On Sep 16, 2005, at 11:42 AM, Barry Rice wrote:
Thanks for the speedy comments re: sensitivity. So my follow-up
question
(and then I'll try to get some work done today!)is there any
reciprocity
failure issues with digital detectors? I'd think the detection was
fairly
linear with long in
> I've found that from ISO 200 - 800 the noise levels are low enough that
> you can pick you ISO for the
> Shutter speed F stop combination you want. At 1600 noise becomes
> noticeable, and at 3200 noise is
> objectionable for any type of smooth subject matter.
I've only had my DS for a short w
As exposure lengthens the sensor heats up. As the sensor heats up noise
increases.
Barry Rice wrote:
Hey Folks,
Thanks for the speedy comments re: sensitivity. So my follow-up question
(and then I'll try to get some work done today!)is there any reciprocity
failure issues with digital de
The D and the Ds have the same sensor and very similar characteristics
for all intents and purposes so
I have no compunctions about answering from experience.
I've found that from ISO 200 - 800 the noise levels are low enough that
you can pick you ISO for the
Shutter speed F stop combination yo
Be sure to install the updated firmware ... I understand it helps with long
exposures.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Barry Rice
> Thanks for the speedy comments re: sensitivity. So my follow-up question
> (and then I'll try to get some work done today!)is there any
reciprocity
> fail
Hey Folks,
Thanks for the speedy comments re: sensitivity. So my follow-up question
(and then I'll try to get some work done today!)is there any reciprocity
failure issues with digital detectors? I'd think the detection was fairly
linear with long integrations (exposures), but I'm guessing tha
://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Adam Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 16. september 2005 19:45
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Selecting the digital sensitivity
Barry Rice wrote:
> Hey Folks,
>
> I'm now learning how to think "digitally&qu
On Sep 16, 2005, at 10:15 AM, Barry Rice wrote:
I'm now learning how to think "digitally" with my *ist-DS. The
thing that
perplexes me is setting the sensitivity. I'm used to shooting with
Velvia
since minimal grain and nice saturation are important to me. What
sensitivity do people use? I'm
Barry Rice wrote:
Hey Folks,
I'm now learning how to think "digitally" with my *ist-DS. The thing that
perplexes me is setting the sensitivity. I'm used to shooting with Velvia
since minimal grain and nice saturation are important to me. What
sensitivity do people use? I'm no stranger to taking
Hey Folks,
I'm now learning how to think "digitally" with my *ist-DS. The thing that
perplexes me is setting the sensitivity. I'm used to shooting with Velvia
since minimal grain and nice saturation are important to me. What
sensitivity do people use? I'm no stranger to taking 15 second exposures
Mike Johnston wrote:
>
> Tom Van Veen,
> There's a good comparison of sensitivity vs. noise for the Canon D30 and
> EOS-1D at:
>
> http://www.dpreview.com/articles/canoneos1d/page9.asp
>
> It looks like the 1D has usable sensitivity up to 800 ISO equivalent, at
> least.
Neato, I wonder what pr
Tom Van Veen,
There's a good comparison of sensitivity vs. noise for the Canon D30 and
EOS-1D at:
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/canoneos1d/page9.asp
It looks like the 1D has usable sensitivity up to 800 ISO equivalent, at
least.
--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
12 matches
Mail list logo
