Re: Decent photo sites?

I'm on Smugmug as well, but a few months ago I also joined Zenfolio: http://www.zenfolio.com/ It's the same idea as Smugmug, and the pricing is similar, but I prefer the look of Zenfolio's galleries and the user interface for managing photos. My gallery is here: http://sunny16.zenfolio.com/ They

Re: Decent photo sites?

obvious. Deb in TX -- Message: 16 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:51:39 -0400 From: ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Decent photo sites? To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; for

Re: Decent photo sites?

I'll second Ann's recommendation of smugmug. It's hard to beat unlimited storage and unlimited bandwidth for $40 per year. You can get a discount code from any of the current smugmug customers and save $5. Here are the details: George S

Re: Decent photo sites?

Both my home and work connections are directly off the alter.net backbone, so I can generally assume that slower sites are either way the heck off in the internet hinterland or just slow. -Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On my service at work and at home (Comcast cable), photo.net is considera

Re: Decent photo sites?

Deb - I like smugmug a lot for a number of reasons ans photo.net for the quickly loading nicely sized thumbs... I thought I was going to move everything over to smugmug but now I think I'll keep both Smugmug has a few too many cutsey things but you can disable them - they are VERY respon

Re: Decent photo sites?

Ditto. I use flickr, because there is a very active local group (which is a good is a good source of info as to photo ops/events around town) but I find it annoyingly slow, the UI and look is a PITA. Although I'm finding the ads on photo.net getting more & more intrusive. My preference is to mak

Re: Decent photo sites?

On my service at work and at home (Comcast cable), photo.net is considerably faster than flickr. Perhaps it varies by local and/or service. I have no idea. Paul -- Original message -- From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Photo.net faster? Not here. That site is do

Re: Decent photo sites?

Photo.net faster? Not here. That site is dog slow for the most part. Flickr's speed issues have mostly been resolved when they moved into Yahoo's datacentre earlier this year. But if you do want simple, lightweight pages, photo.net delivers well, even if they do require more massaging of the JP

Re: Decent photo sites?

I refer photo.net to flicker. The cost for a full service account is the same. But the photo.net pages look much better, and the site is much faster. Paul -- Original message -- From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Flickr displays at 500px on the long side by defa

Re: Decent photo sites?

Flickr displays at 500px on the long side by default. The 'All Sizes' tab gives access to the Larg (1024px on the long side) and also (if you have a Pro account) the full size. pro accounts are $25/yr and also get you unlimited sets and images in your stream, well worth the low cost. -Adam De

Re: Decent photo sites?

Cotty wrote: > On 28/09/07, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> On 28/09/07, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed: >> >>> Check out picasaweb. It's a google service, so you'll need to sign up >>> for a gmail account. (Don't worry, Cotty. She doesn't have to use it.) >> Yeah but then

Re: Decent photo sites?

On 28/09/07, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed: >On 28/09/07, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>Check out picasaweb. It's a google service, so you'll need to sign up >>for a gmail account. (Don't worry, Cotty. She doesn't have to use it.) > >Yeah but then of course she'll have a

Re: Decent photo sites?

At 04:28 PM 28/09/2007, Cotty wrote: >On 28/09/07, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >Check out picasaweb. It's a google service, so you'll need to sign up > >for a gmail account. (Don't worry, Cotty. She doesn't have to use it.) > >Yeah but then of course she'll have a few to give

Re: Decent photo sites?

On 28/09/07, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed: >Check out picasaweb. It's a google service, so you'll need to sign up >for a gmail account. (Don't worry, Cotty. She doesn't have to use it.) Yeah but then of course she'll have a few to give away right? You Americans are so giving

Re: Decent photo sites?

60 MB! You're doing well. I only get 20 and I think that's about normal here unless you want to fork out some bucks for more. Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney, Australia http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/ http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/b

Re: Decent photo sites?

It's so cheap to get a domain name and a hosting service nowadays that doesn't have a bunch of advertising, etc, on it. Netsolutions.com and GoDaddy.com offer such service for very little money; my site, www.gdgphoto.com, essentially costs me $5 a month for web serving, ftp access, and emai

Re: Decent photo sites?

- Original Message - From: "Debra Wilborn" Subject: Decent photo sites? > I'm looking for a place to host photos. Right now I > have a few things on Flickr here: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ > > (Feedback welcome, by the way.) &g

Re: Decent photo sites?

Debra Wilborn wrote: > I'm looking for a place to host photos. Right now I > have a few things on Flickr here: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ > > (Feedback welcome, by the way.) > > It seems however that Flickr likes to resize > everything to 500 pixels. Kind of smallish. Wh

Decent photo sites?

I'm looking for a place to host photos. Right now I have a few things on Flickr here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ (Feedback welcome, by the way.) It seems however that Flickr likes to resize everything to 500 pixels. Kind of smallish. What hosting service, if any, do y'all