This has to be one of the most interesting aurora photos I've seen.
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=79373
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
Probably a result of trying to get both the mountains and the aurora reasonably
clear. BTW, it didn't look that bad to me on my monitor, but then again, I'm no pro .
. .
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
It looks terribly over tampered with to me, Dan.
Beautiful pictures... btw, his 50mm (85 ?) must be one heck of a
lens - I haven't noticed any trace of comma aberration towards the
edges. Possibly the pics are too small for it to show up. However,
my FA 50/1.4 at 1.4 displays huge UFOs in the corners...
Servus, Alin
DagT wrote:
Most of the time it´s a 35 f/1.4, I don´t know which brand but
obviously not Pentax.
I´ve seen prints in about 20x27cm size, they´re really good.
DagT
På tirsdag, 30. september 2003, kl. 13:14, skrev Alin Flaider:
Beautiful pictures... btw, his 50mm (85 ?) must be one heck of a
lens - I
The is an interesting shot of an aurora over the Chugatch Mountains of Alaska on
the Astronomy Picture of the Day page for September 29, 2003:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
Hmmm, very over exposed, I wonder what they are thinking, it doesn\t look like that at
all when you stand there in the middle of the night.
By the way, here an interesting page including a How to photograph auroras for
dummies and the results of a photo contest with some really great pictures:
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And here's a guy specializing in aurora photo's:
http://www.nordlysfoto.no/
...more specific address:
http://www.nordlysfoto.no/Galleri/Nordlys
By the way, his standard settings are: f/1.4, 5-10s, 400 ISO
DagT
7 matches
Mail list logo
