ression that somehow all the
planes of focus were being concurrently resolved by the lens in parallel.
regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: "Digital Image Studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 200
On 1/27/07, Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 26, 2007, at 7:32 PM, Barry Rice wrote:
>
> > Indeed! That's it!
> >
> > But I guess I won't be doing it anytime soon, myself! Alas.
> >
> > The effect, by the way, is really extraordinary and far beyond what
> > you'd
> > expect from just
On Jan 26, 2007, at 7:32 PM, Barry Rice wrote:
> Indeed! That's it!
>
> But I guess I won't be doing it anytime soon, myself! Alas.
>
> The effect, by the way, is really extraordinary and far beyond what
> you'd
> expect from just using a stopped down ultra-short focus lens. Really
> remarkable
On 1/27/07, Peter McIntosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Digital Image Studio wrote:
> > On 27/01/07, Barry Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I'm fairly confident that this is not a bit of greenscreen magic. But I'm
> >> trying to figure out the method. It probably would cost gadzillions,
I don't know either. A DOF tool is a shift lens, and is simply
something that came to mind while reading your post.
I'll be following the thread myself.
Jack
--- Barry Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Folks,
>
> A general photography question
>
> I'm a big fan of David Attenborough d
I've seen what appear as sharply focus water drops on such lenses with
an in-focus background. Amazing!
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A close focusing wide angle lens? If he's shooting 35mm movie film a
>
> wide lens is something like an 8 to 12 mm. You get one heck of a
Hey Rob,
Indeed! That's it!
But I guess I won't be doing it anytime soon, myself! Alas.
The effect, by the way, is really extraordinary and far beyond what you'd
expect from just using a stopped down ultra-short focus lens. Really
remarkable.
B
Barry A. Rice, Ph.D.
Invasive Species Specia
Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 27/01/07, Barry Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> I'm fairly confident that this is not a bit of greenscreen magic. But I'm
>> trying to figure out the method. It probably would cost gadzillions, but
>> wowif I could achieve that kind of perspective.
On 27/01/07, Barry Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm fairly confident that this is not a bit of greenscreen magic. But I'm
> trying to figure out the method. It probably would cost gadzillions, but
> wowif I could achieve that kind of perspective..
AFAIK they use a Panavision/Frazier
- Original Message -
From: "Barry Rice" Subject: Extreme depth of field technique
> Hey Folks,
>
> A general photography question
>
> I'm a big fan of David Attenborough documentaries. Starting with his
> series,
> The Private Life of Plant
A close focusing wide angle lens? If he's shooting 35mm movie film a
wide lens is something like an 8 to 12 mm. You get one heck of a lot
of DOF with a lens like that.
Paul
On Jan 26, 2007, at 6:46 PM, Barry Rice wrote:
> Hey Folks,
>
> A general photography question
>
> I'm a big fan of D
Hey Folks,
A general photography question
I'm a big fan of David Attenborough documentaries. Starting with his series,
The Private Life of Plants, occasionally his film team uses a spectacular
technique which I simply do not understand how they achieve. It is like an
extreme hyperfocal dept
12 matches
Mail list logo
