Thanks Dan, I appreciate your comment.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
Subject: Re: FWIW
Simply superior in every aspect.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On M
Thanks Gonz.
This image also captured first place in an Alaska Magazine contest a few
years back.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Gonz"
Subject: Re: FWIW
Amazing, sharp, and dramatic capture! Congrats.
On F
Simply superior in every aspect.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Gonz wrote:
> Amazing, sharp, and dramatic capture! Congrats.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> > Was just notified that my image 'North Fa
Amazing, sharp, and dramatic capture! Congrats.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Was just notified that my image 'North Face of Denali' placed third out of
> approximately 185 submissions in the monthly photo contest 'Monochrome'
> sponsored by Pentax Forums. Whoopi !
>
> Li
Thanks Zos and David B for commenting.
Damn, That should be first place.
Actually the first place image is equal or better IMO.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Zos Xavius"
Subject: Re: FWIW
Damn, That shoul
Well done Ken and a great image
Dave
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Was just notified that my image 'North Face of Denali' placed third out of
> approximately 185 submissions in the monthly photo contest 'Monochrome'
> sponsored by Pentax Forums. Whoopi !
>
> Link to image
axphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>
> - Original Message - From: "Bob W-PDML"
> Subject: Re: FWIW
>
>
>
>> That's a really spectacular shot, well deserving of a prize.
>>
>> B
>>
>>>
>>> Ken Waller wrote:
>>>
&g
Thanks Bob, Paul, Christine, Daniel, Ann, Malcolm, Jack, Marco, Paul in MKE,
Stan, Eric, Philip, Alan and John for looking and commenting.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W-PDML"
Subject: Re: FWIW
That&
Tres cool!
On 11/25/2016 3:25 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Was just notified that my image 'North Face of Denali' placed third out
of approximately 185 submissions in the monthly photo contest
'Monochrome' sponsored by Pentax Forums. Whoopi !
Link to image - http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=171
Well deserved. A wonderful image. 940mm!
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Ken Waller
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 10:25 PM
To: pentax list
Subject: FWIW
Was just notified that my image 'North Face of Denali' placed third out of
approximately 185 submissions in the mon
Dramatic
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 26/11/16 7:25 am, Ken Waller wrote:
Was just notified that my image 'North Face of Denali' placed third out
of approximately 185 submissions in the monthly photo contest
'Monochrome' sponsored by Pentax Forums. Whoopi !
Link to image
On 25 November 2016 at 20:25, Ken Waller wrote:
> Was just notified that my image 'North Face of Denali' placed third out of
> approximately 185 submissions in the monthly photo contest 'Monochrome'
> sponsored by Pentax Forums. Whoopi !
>
> Link to image - http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=
> On Nov 25, 2016, at 3:25 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>
> Was just notified that my image 'North Face of Denali' placed third out of
> approximately 185 submissions in the monthly photo contest 'Monochrome'
> sponsored by Pentax Forums. Whoopi !
>
> Link to image - http://photo.net/photodb/photo?p
That's a really spectacular shot, well deserving of a prize.
B
>
> Ken Waller wrote:
>
> Was just notified that my image 'North Face of Denali' placed third out of
> approximately 185 submissions in the monthly photo contest 'Monochrome'
> sponsored by Pentax Forums. Whoopi !
>
> Link to imag
Stunning! Congrats...
-p
On 11/25/2016 2:25 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Was just notified that my image 'North Face of Denali' placed third
out of approximately 185 submissions in the monthly photo contest
'Monochrome' sponsored by Pentax Forums. Whoopi !
Link to image - http://photo.net/photodb/
Congratulations! (And well deserved.)
- Marco
> On Nov 25, 2016, at 12:25 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>
> Was just notified that my image 'North Face of Denali' placed third out of
> approximately 185 submissions in the monthly photo contest 'Monochrome'
> sponsored by Pentax Forums. Whoopi !
>
>
Wonderfully clean image!
Congrats!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 25, 2016, at 12:53 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> woo woo though not surprised!
>
> ann
>
>
>> On 11/25/2016 3:25 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>> Was just notified that my image 'North Face of Denali' placed third out of
>> approxim
Ken Waller wrote:
Was just notified that my image 'North Face of Denali' placed third out of
approximately 185 submissions in the monthly photo contest 'Monochrome'
sponsored by Pentax Forums. Whoopi !
Link to image - http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17185812
I was approximately 23 miles
woo woo though not surprised!
ann
On 11/25/2016 3:25 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Was just notified that my image 'North Face of Denali' placed third
out of approximately 185 submissions in the monthly photo contest
'Monochrome' sponsored by Pentax Forums. Whoopi !
Link to image - http://photo.net
Congratulations!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Was just notified that my image 'North Face of Denali' placed third out of
> approximately 185 submissions in the monthly photo contest 'Monochrome'
> sponsored by
Congrats, Ken! Very nice! Cheers, Christine
> On Nov 25, 2016, at 2:25 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>
> Was just notified that my image 'North Face of Denali' placed third out of
> approximately 185 submissions in the monthly photo contest 'Monochrome'
> sponsored by Pentax Forums. Whoopi !
>
> L
Well deserved. Congratulations!
Paul via phone
> On Nov 25, 2016, at 3:25 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>
> Was just notified that my image 'North Face of Denali' placed third out of
> approximately 185 submissions in the monthly photo contest 'Monochrome'
> sponsored by Pentax Forums. Whoopi !
>
>
Was just notified that my image 'North Face of Denali' placed third out of
approximately 185 submissions in the monthly photo contest 'Monochrome'
sponsored by Pentax Forums. Whoopi !
Link to image - http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17185812
I was approximately 23 miles north of Denali w
Adorama also has it with an sd card for the same price.
Larry in Dallas
-Original Message-
From: Ken Waller
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 11:08 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: FWIW - K3 W/BG5 grip @ B+H
B+H offering K3 body with BG5 grip for $796.35
Thought some members
B+H offering K3 body with BG5 grip for $796.35
Thought some members would be interested in this.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxk100d/
In Short: Highly Recommended, wasn't too impressed with SR, fixes the
in-camera processing problems of *ist DS, poor buffer...
Mike
--
--
MichaelHamilton.ca
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.ne
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Maas"
Subject: Re: FWIW - New Canon
>>>What is a "partial 9% at center" metering mode. Is that Canon-speak
>>>for spot metering?
>>
>>
>> Yup.
> Umm, nope.
>
> Canon does do spot meterin
Mat Maessen wrote:
> On 8/26/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>>http://www.dpreview.com/news/0608/06082416canoneos400drebelxti.asp
>>
>>It seems well enough spec'd. Canon at it's best.
>
>
> What is a "partial 9% at center" metering mode. Is that Canon-speak
> for spot metering?
>
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mat Maessen"
> Subject: Re: FWIW - New Canon
>
>
>
>>On 8/26/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>>http://www.dpreview.com/news/0608/06082416canoneos400drebelxti.
- Original Message -
From: "Mat Maessen"
Subject: Re: FWIW - New Canon
> On 8/26/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>http://www.dpreview.com/news/0608/06082416canoneos400drebelxti.asp
>> It seems well enough spec'd. Canon at it'
Mat Maessen wrote:
> On 8/26/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>>http://www.dpreview.com/news/0608/06082416canoneos400drebelxti.asp
>>
>>It seems well enough spec'd. Canon at it's best.
>
>
> What is a "partial 9% at center" metering mode. Is that Canon-speak
> for spot metering?
>
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 12:44:01PM -0400, Mat Maessen wrote:
> On 8/26/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>http://www.dpreview.com/news/0608/06082416canoneos400drebelxti.asp
> > It seems well enough spec'd. Canon at it's best.
>
> What is a "partial 9% at center" metering mode. Is that
On 8/26/06 12:43 PM, "Adam Maas", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Excet it's now the only 10MP model without a decent viewfinder (the D80
> got the D200's viewfinder, which is as good or better than the D/DS
> finder, the A100 has a finder similar to the DL).
More MP means less forgiving for the sha
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Shel Belinkoff"
> Subject: FWIW - New Canon
>
>
>
>>http://tinyurl.com/o4ywe
>>http://www.dpreview.com/news/0608/06082416canoneos400drebelxti.asp
>
>
> It seems well enough spec'
On 8/26/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>http://www.dpreview.com/news/0608/06082416canoneos400drebelxti.asp
> It seems well enough spec'd. Canon at it's best.
What is a "partial 9% at center" metering mode. Is that Canon-speak
for spot metering?
-Mat
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff"
Subject: FWIW - New Canon
> http://tinyurl.com/o4ywe
> http://www.dpreview.com/news/0608/06082416canoneos400drebelxti.asp
It seems well enough spec'd. Canon at it's best.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Ma
indeed... very Canon if you ask me ^^
Well, KM/Sony is even worse IMO... I woukdn't have imagine 2 years ago
that KM would make bodies even more ugly than Canons...
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
-
Still yes.
On 8/26/06, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's an ugly looking bug of a camera, ain't it.
>
>
> Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> >http://tinyurl.com/o4ywe
> >http://www.dpreview.com/news/0608/06082416canoneos400drebelxti.asp
> >
> >
> >Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@p
Yes.
On 8/26/06, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's an ugly looking bug of a camera, ain't it.
>
> Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> >http://tinyurl.com/o4ywe
> >http://www.dpreview.com/news/0608/06082416canoneos400drebelxti.asp
> >
> >
> >Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
It's an ugly looking bug of a camera, ain't it.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>http://tinyurl.com/o4ywe
>http://www.dpreview.com/news/0608/06082416canoneos400drebelxti.asp
>
>
>Shel
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
--
Its easy to understand why the cat has eclipsed the dog as modern America's
favorite pet. People
It's an ugly looking bug of a camera, ain't it.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>http://tinyurl.com/o4ywe
>http://www.dpreview.com/news/0608/06082416canoneos400drebelxti.asp
>
>
>Shel
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
--
Its easy to understand why the cat has eclipsed the dog as modern America's
favorite pet. People l
http://tinyurl.com/o4ywe
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0608/06082416canoneos400drebelxti.asp
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I have no idea whether anyone is looking for one. Adorama has a used
15mm/3.5 lens for $774.
Tom Reese
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I haven't heard anything about Hasselblad (Sweden) buying Imacon
(Denmark),
but then again,
reading financial stuff was never my strong side.
I know, Hassies get nice reviews. Quite expensive, but then again,
Imacon
made 10 Mp b
2005 01:13
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Another report on Pentax at CES - FWIW
will Hasselblads now come with a color co-ordinated axe?
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 6:25 PM
Subject: RE: A
will Hasselblads now come with a color co-ordinated axe?
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 6:25 PM
Subject: RE: Another report on Pentax at CES - FWIW
> ...after having visited www.imacon.dk
ROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: Another report on Pentax at CES - FWIW
> Since you mention Hasselblad; have you looked at the specs
> for the H1D? 22Megapixel (from a giant 37mm x 49mm sensor),
> 16 bits per colour component, and even an
-
Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 11. januar 2005 23:44
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: RE: Another report on Pentax at CES - FWIW
I haven't heard anything about Hasselblad (Sweden) buying Imacon (Denmark),
but then again,
reading financial stuff was never my strong si
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 11. januar 2005 20:31
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Another report on Pentax at CES - FWIW
Jens Bladt mused:
>
> OK. Why don&#x
Jens Bladt mused:
>
> OK. Why don't Pentax have (Danish) Imacon make digital backs for revised
> Pentax MF cameras?
> Hasselblad and Leica did, quite successfully, I believe.
I thought Hasselblad took the Remington approach?
(I liked the product so much I bought the company).
I don't know how in
ECTED]
Sendt: 11. januar 2005 02:44
Til: pdml
Emne: Another report on Pentax at CES - FWIW
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=11772575
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=11772575
I don't think it's comparing apples to apples, though.
If you attempt to work out the cost per wafer (multiply
the given unit cost by the number of working units) you
end up with a figure around $2745 for the three larger
sizes, where the wafer fab is the most expensive step.
On the three smaller
Very, very interesting!
I had little feel for most of this.
Yes, I know most of the processes, and terminology, but how many per wafer
and the yield therefrom — well, I just had no idea.
thanks for forwarding it...
keith whaley
jtainter wrote:
Seen on the Pentax group on dpreview.
Joe
---
Seen on the Pentax group on dpreview.
Joe
-
I thought I'd do the maths. Well, I borrowed the company cost model for estimating
silicon chip cost, and got it to do the math.
Some things to understand - this isn't REAL: the cost model is not up to date with all
the latest in
On Thursday, November 22, 2001, at 07:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Just the opposite. It's a dog. Wait for a K28/3.5.
>
It's pretty awful wide open, though it's perfectly adequate at f8. I
wouldn't want to pay more than $40 for an SMC-M 28mm f2.8. I think I
paid $20 for mine, so I s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< There was an SMC Pentax-M 28mm f2.8 lens which they wanted AUD$120 for.
..
(but please let me know if the 2.8 is a particularly good lens ;) >>
Rob,
Just the opposite. It's a dog. Wait for a K28/3.5.
Regards, Bob S.
-
This message is from the Pent
(this may be of interest to those in Oz, maybe not)
I dropped by Ted's in Southport today to ask if they'd heard anything about
Kodak dropping T400. They hadn't.
I noticed they had some 2nd hand lenses and asked if any were K mount.
There was an SMC Pentax-M 28mm f2.8 lens which they wanted AU
58 matches
Mail list logo
