John Francis writes:
There's no point in insuring it for more than that - the
insurance company reckon that is what it costs to buy a replacement
lens immediately (without waiting around for years for a bargain).
Is the replacement value in your policy set in concrete or will they account
Probably not nuts, Paal. Your postings seem coherent. But, then.
I have personal article insurance on all my camera stuff. All the reputable
commercial sources for a Pentax A300 F4 seem to show the lens at $650 and up. I have
the insurance level for that lens at $700.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
How insurance people and reputable commercial sources value a lens
does not necessarily reflect real world purchasing prices. I know
several people on this list who have bought one or more of these
lenses, in superb condition, for substantially less than the prices
posted by Ritz. Some
I bought the A* 300/2.8 for 1200. Maybe too much but cheapest I could find.
-Original Message-
From: Creature's Comfort [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 6:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Fast, Clean Glass* (200/2.8A*, 300/4A*, 300/2.8A
4 matches
Mail list logo
