Field diameter measurement (microscopy)

Hi all, Does anyone know the exact distance between the front surface of the *ist D mount and the sensor? Note for Cotty: Its warming up here -- only -12C. I read (on the BBC ticker) this morning that it's very cold in the UK a dreadful Siberian -2C! And they expect *6 inches* of snow! My

Re: Field diameter measurement (microscopy)

On 28 Dec 2005 at 12:11, Don Williams wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone know the exact distance > between the front surface of the *ist D > mount and the sensor? The K-mount flange to film plane distance I believe is 45.46mm and according to the mechanical diagram in the spec sheet for the sen

Re: Field diameter measurement (microscopy)

Don Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi all, > >Does anyone know the exact distance >between the front surface of the *ist D >mount and the sensor? 45.5mm -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com

Re: Field diameter measurement (microscopy)

On 12/28/05, Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 28 Dec 2005 at 12:11, Don Williams wrote: > > > Note for Cotty: Its warming up here -- > > only -12C. > > We endured a sultry day of 33 deg C with RH heading into the high 80s, > lovely, not, the forecast predicts temps in excess of 40 dec

Re: Field diameter measurement (microscopy)

nt: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 11:11 AM Subject: Field diameter measurement (microscopy) Hi all, Does anyone know the exact distance between the front surface of the *ist D mount and the sensor? Note for Cotty: Its warming up here -- only -12C. I read (on the BBC ticker) this morning that i

Re: Field diameter measurement (microscopy)

Thanks very much. The in-focus field diameter projected by the transfer lens is exactly 50mm which is what it ought to be. The flat (corrected) part of the image is about 38 mm across. The smaller sensor of the *ist D has certain advantages here; the field is flat to less than 0.5 mu all the

Re: Field diameter measurement (microscopy)

Don Williams wrote: Hi all, Does anyone know the exact distance between the front surface of the *ist D mount and the sensor? Note for Cotty: Its warming up here -- only -12C. I read (on the BBC ticker) this morning that it's very cold in the UK a dreadful Siberian -2C! And they expect *6

Re: Field diameter measurement (microscopy)

On 28/12/05, Don Williams, discombobulated, unleashed: >Does anyone know the exact distance >between the front surface of the *ist D >mount and the sensor? African or European ? ;-) > >Note for Cotty: Its warming up here -- >only -12C. I read (on the BBC ticker) >this morning that it's ver

Re: Field diameter measurement (microscopy)

In a message dated 12/28/2005 6:48:27 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: After about two hours of this I had to go out. In direct contrast, the heavily salted main roads are littered with vehicles doing about 15mph wherever there is the thinnest layer of slush. Roll on global

Re: Field diameter measurement (microscopy)

On 28/12/05, Don Williams, discombobulated, unleashed: >Does anyone know the exact distance >between the front surface of the *ist D >mount and the sensor? Oh yeah. 45.46mm Source: Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places,

Re: Field diameter measurement (microscopy)

On 28/12/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed: >At the moment, Scotland is cut off LOL Love the English thinking there Mike. Reminds me of the wartime headline after communications cables were severed during WWII: 'Continent cut off' :-) Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | P

Re: Field diameter measurement (microscopy)

Sounds like you may have missed your calling. You should be a weather man. Dave :-) On 12/29/05, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The thing is, we don;t have a climate in the UK, just weather. As a > depression or anti-cyclone passes through, it either pulls in cold > northerlies, icy easterli

Re: Field diameter measurement (microscopy)

Cotty wrote: On 28/12/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed: At the moment, Scotland is cut off LOL Love the English thinking there Mike. Reminds me of the wartime headline after communications cables were severed during WWII: 'Continent cut off' :-) I thought that was "Fog in

Re: Field diameter measurement (microscopy)

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:45:39 -0800 Eactivist wrote: <..> > California finally hit rainy season two weeks ago, mid Dec, after a very dry > year. Mentioned this yesterday and that we need rain. And today we are having > a BIG storm. > > I guess that means be careful what you wish for. > > Marnie ak

Re: Field diameter measurement (microscopy)

On 29/12/05, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed: >Sounds like you may have missed your calling. You should be a weather man. I am!! Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _

Re: Field diameter measurement (microscopy)

On 28/12/05, Igor Roshchin, discombobulated, unleashed: >It is still not enough for good skiing, especially here, in >Southern California. >I suggest that England should export their snow here. Hang on mate, we're trying to give it to the Welsh. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | P

Re: Field diameter measurement (microscopy)

Igor Roshchin wrote: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:45:39 -0800 Eactivist wrote: <..> California finally hit rainy season two weeks ago, mid Dec, after a very dry year. Mentioned this yesterday and that we need rain. And today we are having a BIG storm. I guess that means be careful what you wish for

Re: Field diameter measurement (microscopy)

Igor Roshchin wrote: It is still not enough for good skiing, especially here, in Southern California. I suggest that England should export their snow here. Mike Wilson replied: We would love to but it is the wrong sort (TM British Rail) Scientifically speaking, that's darn close to true.