>
> From: Peter McIntosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/12/06 Wed AM 11:13:13 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: FTZ flash assumptions.
>
> mike wilson wrote:
> > Indeed. Should have been the 200 series. 200S autoflash, 200T same wit
mike wilson wrote:
>> mike wilson wrote:
>>
>
> I've used mine on the LX and Z1-p when I didn't want to carry a large flash.
> It's a bit limited, having a fixed head, but plenty of urge for small
> locations. Stofen softens things nicely.
>
> AFAIU, it should not work in TTL with the DL.
Thibouille wrote:
> No, you are using Programmed auto mode.
> It works in auto mode but sets the lens to one of the possible auto
> seeting automaticaly.
> It means that if the flash can only operate auto at f/4, that you will
> ALWAYS end takeing the picture at f/4 ... annoying isn't it ?
>
> Thib
No, you are using Programmed auto mode.
It works in auto mode but sets the lens to one of the possible auto
seeting automaticaly.
It means that if the flash can only operate auto at f/4, that you will
ALWAYS end takeing the picture at f/4 ... annoying isn't it ?
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
---
mike wilson wrote:
> Indeed. Should have been the 200 series. 200S autoflash, 200T same with
> added TTL.
>
Hm...
I have an AF200T. It works with my ist-DL quite well in program mode -
sets apreture according to power setting on flash (with appropriate
lens), and restricts shutter spe
Indeed. Should have been the 200 series. 200S autoflash, 200T same with added
TTL.
>
> From: "Bob Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/12/06 Wed AM 01:45:09 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: FTZ flash assumptions.
>
> not
not so the AF220... No sensor on flash.
On 12/5/06, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Whittingham wrote:
>
> >>You don't need that. The AF280/220/400T will all work on anything
> >>that you can set the aperture on and that will fire them. They have
> >>a built-in sensor to tell them
John Whittingham wrote:
>>NNS is only about £150.
>
>
> You can still get them new then, best lasting flash I ever had, got with a
> Super A outfit I bought years ago. Used right up to MZ-3 and I can even use
> it on the *ist D
Like I say, you can use it on any camera that you can control the
> NNS is only about £150.
You can still get them new then, best lasting flash I ever had, got with a
Super A outfit I bought years ago. Used right up to MZ-3 and I can even use
it on the *ist D
John
--
John Whittingham wrote:
>>You don't need that. The AF280/220/400T will all work on anything
>>that you can set the aperture on and that will fire them. They have
>>a built-in sensor to tell them when to quench. Probably others in
>>that series, too, like the 200 and 160.
>
>
> There's life
automatically.
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Sent: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:35:56 -0600
Subject: Re: FTZ flash assumptions.
> John, your signature is really long, and its doubly long when
> someone quotes your message and
John Whittingham wrote:
>>I know you can still buy the AF400T new at B&H. I'm not sure about
>>the 280. Paul
>
>
> Probably for the MF users still using film I guess, it's a great flash IMHO.
>
>
>
> John
I've considered buying one, but its massive and the build quality is very low.
I'll s
rk with the digital cameras.
>
>
> Nor me.
>
> John
>
>
> -- Original Message ---
> From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Sent: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 11:06:20 + (GMT)
> Subject: Re: FTZ flash assumptions.
>
05 Dec 2006 15:33:29 +0000
Subject: Re: FTZ flash assumptions.
> I know you can still buy the AF400T new at B&H. I'm not sure about
> the 280. Paul
> -- Original message --
> From: "John Whittingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> &
I know you can still buy the AF400T new at B&H. I'm not sure about the 280.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: "John Whittingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > You don't need that. The AF280/220/400T will all work on anything
> > that you can set the aperture on and that
A 280T should work fine in analog TTL mode as well as program auto mode.
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> You don't need that. The AF280/220/400T will all work on anything
> that you can set the aperture on and that will fire them. They have
> a built-in sensor to tell them when to quench. Probably others in
> that series, too, like the 200 and 160.
There's life in the AF280T yet then, how lon
>
> From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/12/05 Tue AM 11:06:20 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: FTZ flash assumptions.
>
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, John Whittingham wrote:
>
> > No idea, isn't it nmissing the conne
>
> From: "John Whittingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/12/05 Tue AM 10:28:25 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: FTZ flash assumptions.
>
> > As an auto?
>
> No idea, isn't it nmissing the connection fot the digital p
>
> From: "John Whittingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/12/05 Tue AM 09:39:02 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: FTZ flash assumptions.
>
> > Looks like the 330 will
> > only fire at full power on those bodies (or am I missi
work with the digital cameras.
Nor me.
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Sent: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 11:06:20 + (GMT)
Subject: Re: FTZ flash assumptions.
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, John Whittingham wrote:
&
t the digital pin?
>
> John
>
>
> -- Original Message ---
> From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Sent: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 09:53:21 + (GMT)
> Subject: Re: FTZ flash assumptions.
>
> > On Tue, 5 Dec
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, John Whittingham wrote:
> No idea, isn't it nmissing the connection fot the digital pin?
Not great with electronics, but I am guessing that all a flash needs
so as to operate in self-quenching auto is something to tell it
"flash". That's the middle round contact and the grou
> As an auto?
No idea, isn't it nmissing the connection fot the digital pin?
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Sent: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 09:53:21 + (GMT)
Subject: Re: FTZ flash assumptions
, 5 Dec 2006 09:35:30 + (GMT)
Subject: Re: FTZ flash assumptions.
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, John Whittingham wrote:
>
> > Thanks for that Adam on Boz's site the DS2 is listed as "HS" whatever
that
> > is,
>
> Look for High-Speed flash in
>
> http:/
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, John Whittingham wrote:
> It's looking that way, not to worry. I'm not sure how the AF280T would
> perform, I think it's analogue only so would work with the *ist D but not
> later bodies that are digital only such as the KD's.
As an auto?
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 08:55:52 +0100
Subject: Re: FTZ flash assumptions.
> Little summary:
>
> ist-D: offers TTL (both old analog TTL and digital TTL) both external
> and RTF flash.Offers P-TTL.
>
> ist-DS/DS2
only such as the KD's.
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Sent: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:30:23 -0800
Subject: Re: FTZ flash assumptions.
> Yes - I find the AF280T more versatile than the 330. At least its
t table is absent from the AF-
360FGZ manual I have. Maybe an early manual?
Regards,
John
-- Original Message ---
From: "Jostein Øksne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 09:42:32 +0100
Subject: Re: FTZ flash assu
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, John Whittingham wrote:
> Thanks for that Adam on Boz's site the DS2 is listed as "HS" whatever that
> is,
Look for High-Speed flash in
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/technology/hot-shoe/index.html
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/list
There are also some nice tables in the instruction manual for the
AF540FGZ, laying out the compatibilty level with just about all Pentax
cameras. You can easily infer which generation of flash automation
each camera has. :-)
The document is here:
http://www.pentaxslr.com/files/scms_docs/AF540FGZ_w
Little summary:
ist-D: offers TTL (both old analog TTL and digital TTL) both external
and RTF flash.Offers P-TTL.
ist-DS/DS2: offers TTL (both old analog TTL and digital TTL) but only
external flash. Internal is PTTL or full power. Works quite better
than D TTL. Offers PTTL as well.
ist-DL/DL2/K
Yes - I find the AF280T more versatile than the 330. At least its got an
inbuilt sensor to cut off the light, which should allow it to be used with the
KD bodies in non-TTL mode. Looks like the 330 will only fire at full power on
those bodies (or am I missing something?)
Cheers
Brian
+
> The D does TTL flash with all flashes including the RTF. The Ds
> does TTL flash with external flashes, (seems to work better than the
> D most of the time). I expect that the DS2 does it as well. I'm
> not sure about the DL and DL2.
Thanks P.J. I'm just trying to thin out some of my kit
The D does TTL flash with all flashes including the RTF. The Ds does
TTL flash with external flashes, (seems to work better than the D most
of the time). I expect that the DS2 does it as well. I'm not sure
about the DL and DL2.
John Whittingham wrote:
> Hi
>
> I breifly caught the thread reg
"P-TTL" which I know about
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Sent: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 16:37:14 -0500
Subject: Re: FTZ flash assumptions.
> TTL ended with the DS2. The DS and DS2 actually do TTL better than
&
Hi
I breifly caught the thread regarding the AF-500FTZ flash on the K10D. I can
safely assume that the A-400FTZ and AF-330FTZ will be afflicted with the same
problems yes?
Did TTL flash end with the *ist D? Can I assume that all FTZ flashes will
only work in AUTO if at all with DS, DS2, DL, D
m: Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Sent: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 13:35:58 -0800
Subject: Re: FTZ flash assumptions.
> I don't know about the FTZ330 with the K10D (although I suspect it
> woun't work in TTL mode). It works in TTL mode on the DS although
I don't know about the FTZ330 with the K10D (although I suspect it woun't work
in TTL mode). It works in TTL mode on the DS although the manual warns that
"image may be underexposed near minimum aperture and overexposed near open
aperture in lenses with bright F value". Not sure what "bright F
TTL ended with the DS2. The DS and DS2 actually do TTL better than the D.
The DL, DL2 and all K series do not do TTL.
-Adam
John Whittingham wrote:
> Hi
>
> I breifly caught the thread regarding the AF-500FTZ flash on the K10D. I can
> safely assume that the A-400FTZ and AF-330FTZ will be aff
40 matches
Mail list logo
