Mark Roberts wrote:
>Igor Roshchin wrote:
>
>>I even suggested a business idea for a photoshop/LR plugin that
>>would draw a large format frame around your photo, making it look as if it
>>was shot that way.
>
>I've discovered that such tools for Photoshop already exist. I've
>downloaded a collec
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:55:59PM -0500, Matthew Hunt wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
>
> > I even suggested a business idea for a photoshop/LR plugin that
> > would draw a large format frame around your photo, making it look as if it
> > was shot that way.
>
> T
On 12/12/2011 7:04 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Igor Roshchin wrote:
I even suggested a business idea for a photoshop/LR plugin that
would draw a large format frame around your photo, making it look as if it
was shot that way.
I've discovered that such tools for Photoshop already exist. I've
downlo
Igor Roshchin wrote:
>I even suggested a business idea for a photoshop/LR plugin that
>would draw a large format frame around your photo, making it look as if it
>was shot that way.
I've discovered that such tools for Photoshop already exist. I've
downloaded a collection of Brush Shapes that are
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
> I even suggested a business idea for a photoshop/LR plugin that
> would draw a large format frame around your photo, making it look as if it
> was shot that way.
This sort of thing is already done routinely. When watching (American)
footba
Wed Aug 31 19:35:50 EDT 2011
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> On Aug 31, 2011, at 6:37 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Larry Colen
> > wrote:
> >> I was contemplating that with sensors improving so quickly, that it's
> >> barely cost effective to spend the money making
On 9/1/11 22:18, Toralf Lund wrote:
On 9/1/11 0:24, Larry Colen wrote:
I think that part of the reason that the adaptall mount went out of
favor is the difficulty and complexity of doing a screw-drive
autofocus version. It's one thing to make a linkage that'll handle
f-stops, but the toleranc
On 9/1/11 0:24, Larry Colen wrote:
I think that part of the reason that the adaptall mount went out of favor is
the difficulty and complexity of doing a screw-drive autofocus version. It's
one thing to make a linkage that'll handle f-stops, but the tolerance you need
for screwdrive would be r
On Aug 31, 2011, at 11:03 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
> Wishful thinking alert: Pentax needs a system that will allow their DA*400 or
> 500mm lens to AF with a 2x extender. So, either reasonably fast glass or a
> much improved AF system that works well @f8-11 in low contrast dim light.
>
I think
Wishful thinking alert: Pentax needs a system that will allow their DA*400 or
500mm lens to AF with a 2x extender. So, either reasonably fast glass or a much
improved AF system that works well @f8-11 in low contrast dim light.
stan
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 31, 2011, at 5:24 PM, Larry Colen
On Aug 31, 2011, at 6:37 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> I was contemplating that with sensors improving so quickly, that it's barely
>> cost effective to spend the money making fast glass, to get a stop or two,
>> when sensors will give tha
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I was contemplating that with sensors improving so quickly, that it's barely
> cost effective to spend the money making fast glass, to get a stop or two,
> when sensors will give that same speed in a couple years time anyways, for a
> lot ch
I think that part of the reason that the adaptall mount went out of favor is
the difficulty and complexity of doing a screw-drive autofocus version. It's
one thing to make a linkage that'll handle f-stops, but the tolerance you need
for screwdrive would be really tough to pass through an adapta
13 matches
Mail list logo
