Re: DxO Photolab 4 - the verdict

2020-12-02 Thread Ralf R Radermacher
Am 02.12.20 um 21:56 schrieb l...@red4est.com: Also my oldest Pentax is a k100, is that supported? The oldest I've been able to find was the K200D. Here's their list: https://www.dxo.com/dxo-photolab/supported-cameras/ Would you be able to sell your license? No idea. Ralf -- Ralf R. Rad

Re: DxO Photolab 4 - the verdict

2020-12-02 Thread lrc
I never assumed that I would stay with lightroom so each shoot is in a separate directory, with the name based on date, and some using a directory tree. So I don't have any huge directories. Also my oldest Pentax is a k100, is that supported? Would you be able to sell your license? On Decemb

Re: DxO Photolab 4 - the verdict

2020-12-02 Thread P. J. Alling
Actually if it works the way DxO Optics Pro does that won't work.  It reads the tags in the file and won't open a DNG from a camera or converted from a RAW file from that camera that it doesn't have a module within their framework that supports it. On 12/2/2020 1:01 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Ra

Re: DxO Photolab 4 - the verdict

2020-12-02 Thread P. J. Alling
That's interesting, I'm using DxO Optics Pro 9, which is the predecessor to DxO Photolab, which has all the perspective control built in. Photolab seems to be a distinct step back in functionality, in that regard. The lack of support for earlier cameras is annoying but I've kept a couple of ol

Re: DxO Photolab 4 - the verdict

2020-12-02 Thread Ralf R Radermacher
Am 02.12.20 um 19:01 schrieb Mark Roberts: Shouldn't you be able to convert older raw files into DNG and use them that way? I do this with all my raw files anyway. Radio Yerevan: In principle yes. But I'd still be left with its slow speed and missing ability to handle large directories. Ralf

Re: DxO Photolab 4 - the verdict

2020-12-02 Thread Mark Roberts
Ralf R Radermacher wrote: >Am 02.12.20 um 18:00 schrieb l...@red4est.com: >> Thanks for the review. I was really hoping there was a good alternative to >> lightroom > >The output quality is OK. > >As long as your directories don't have more than, say, a few hundred >files and your camera is a K10

Re: DxO Photolab 4 - the verdict

2020-12-02 Thread Ralf R Radermacher
Am 02.12.20 um 18:00 schrieb l...@red4est.com: Thanks for the review. I was really hoping there was a good alternative to lightroom The output quality is OK. As long as your directories don't have more than, say, a few hundred files and your camera is a K10D or later then it is usable. That

Re: DxO Photolab 4 - the verdict

2020-12-02 Thread lrc
Thanks for the review. I was really hoping there was a good alternative to lightroom On December 2, 2020 8:36:51 AM PST, Ralf R Radermacher wrote: >I've been playing around with their demo version for a while, using a >selection of raw files on another drive to avoid messing up my 'real' >data.

DxO Photolab 4 - the verdict

2020-12-02 Thread Ralf R Radermacher
I've been playing around with their demo version for a while, using a selection of raw files on another drive to avoid messing up my 'real' data. The results looked promising, so I was lured by their Black Friday offer into buying the actual product plus DxO ViewPoint, a separately sold add-on do