the images.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "John Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Effort Made To Restore Photography's Credibility
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:28:36PM -0600, William Robb wrote:
>>
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ken Waller"
> Subject: Re: Effort Made To Restore Photography's Credibility
>
>
>
>> It all boils down to the credeability of the one who took the image.
>> When I've testified
Whether you clone or not, depends on the purpose of the photography.
Do you lean toward documentary or artful interpretation? Did you
shoot so you could record the Bulgarian landscape as it now exists or
were you trying to create an artful photograph? If the latter was
your goal, by all mea
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:28:36PM -0600, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Doug Franklin"
> Subject: Re: Effort Made To Restore Photography's Credibility
>
>
>
> > Well, that's really the quandry, actually. Which w
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Franklin"
Subject: Re: Effort Made To Restore Photography's Credibility
> Well, that's really the quandry, actually. Which way do I want to
> present the images ... more artistic or more journalistic. I'm still
> de
Doug Franklin wrote:
> William Robb wrote:
>
>> Photography isn't about reality anyway. Everyone has a point of view,
>> whether their intent is artistic, journalistic or any other [...]
>
> Well, that's really the quandry, actually. Which way do I want to
> present the images ... more artistic
William Robb wrote:
> Photography isn't about reality anyway. Everyone has a point of view,
> whether their intent is artistic, journalistic or any other [...]
Well, that's really the quandry, actually. Which way do I want to
present the images ... more artistic or more journalistic. I'm still
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Franklin"
Subject: Re: Effort Made To Restore Photography's Credibility
>
> I'm in a real quandry. Some of the photos I took last week in Bulgaria
> would be beautiful but for the power and phone and whatever else lin
Charles Robinson wrote:
> PS: I lied. I just recalled that in the past I've removed cold sores
> and zits from portraits. But that's about it. :-)
I'm in a real quandry. Some of the photos I took last week in Bulgaria
would be beautiful but for the power and phone and whatever else lines
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Waller"
Subject: Re: Effort Made To Restore Photography's Credibility
> It all boils down to the credeability of the one who took the image.
> When I've testified in product litigation trials, a main point in the
> present
on images was that I took the
> images & they are a
> true & accurate dipiction of what I saw on the day of my inspection.
> The images are only as credeable as the testifier.
>
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
>
> - Original Message -
testifier.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: fwd: Effort Made To Restore Photography's Credibility
>I thought this article published by Anick Jesdanun of the Associated
> Press an
On Feb 26, 2008, at 11:58, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
>
> BTW, he never does any kind of cloning in his pictures.
>
FWIW, with the exception of removing sensor dust splotches, I don't do
it either. It rubs me the wrong way to "fix" a photo by removing
elements that were there in the original photo
n his pictures.
>
> - Mensaje original
> De: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Para: SeePhoto Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; PDML List
> Enviado: martes, 26 de febrero, 2008 18:20:25
> Asunto: fwd: Effort Made To Restore Photography's Credibility
>
&g
My apologies. You're right of course. That is the headline of the article. I
read only the body copy. It's interesting in that headlines are frequently
written by someone other than the author. Again, my mistake. (Slapping self:
Wake up!)
Paul
-- Original message ---
Rather Ironic coming from AP don't ya think?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Interesting, as far as it goes. And relevant in regard to journalism and
> crime photography. I think your title misleads a bit. The article speaks of
> restoring the credibility of a photograph -- that is, developing a met
My subject line was the headline of the article as presented, Paul. I
did not intend it to mean anything other than to identify the piece
as it was published on MSNBC.com.
Of course, it's a bit sensationalist ... as are most headlines in
this horrid infotainment world of marketing pap and sp
a: SeePhoto Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; PDML List
Enviado: martes, 26 de febrero, 2008 18:20:25
Asunto: fwd: Effort Made To Restore Photography's Credibility
I
thought
this
article
published
by
Anick
Jesdanun
of
the
Associated
Press
an
interesting
read.
http://www.msnbc.ms
Interesting, as far as it goes. And relevant in regard to journalism and crime
photography. I think your title misleads a bit. The article speaks of restoring
the credibility of a photograph -- that is, developing a method of determining
that a photo hasn't been altered when that is important. I
I thought this article published by Anick Jesdanun of the Associated
Press an interesting read.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23342630/
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link direc
20 matches
Mail list logo
