Re: Canon 50s compared at photo.net

2003-06-23 Thread Rüdiger Neumann
Hallo and interesting comparision, but the flare is bad on the Conon lenses. Would be a Pentax 50mm better? It would be interesting to have comparsion to a Pentax 50mm lens. regards Rüdiger Von: Evan Hanson >Over at photo.net they have a comparison of the EF 50 1.8 vs. EF 50 1.4. >IMHO both exh

Re: Canon 50s compared at photo.net

2003-06-23 Thread Frantisek Vlcek
From: Anthony Farr > Another Canonite wrote about the two 50s: "Both are great but in different > ways." I tried the 1.8/50 when I thought about switching to 10D or D60, and all samples I tried (new in shop) were very disappointing at 2/3 out field performance, and that's on a reduced (not full f

RE: Canon 50s compared at photo.net

2003-06-23 Thread tom
> -Original Message- > From: Rüdiger Neumann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hallo > and interesting comparision, but the flare is bad on the > Conon lenses. I wouldn't say it's bad, but it's not as good as SMC. > Would be a Pentax 50mm better? > It would be interesting to have comparsion t

Re: Canon 50s compared at photo.net

2003-06-23 Thread Caveman
Rüdiger Neumann wrote: Hallo and interesting comparision, but the flare is bad on the Conon lenses. Would be a Pentax 50mm better? This is the worst I ever took out of the Pentax M 50/1.4: http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/Scan9a.jpg http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/Scan13a.jpg No filter or hood.

Re: Canon 50s compared at photo.net

2003-06-23 Thread Rüdiger Neumann
Hallo, I had only flare problems with my Pentax FA 28-200 (which is a Tamron) and that will be a surprice with my 1.9/43. regards Rüdiger Von: Caveman >> and interesting comparision, but the flare is bad on the Conon lenses. >> Would be a Pentax 50mm better? > >This is the worst I ever took out o