re: And then then came minolta
> I just read up the history of Konica and change my
views, I'd be proud
> to own a Konica
>
> http://hometown.aol.com/amfoto6/amfoto6_010.htm
Unfortunately, I expect that they
nses. I'm sure Pentax
will follow suit. It is a shame it can't be done with film cameras as
it
is achieved by moving the sensor and they would have to move the film
plane in our 35mm SLR's
Alan
William Robb wrote:
>----- Original Message -
>From: "Rob Brigham&quo
But based on facts or loyality?
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
usually they are quick to defend Pentax when the need arises.
_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=fea
Apparently the Hexanon lenses are very good indeed.
So I have heard. Konica made some very nice lenses but dropped the SLR
market for some reason.
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
_
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mai
ere's more then one traitor here!
-Original Message-
From: Alan Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 2:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: And then then came minolta
sorry thought that was going to my Minolta group :(
Alan Kerr wrote:
They can call i
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Kerr"
Subject: Re: And then then came minolta
> awful isn't it. I wonder how long it will be till the
Minolta part is
> dropped and they will just be Konica. How could anyone
say they are a
> proud Konica owner :-(
A fello
- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Brigham"
Subject: And then then came minolta
With in body anti-shake (to get back on topic, this will
show Pentax
that it is possible - and that perhaps they do not need
to look at IS
lenses anymore)...
http://www.dpreview.com/news
Yes it does. Yes it will. Does anyone find it ironic that Konica left the SLR
market years ago and bought Minolta, who always had a better reputation and
larger
customer base to get back in.
At 09:03 PM 2/12/04, you wrote:
Anything is possible, but the question is, "Will Pentax do it in the nea
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, William Robb wrote:
> From: "Rob Brigham"
> > With in body anti-shake (to get back on topic, this will
> show Pentax
> > that it is possible - and that perhaps they do not need
> to look at IS
> > lenses anymore)...
> >
> >
> http://www.dpreview.com/news/0402/04021220maxxum7dig
>Btw, does anyone think the name "konica minolta" looks stupid? Are
they really going to make it the final product? :-o
awful isn't it. I wonder how long it will be till the Minolta part is
dropped and they will just be Konica. How could anyone say they are a
proud Konica owner :-(
Alan
Alan
th film cameras as it
is achieved by moving the sensor and they would have to move the film
plane in our 35mm SLR's
Alan
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Brigham"
Subject: And then then came minolta
With in body anti-shake (to get back on topic, this will
13 matches
Mail list logo
