I'm shooting with a 45 CL-3 handle mount Metz. No problems with it.
Just set it to one of the auto settings and the camera to match.
--
Bruce
Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:55:20 AM, you wrote:
WB> On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:08:08AM +0200, Jens Bladt wrote..
>> Good you are finally out of the hosp
And a translation for those of use who only understand the metric system :-)
DA 16-45 = 280.7g (9.9 oz)
DA* 16-50 = 564.1g (19.9 oz)
DA 50-200 = 260.8g (9.2 oz)
DA* 50-135 = 686.1g (24.2 oz) (Keep in mind that the FA* 80-200 f2.8 weighs
in at 1510g)
Cheers,
Dave
At 11:46 AM 18/05/2007, Stan
DA 16-45 = 9.9 oz
DA* 16-50 = 19.9 oz
DA 50-200 = 9.2 oz
DA* 50-135 = 24.2 oz
On May 17, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Thibouille wrote:
> 2007/5/17, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>
>> K10D + grip + two batteries + FA80-200/2.8 = 2.5kg, not a great
>> advantage to Pentax these days.
>>
> Sure
- Original Message -
From: "Digital Image Studio"
Subject: Re: Any one regret upgrading to the K10D?
> Oh, I thought we were talking about real lenses for real cameras ;-) (
> <---see the smiley)
I'm waiting to see what the new F/2.8 zooms weigh in at.
Willi
On 18/05/07, Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/5/17, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >
> > K10D + grip + two batteries + FA80-200/2.8 = 2.5kg, not a great
> > advantage to Pentax these days.
> >
> Sure Rob, but those are "old metal models" which are replaced by
> plastic DA
2007/5/17, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> K10D + grip + two batteries + FA80-200/2.8 = 2.5kg, not a great
> advantage to Pentax these days.
>
Sure Rob, but those are "old metal models" which are replaced by
plastic DA + SDM. What is the weight of the equivallent lens (DA*
50-135)? 9
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 09:25:11AM -0600, William Robb wrote..
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Wilko Bulte"
> Subject: Re: SV: Any one regret upgrading to the K10D?
>
>
>
> >> I routinely use a Metz 60 CT-2 with my cameras.
> >
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Wilko Bulte"
Subject: Re: SV: Any one regret upgrading to the K10D?
>> I routinely use a Metz 60 CT-2 with my cameras.
>
> That sounds promising. But given that the K10D is my father's I would
> like
> to know what Pent
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 08:47:58AM -0600, William Robb wrote..
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Wilko Bulte"
> Subject: Re: SV: Any one regret upgrading to the K10D?
>
>
>
> >
> > What Metz models? The old ones have a rather high sync
- Original Message -
From: "Wilko Bulte"
Subject: Re: SV: Any one regret upgrading to the K10D?
>
> What Metz models? The old ones have a rather high sync voltage. What can
> the
> Pentax DSLR handle, especially the K10D?
>
I routinely use a Metz 60 CT-2
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:08:08AM +0200, Jens Bladt wrote..
> Good you are finally out of the hospital, Larry.
> Yes - these old TTL only flashes are useless with the K10D. There's not even
> a sensor in that flash.
> Ii use old Metz flashes with a sensor. They work great. But I do miss TTL
What
original
De: Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Enviado: jueves, 17 de mayo, 2007 5:58:55
Asunto: Re: Any one regret upgrading to the K10D?
Well, yes, it helps, I cannot deny that.
It is just that I think SR contributes significantly to the size of
camer
Emne: Re: Any one regret upgrading to the K10D?
On 5/17/07, Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My only regret is that the zoom ring is kinda hard to opereate from
beneth,
> while mounted on this body.
Power Zoom Jens. It works again.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail L
85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Larry
Levy
Sendt: 16. maj 2007 19:08
Til: pdml@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Any one regret upgrading to the K10D?
Recently, I had a severe case of ARDS that left me with virtually no muscle
On 5/17/07, Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My only regret is that the zoom ring is kinda hard to opereate from beneth,
> while mounted on this body.
Power Zoom Jens. It works again.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.
EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Wilko
Bulte
Sendt: 16. maj 2007 23:30
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Any one regret upgrading to the K10D?
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:00:12PM +0100, Cotty wrote..
> On 16/5/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >As long as you don't hav
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 06:58:55AM +0300, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Well, yes, it helps, I cannot deny that.
>
> It is just that I think SR contributes significantly to the size of
> camera. I'd rather Pentax introduced more than on K10D-like models so
> that a consumer (a.k.a. me) could make thei
Larry Levy wrote:
> Recently, I had a severe case of ARDS that left me with virtually no
> muscle tone when I was allowed out of a 6 week induced coma. ...
Congratulations on surviving that ordeal, Larry!
Life is precious; those things tend to remind us of that.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
ist
> Enviado: miércoles, 16 de mayo, 2007 19:36:43
> Asunto: Re: Any one regret upgrading to the K10D?
>
> Paul, it is not a simple question.
>
> My answer is 1/2 yes and 1/2 no.
>
> 1/2 yes, because
> 1. My *istD was smaller and lighter
> 2. I don't need c
On 16/5/07, I, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>Recently, I had a severe case of ARDS that left me with virtually no
>>muscle
>>tone when I was allowed out of a 6 week induced coma. Since I had
>>virtually
>>no capability to steadily hold a camera, and more than 10 Pentax lenses, I
>>decided that
On 17/05/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 16/5/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >As long as you don't have the FA* 80-200mm f2.8 mounted (at 1.51kg).
>
> 1D = 1565 kg
> EF70-200 2.8 = 1310 kg
>
> Total weight = 2875 kg.
>
> Same as hauling over 3 and a half K10D bodies at
On 16/5/07, Wilko Bulte, discombobulated, unleashed:
>2.875 kg I hope.. ;-)
>
>Wilko
LOL.
Hey *I* knew what I meant :-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:00:12PM +0100, Cotty wrote..
> On 16/5/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >As long as you don't have the FA* 80-200mm f2.8 mounted (at 1.51kg).
>
> 1D = 1565 kg
> EF70-200 2.8 = 1310 kg
>
> Total weight = 2875 kg.
2.875 kg I hope.. ;-)
Wilko
--
PDML
On 16/5/07, Larry Levy, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Recently, I had a severe case of ARDS that left me with virtually no muscle
>tone when I was allowed out of a 6 week induced coma. Since I had virtually
>no capability to steadily hold a camera, and more than 10 Pentax lenses, I
>decided that
On 16/5/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
>As long as you don't have the FA* 80-200mm f2.8 mounted (at 1.51kg).
1D = 1565 kg
EF70-200 2.8 = 1310 kg
Total weight = 2875 kg.
Same as hauling over 3 and a half K10D bodies at once.
Ouch.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
adt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Walter
Hamler
Sendt: 16. maj 2007 03:16
Til: pdml@pdml.net
Emne: Any one regret upgrading to the K10D?
A week or so ago I was going to go out sho
s of the Pentax system...
Regards,
Jaume
- Mensaje original
De: Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Enviado: miércoles, 16 de mayo, 2007 19:36:43
Asunto: Re: Any one regret upgrading to the K10D?
Paul, it is not a simple question.
My answer is 1/2 yes
Larry -
Wasn't sure what ARDS is so I looked it up - sounds really scary. Glad
you're still with us.
-p
Larry Levy wrote:
> Recently, I had a severe case of ARDS that left me with virtually no muscle
> tone when I was allowed out of a 6 week induced coma. Since I had virtually
> no capabilit
Paul, it is not a simple question.
My answer is 1/2 yes and 1/2 no.
1/2 yes, because
1. My *istD was smaller and lighter
2. I don't need certain amount of bells and whistles of K10D has that
incur size and weight penalties.
1/2 no, because
1. K10D produces stunning images
2. K10D does have some
Recently, I had a severe case of ARDS that left me with virtually no muscle
tone when I was allowed out of a 6 week induced coma. Since I had virtually
no capability to steadily hold a camera, and more than 10 Pentax lenses, I
decided that a K100D or K10D was in my future. Coming from an *ist D,
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 08:07:55AM -0400, David J Brooks wrote:
> Try lugging around a D2H and 70-200 VR F 2.8 all day. You'll begin to
> LOVER the K10D.:-)
>
> I still have my istD as well as the K10D. I find the K10D fits very
> well in my hand, and the istD now feels to small.
I've kept my D, b
On 5/16/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "mike wilson"
> Subject: Re: Any one regret upgrading to the K10D?
>
>
>
> >>
> >> Lucy, our new cat, can send email. She just jumps on the keyboard w
I like the gmail spell checker. It just hilites the word i got right,
then everything just falls into place.:-)
Dave
On 5/16/07, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, Lucy can spell
>
> Actually Dave is the only one I know whose spelling is a bit worse than
> mine. I know it looks a lot wo
Yeah, Lucy can spell
Actually Dave is the only one I know whose spelling is a bit worse than
mine. I know it looks a lot worse, but I have 3 smell checkers on my system.
--graywolf
mike wilson wrote:
>> From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Lucy, our new cat, can send email. She just
LOL
On 5/16/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "mike wilson"
> Subject: Re: Any one regret upgrading to the K10D?
>
>
>
> >>
> >> Lucy, our new cat, can send email. She just jumps on the keyb
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: Any one regret upgrading to the K10D?
>>
>> Lucy, our new cat, can send email. She just jumps on the keyboard when
>> i'm not looking and som epoor sap, get a weird email, he things is
>>
On 5/16/07, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2007/05/16 Wed PM 12:10:25 GMT
> > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> > Subject: Re: Any one regret upgrading to the
On May 16, 2007, at 12:02 AM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
> [K10D] Wish it were at least possible to have the shutter times on the
> rear wheel in M mode.
Funny ... I hadn't really noticed that I can't customize the edials
in M mode... !
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
>
> From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/05/16 Wed PM 12:10:25 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: Any one regret upgrading to the K10D?
>
> On 5/16/07, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> &g
Fixed, like the cat.:-)
Dave
On 5/16/07, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/16/07, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Try lugging around a D2H and 70-200 VR F 2.8 all day. You'll begin to
> > LOVE the K10D.:-)
>
> As long as you don't have the FA* 80-200mm f2.8 mounted (at
On 5/16/07, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try lugging around a D2H and 70-200 VR F 2.8 all day. You'll begin to
> LOVER the K10D.:-)
As long as you don't have the FA* 80-200mm f2.8 mounted (at 1.51kg).
And Dave, "LOVER the K10D"? I'm pretty sure that's illegal in most
places (not on
On 5/16/07, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm just trying to get the Old Man used to a camera with buttons.
>
> My Dad's the kind of guy who can read an electrical schematic, and
> build the circuit, but try and get him to send an email & he is
> completely lost.
Lucy, our new cat, can
Try lugging around a D2H and 70-200 VR F 2.8 all day. You'll begin to
LOVER the K10D.:-)
I still have my istD as well as the K10D. I find the K10D fits very
well in my hand, and the istD now feels to small.
Dave
On 5/15/07, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded from a ist*DS to th
On 5/16/07, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I went the same route, from DS to K10D.
> I liked the DS, but it made me feel like a man at the end of a good camera.
>
> I'm not looking back. Kept both. And are still using the DS a bit. Different
> cameras for different needs and use.
> Have yo
Typo
Mostly Harmless
- Original Message -
From: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 2:33 AM
Subject: Any one regret upgrading to the K10D?
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded from a ist*DS to the K10D and act
The size of the K10D doesn't bother me in the least. I still have
one of my *istD cameras but never use it. The K10D is far superior in
so many ways, and it actually fits my hands better -- with the
battery grip.
Paul
On May 15, 2007, at 8:33 PM, Paul wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded from a ist*
No Paul, no way.
I upgraded from D -> K10. Maybe I would have kept a DS/DL/K100D but
the D had a very bad grip compared to the K10 (big hands I know). Even
with the K10, I'm better with the grip, even pulling off the battery
not to add weight.
I never regreated it. An additional cheap DL for "jus
Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I upgraded from a ist*DS to the K10D and actually kind of regret it now.
> I think i preferred the ergonomics and size of the DS. Sure the files
> are better from the K10D, but its a lot bigger and heavier to lug around.
Same here. The DS just felt like it had be
I'm just trying to get the Old Man used to a camera with buttons.
My Dad's the kind of guy who can read an electrical schematic, and
build the circuit, but try and get him to send an email & he is
completely lost.
I've told him I'll process his photos for him. Baby steps :-)
Cheers,
Dave
On 5/
On 16/05/07, Tom Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, the camera stuff, he picked up on pretty quickly, but it is the
> processing and printing that his giving him (and me) fits.
>
> I think the answer for most of his problems is called Picasa2.
Absolutely, Picasa2 still takes a little tuitio
- Original Message -
From: "Paul"
Subject: Any one regret upgrading to the K10D?
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded from a ist*DS to the K10D and actually kind of regret it now.
> I think i preferred the ergonomics and size of the DS. Sure the files
> are better fro
I intend to get a K10D sometime this year. I have every intention of
keeping my DS. If nothing else, I view it as being a camera that I can
afford to have in the car with me at all times (along with a nice
assortment of good but old glass courtesy of eBay), and afford to have
stolen, destroyed,
That is where my DL went when I got my new/old stock DS body in
February. Dad has been climbing a rather steep learning curve these past
few months, and it has been trying my patience at least as much as his. :-)
Oh, the camera stuff, he picked up on pretty quickly, but it is the
processing and
I have no regrets. And my D feels like a children's toy when I pick it up now.
I've recently given my D to my technophobe Dad. I was showing him the
basics of how to operate it the other day. That was fun :-)
:-)
Cheers,
Dave
On 5/16/07, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded f
A week or so ago I was going to go out shooting pics. Long story short I
ended up wandering around the backyard with the istDL and the 100mm Cosina
Macro. I was quickly taken by just how small the DL is compared to the K10,
now fitted with the Battery Grip. However, I still lean toward the K10
I never really end up selling the *istDS, would have gotten just 30%
of what I paid two years ago at the most, and even though the K10D is
the only camera I use regularly, I can see your point, the *istDS is
way lighter and smaller. In fact with a pancake the *istDS is going to
replace my P&S on va
I upgraded from *istD and I don't regret it at all. Size is a little
bigger, but fits my hand well. The DS was much faster at processing
the images after the shot than the D, so the overall slowness of the D
is painful to go back to - I still have one body as a backup, but am
strongly considering
Not I. The K10D is a perfect match to my hand and needs. I've kept
one of the *ist DS bodies and it does good service still for tabletop
work.
G
On May 15, 2007, at 5:33 PM, Paul wrote:
> I upgraded from a ist*DS to the K10D and actually kind of regret it
> now.
> I think i preferred the e
Hi,
I upgraded from a ist*DS to the K10D and actually kind of regret it now.
I think i preferred the ergonomics and size of the DS. Sure the files
are better from the K10D, but its a lot bigger and heavier to lug around.
Any way, just thinking out loud.
Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
59 matches
Mail list logo
