Re: Cotty's September PUG review

2002-10-08 Thread Kenneth Waller
PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 10:16 AM Subject: Cotty's September PUG review > Well, after missing out August's venerable submissions, I thought I > better put digit to keyboard and do this month's before it becomes > history. Some bright spark suggested

Re: Cotty's September PUG review

2002-09-28 Thread harald_nancy
Hi Cotty, Thanks for taking the time to write another review, which I am always looking forward to (even if I'm not mentioned). It's an interesting analogy to compare the Painted Hills to shaved cheeks. They do look like that from a distance, with their smoothly curved surface. But from very clos

Re: Cotty's September PUG review

2002-09-27 Thread Paul Stenquist
Thanks for the kind words, Cotty. And thanks for taking the time to comment on the PUG. It's refreshing to see the discussion here turn to photography rather than "my camera company is better than yours." Bravo. Paul Cotty wrote: > > > > Jimmy and his Mom > Paul Stenquist > Great capture of a

Re: Cotty's September PUG review

2002-09-27 Thread Cotty
> Cotty wrote: > > > Vigeland Park > > Dan Matyola

Re: Cotty's September PUG review

2002-09-27 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
I was not conscious of the phallic nature of the obelisk as I was taking the picture, but it is there, of course. On the other hand, as Freud said, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. Anyone who has visited Vigeland Park knows that Vigelan was not at all shy about frankly portraying what Monty Py

Re: Cotty's September PUG review

2002-09-27 Thread WBeard
Cotty wrote: > Vigeland Park

Cotty's September PUG review

2002-09-27 Thread Cotty
Well, after missing out August's venerable submissions, I thought I better put digit to keyboard and do this month's before it becomes history. Some bright spark suggested I could easily access August on the website, and this is true. Who knows, I might get around to doing it one day. As the s