John wrote:
How about a Limited 150/f2, with a matched doubler to make it a 300/4?
REPLY:
Oooops! Now you're getting very close. No Limited though
Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
Peter wrote:
Howzabout an FA 135mm F1.8? That would glean Pentax some much needed
limelight. Make it a DC lens, like the Nikkor.
I've been told that such a lens does not figure in the plans. Price for
such a lens would be 2000USD + .
However, there are alternatives almost certainly not
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 09:06:46 +0100, you wrote:
Howzabout an FA 135mm F1.8? That would glean Pentax some much needed
limelight. Make it a DC lens, like the Nikkor.
I've been told that such a lens does not figure in the plans. Price for
such a lens would be 2000USD + .
However, there are
Anyone have any info on a replacement for the FA 135/2.8 (end of production
2000)?
Is this just a poor selling focal length, or is there something even better
coming? (a Limited or FA* replacement perhaps?)
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Dan wrote:
Anyone have any info on a replacement for the FA 135/2.8 (end of production
2000)?
It exist. It may not reach the market.
Is this just a poor selling focal length, or is there something even better
coming? (a Limited or FA* replacement perhaps?)
It is a poor selling focal
In a message dated 13/12/01 15:14:11 GMT Standard Time, Paal writes:
Re: FA 135/2.8 replacement coming?
Dan wrote:
Anyone have any info on a replacement for the FA 135/2.8 (end of production
2000)?
It exist. It may not reach the market.
Is this just a poor selling focal
Sounds good to me!
Make it so.
Dan Scott (cold, wet San Antonio)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter wrote:
Howzabout an FA 135mm F1.8? That would glean Pentax some much needed
limelight. Make it a DC lens, like the Nikkor.
Kind regards from sunny Brighton, soon Kagoshima
Peter
-
This message is from
That's a bummer.
The FA 135/2.8 has very good comments wrt performance. Any idea how the
replacement would have differed?
Thanks,
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pål wrote:
It is a poor selling focal length so the new version may not be released.
My understanding of this issue was that the new FA
8 matches
Mail list logo