Enablement and a question on list rules

2013-04-17 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi! After quite a wait (which was totally worth it), another Ricoh GXR-M mount module arrived here yesterday. This time it was accompanied by Novoflex K-mount adapter. This is most wondrous thing as it works seamlessly regardless of whether the lens has an aperture ring or not. Focusing it w

Re: Enablement and a question on list rules

2013-04-17 Thread Eactivist
The PUG has always allowed shots that use JUST a Pentax lens, not necessarily a Pentax camera. (I just double checked that, yup.) The annual I am not sure about. (I looked on Mark's page and didn't/couldn't find any break down in specifications like that.) HTH, Marnie aka Doe :-) But, you

Re: Enablement and a question on list rules

2013-04-17 Thread Bong Manayon
So long you're wearing a Pentax watch... :) On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:59 AM, wrote: > The PUG has always allowed shots that use JUST a Pentax lens, not > necessarily a Pentax camera. (I just double checked that, yup.) The annual I > am not > sure about. (I looked on Mark's page and didn't/c

Re: Enablement and a question on list rules

2013-04-17 Thread Eactivist
LOL. Normally I don't post lols, but this one qualifies. I'd love that as a new rule. Marnie aka Doe :-) In a message dated 4/17/2013 9:04:47 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, bongmana...@gmail.com writes: So long you're wearing a Pentax watch... :) On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:59 AM, eactiv...@a

Re: Enablement and a question on list rules

2013-04-17 Thread Peter Loveday
Or using a Pentax Endoscope. Just don't post behind-the-scenes shots. -Original Message- From: Bong Manayon Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 1:34 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Enablement and a question on list rules So long you're wearing a Pentax watch...

Re: Enablement and a question on list rules

2013-04-17 Thread Eactivist
Thursday, April 18, 2013 1:34 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Enablement and a question on list rules So long you're wearing a Pentax watch... :) On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:59 AM, wrote: > The PUG has always allowed shots that use JUST a Pentax lens, not > necessarily

Re: Enablement and a question on list rules

2013-04-17 Thread Larry Colen
On Apr 17, 2013, at 8:35 PM, Boris Liberman wrote: > Hi! > > After quite a wait (which was totally worth it), another Ricoh GXR-M mount > module arrived here yesterday. This time it was accompanied by Novoflex > K-mount adapter. This is most wondrous thing as it works seamlessly > regardless

RE: Enablement and a question on list rules

2013-04-17 Thread John Coyle
-Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Boris Liberman Sent: Thursday, 18 April 2013 1:36 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Enablement and a question on list rules Hi! After quite a wait (which was totally worth it), another Ricoh GXR-M mount module

Re: Enablement and a question on list rules

2013-04-17 Thread Larry Colen
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 02:46:45PM +1000, John Coyle wrote: > Boris, the PUG is definitely for photos taken with at least one item of > Pentax gear, either lens or > camera - not sure that flashes, lens hoods, etc., would qualify! > I think the PDML annual is more relaxed, although I may not agree

Re: Enablement and a question on list rules

2013-04-18 Thread Jaume Lahuerta
de abril de 2013 5:35 > Asunto: Enablement and a question on list rules > > Hi! > > After quite a wait (which was totally worth it), another Ricoh GXR-M mount > module arrived here yesterday. This time it was accompanied by Novoflex > K-mount > adapter. This is most w

Re: Enablement and a question on list rules

2013-04-18 Thread Brian Walters
Quoting Boris Liberman : Hi! After quite a wait (which was totally worth it), another Ricoh GXR-M mount module arrived here yesterday. This time it was accompanied by Novoflex K-mount adapter. This is most wondrous thing as it works seamlessly regardless of whether the lens has an apertur

Re: Enablement and a question on list rules

2013-04-19 Thread kwaller
t and a question on list rules The PUG has always allowed shots that use JUST a Pentax lens, not necessarily a Pentax camera. (I just double checked that, yup.) The annual I am not sure about. (I looked on Mark's page and didn't/couldn't find any break down in specificati

Re: Enablement and a question on list rules

2013-04-19 Thread kwaller
Yeah, that would be like Showing a Chrysler at a Dodge car club show. For old timer, Chrysler = Dodge & Chrysler vehicles. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Larry Colen" Subject: Re: Enablement and a question

Re: Enablement and a question on list rules

2013-04-19 Thread Larry Colen
On Apr 19, 2013, at 8:15 AM, wrote: >> But, you know, maybe one of these days they'll >> lighten up the rules to people who once USED a Pentax. Heh. > > They could start a mailing list of their own - the POUP. Pentax Ricoh Online Discussion: PROD -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4e

Re: Enablement and a question on list rules

2013-04-19 Thread Larry Colen
On Apr 19, 2013, at 8:17 AM, wrote: >> Yeah, that would be like Showing a Chrysler at a Dodge car club show. > > For old timer, Chrysler = Dodge & Chrysler vehicles. Yeah, that was kind of my point. Maybe I should have said Mercedes, or rather Fiat. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from

Re: Enablement and a question on list rules

2013-04-20 Thread Boris Liberman
Thanks, Marnie. It seems (<-- keyword) to me that the book requirements are the same, but I am not 100% sure. Maybe Mark could clarify. Boris On 4/18/2013 6:59 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote: The PUG has always allowed shots that use JUST a Pentax lens, not necessarily a Pentax camera. (I just

Re: Enablement and a question on list rules

2013-04-20 Thread Boris Liberman
personally. John Coyle Brisbane, Australia -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Boris Liberman Sent: Thursday, 18 April 2013 1:36 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Enablement and a question on list rules Hi! After quite a wait (which was

Re: Enablement and a question on list rules

2013-04-20 Thread Eactivist
I am surprised he hasn't. Marnie aka Doe ;-) Maybe you need to yell you know what. In a message dated 4/20/2013 10:47:04 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, bori...@gmail.com writes: Thanks, Marnie. It seems (<-- keyword) to me that the book requirements are the same, but I am not 100% sure. Mayb