Another attempt to demonize photographers

2006-12-02 Thread Bob Shell
I find this very depressing: http://news.com.com/2100-1030_3-6139524.html Bob -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

2006-12-02 Thread Rick Womer
Our very own Taliban in the Department of Justice. Rick --- Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I find this very depressing: http://news.com.com/2100-1030_3-6139524.html Bob -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

2006-12-02 Thread Bob Shell
Be sure to click on the Google and Archive.org links on the first page to see the actual pornographic photos. http://images.google.com/images?q=%22webe%20web%22 http://web.archive.org/web/20050411170128/www.bsmmodeling.com/115.html This ought to be one big joke, but I'm sure nobody in the

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

2006-12-02 Thread Paul Sorenson
If they really want to target child exploitation, how about starting the the kiddie beauty pageants -P Rick Womer wrote: Our very own Taliban in the Department of Justice. Rick --- Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I find this very depressing:

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

2006-12-02 Thread Cotty
On 2/12/06, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed: I find this very depressing: http://news.com.com/2100-1030_3-6139524.html If you're going to play with fire, you've got to expect to get burned now and again. Seems harsh, but along with extremes of liberalism there are equally prudish

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

2006-12-02 Thread ann sanfedele
ditto :( ann Bob Shell wrote: I find this very depressing: http://news.com.com/2100-1030_3-6139524.html Bob -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

2006-12-02 Thread Brendan MacRae
Taking this a bit further... Does this mean that Britney Spears' 1999 music video for Baby One More Time is pornographic? Wasn't she 17 (a minor) when that video was shot? Are the director and crew of that video, a montage of dance in a high school with Spears dressed in a provocative school girl

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

2006-12-02 Thread Bob Shell
On Dec 2, 2006, at 1:36 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote: If they really want to target child exploitation, how about starting the the kiddie beauty pageants Yep. Here are some of the photos they busted this guy for shooting: http://images.google.com/images?q=%22webe+web%

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

2006-12-02 Thread P. J. Alling
I thought you must be ... (oh I can't say it. it's just too easy). Cotty wrote: On 2/12/06, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed: I find this very depressing: http://news.com.com/2100-1030_3-6139524.html If you're going to play with fire, you've got to expect to get burned now

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

2006-12-02 Thread P. J. Alling
In the US, in fact I'd say North America generally, the phrase for the children , seems to have become magic words to use to trample liberties, pass and enforce laws of dubious merit, and extract money from peoples wallets and bank accounts with little or no anesthesia, not matter the what the

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

2006-12-02 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: P. J. Alling Subject: Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers In the US, in fact I'd say North America generally, the phrase for the children , seems to have become magic words to use to trample liberties, pass and enforce laws of dubious merit

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

2006-12-02 Thread Adam Maas
William Robb wrote: - Original Message - From: P. J. Alling Subject: Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers In the US, in fact I'd say North America generally, the phrase for the children , seems to have become magic words to use to trample liberties, pass and enforce

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

2006-12-02 Thread Bob Shell
On Dec 2, 2006, at 4:25 PM, Adam Maas wrote: Actually we do have a first ammendment equivalent, however there is one exception in ours, 'Hate Speech', which is sadly a constitutional exception. So I can't say I hate people who hate others if I move to Canada? Bob -- PDML

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

2006-12-02 Thread Adam Maas
Bob Shell wrote: On Dec 2, 2006, at 4:25 PM, Adam Maas wrote: Actually we do have a first ammendment equivalent, however there is one exception in ours, 'Hate Speech', which is sadly a constitutional exception. So I can't say I hate people who hate others if I move to Canada? Bob

Re: Another attempt to demonize photographers

2006-12-02 Thread Paul Stenquist
That's outrageous. I'm going to write my congressman. I'm fairly conservative on most issues, but this is ludicrous. Why don't they go after real child pornographers? I can't believe it. We should all respond to this. Paul On Dec 2, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Bob Shell wrote: I find this very