Wed Jun 11 19:05:28 EDT 2014
Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Mark Roberts
postmaster at robertstech.com wrote:
My Spousal Unit watches true-crime shows on TV, and the law
enforcement officers they interview are apparently paid by the
syllable. My favorite redundancy
My Spousal Unit watches true-crime shows on TV, and the law
enforcement officers they interview are apparently paid by the
syllable. My favorite redundancy from this evening's episode: It
tested positive for male semen.
Technically, sperm that carries a Y chromosome could be said to be
male
Thank you, for the interesting document.
Well, the Press Release you referenced is full of ... puffing up the
cheaks.
Together, both partners have a combined history of 146 years in
the Photo Industry.
Along those lines, PDML has combined photographic experience of over
500 years!
Does that
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
Thank you, for the interesting document.
Well, the Press Release you referenced is full of ... puffing up the
cheaks.
Together, both partners have a combined history of 146 years in
the Photo Industry.
Along those
Apart from the lack of meaning in the sentence quoted, it includes one of those
strange repetitive and redundant turns of phrase which really grates on my
nerves. “Together, both partners have a combined history…”
Lets deconstruct that. If they have a combined history of whatever, then it
Stan, yes, I saw that but decided that I shouldn't be too picky. :-)
Back when I was a kid, there was a very popular program Radio-Nanny.
They were discussing a bunch of different things, but occasionally they
were discussing some grammar questions in a funny way.
One time there was this
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Stanley Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
Apart from the lack of meaning in the sentence quoted, it includes one of
those strange
repetitive and redundant turns of phrase which really grates on my nerves.
“Together,
both partners have a combined
Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Stanley Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
Apart from the lack of meaning in the sentence quoted, it includes one of
those strange
repetitive and redundant turns of phrase which really grates on my nerves.
Together,
both
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
My Spousal Unit watches true-crime shows on TV, and the law
enforcement officers they interview are apparently paid by the
syllable. My favorite redundancy from this evening's episode: It
tested positive for male
Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
My Spousal Unit watches true-crime shows on TV, and the law
enforcement officers they interview are apparently paid by the
syllable. My favorite redundancy from this evening's episode: It
tested
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Stanley Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
A simple straightforward phrasing would be: “The partners have a
combined history…” If they are going to write meaningless twaddle,
at least they could avoid bad writing.
Consider the source. The kind of folks
You would miss the half the joy of deconstruction, in that case.
On 6/11/2014 5:32 PM, Stanley Halpin wrote:
Apart from the lack of meaning in the sentence quoted, it includes one of those
strange repetitive and redundant turns of phrase which really grates on my
nerves. “Together, both
On 6/11/2014 6:46 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Stanley Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
Apart from the lack of meaning in the sentence quoted, it includes one of those
strange
repetitive and redundant turns of phrase which really grates on my nerves.
On 11/06/2014 1:36 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Along those lines, PDML has combined photographic experience of over
500 years!
Given the age of most of us, I suspect you could safely at a zero to
that number.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I was going to buy some inks and some Ilford Pearl paper, but found
that the latter is discontinued (on Atlex, and everywhere else, at least
in 5x7).
So, I called Atlex, and they told me that Ilford (as a company, not just
paper) is no more: it closed about a month ago.
So, if you want to buy
Igor Roshchin wrote:
I was going to buy some inks and some Ilford Pearl paper, but found
that the latter is discontinued (on Atlex, and everywhere else, at least
in 5x7).
So, I called Atlex, and they told me that Ilford (as a company, not just
paper) is no more: it closed about a month ago.
Tue Jun 10 13:11:52 EDT 2014
Mark Roberts wrote:
Igor Roshchin wrote:
I was going to buy some inks and some Ilford Pearl paper, but found
that the latter is discontinued (on Atlex, and everywhere else, at
least
in 5x7).
So, I called Atlex, and they told me that Ilford (as a
Igor -
Red River Paper sells three different versions of satin/pearl paper.
Here's a comparison of the three from their web site.
http://tinyurl.com/63x4phr
They also have a Pearl Metallic...
http://tinyurl.com/2c3hck2
-p
On 6/10/2014 12:35 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Tue Jun 10 13:11:52
:-(
thanks for the heads up
ann - Ilford and Oriental were my papers of choice back in my film
days.. and the Ilford High gloss ink jet stuff - so sorry to hear this
ann
On 6/10/2014 12:30, Igor Roshchin wrote:
I was going to buy some inks and some Ilford Pearl paper, but found
that the
Paul,
Thank you for the reference to the RR papers.
Actually, right around the moment I was sending the message to PDML,
I was checking your previous response to my quesiton about metallic
papers, and checked out RR website for the pearl papers.
I saw those satin papers.
I am tempted to try
Note that it is the digital company Ilford Imaging Switzerland that went under,
not the analog business in the UK which is Harman Technology. Both use the
Ilford brand name but they aren't otherwise connected. Ironically the digital
business was what was thought to be the profitable half when
Harman, the company that bought the Ilford BW film and paper business,
seems to be going strong. So it's just the company specializing in as
inkjet papers based in Switzerland that has gone belly up.
On 6/10/2014 12:30 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
I was going to buy some inks and some Ilford
Speaking of Harmon, makers of Ilford Photosensitive materials, they
apparently also make Inkjet materials, which includes this,
http://www.harman-inkjet.com/products/product.asp?n=85t=HARMAN+CRYSTALJET+ELITE
in a Pearl finish.
On 6/10/2014 12:30 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
I was going to buy
Ilford here? Ilford Where? Before we all know it, this Ilford mess will
be as big as Aspirin, Nylon and the rest of that whole trademark imbroglio.
As if that were not enough, here is the press release from C.R. Kennedy,
mis-branded or mis-identified wrongly in another presser as C.R. K.
24 matches
Mail list logo
