Re: Fuji or Kodak?

camera today. I just took a picture of my one year-old getting a bath, and I I thought I was pushing it ay 1/45... Thanks, Glen On Sep 29, 2007, at 7:44 PM, Rebekah wrote: BTW Glen - I usually take my pictures with available light and use 400 speed fuji or kodak gold, and I really feel

Re: Fuji or Kodak?

Close enough to Kodak that I buy whatever's cheaper where I am. Glen Tortorella wrote: Hi all, Among the less expensive, non-pro print films, which do you prefer, Fuji or Kodak? I have found the Fuji 800 to be pretty good, and am wondering what others might think of this film

Re: Fuji or Kodak?

fuji or kodak gold, and I really feel like the Fuji outperforms the Kodak in low light situations. Its contrast and grain hold up even when I'm taking dim indoor pictures at 1/30 or even 1/4s. I like Kodak much better in outdoor light but I have to say I'm always disappointed by it when

Re: Fuji or Kodak?

Har! My medalist is older than that, in fact it's older than I am. graywolf wrote: I used to keep Fuji Superia in 100, 400, and 1600 speed in my camera bag. I have always preferred to use the slowest film I could get away with. For slides my favorite was Agfa Provdia (sp?) 100. Since I

Re: Fuji or Kodak?

I used to keep Fuji Superia in 100, 400, and 1600 speed in my camera bag. I have always preferred to use the slowest film I could get away with. For slides my favorite was Agfa Provdia (sp?) 100. Since I quite often had partial rolls developed I only bought 24x roll. Fugi Press was supposedly

RE: Fuji or Kodak?

When I could get it, I shot Agfa 200. Otherwise I shot Fuji Superia 200, though I think Kodak Gold 200 is also excellent. I liked Agfa because it seemed to render neutral colors more naturally. Bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Fuji or Kodak?

Bill Owens wrote: When I could get it, I shot Agfa 200. Otherwise I shot Fuji Superia 200, though I think Kodak Gold 200 is also excellent. I liked Agfa because it seemed to render neutral colors more naturally. Bill Has anyone seen the resurrected Agfafilm in the flesh? Doesn't look

Re: Fuji or Kodak?

BTW Glen - I usually take my pictures with available light and use 400 speed fuji or kodak gold, and I really feel like the Fuji outperforms the Kodak in low light situations. Its contrast and grain hold up even when I'm taking dim indoor pictures at 1/30 or even 1/4s. I like Kodak much better

Re: Fuji or Kodak?

was pushing it ay 1/45... Thanks, Glen On Sep 29, 2007, at 7:44 PM, Rebekah wrote: BTW Glen - I usually take my pictures with available light and use 400 speed fuji or kodak gold, and I really feel like the Fuji outperforms the Kodak in low light situations. Its contrast and grain hold up

Fuji or Kodak?

Hi all, Among the less expensive, non-pro print films, which do you prefer, Fuji or Kodak? I have found the Fuji 800 to be pretty good, and am wondering what others might think of this film, and the 100-400 speeds offered by both brands. Glen -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML

Re: Fuji or Kodak?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Among the less expensive, non-pro print films, which do you prefer, Fuji or Kodak? I have found the Fuji 800 to be pretty good, and am wondering what others might think of this film, and the 100-400 speeds offered by both brands. Glen -- PDML Pentax

Re: Fuji or Kodak?

On 9/28/07, Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Among the less expensive, non-pro print films, which do you prefer, Fuji or Kodak? I have found the Fuji 800 to be pretty good, and am wondering what others might think of this film, and the 100-400 speeds offered by both brands. Regular

Re: Fuji or Kodak?

films, which do you prefer, Fuji or Kodak? I have found the Fuji 800 to be pretty good, and am wondering what others might think of this film, and the 100-400 speeds offered by both brands. Glen -- Steve Sharpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] • http://earth.delith.com/photo_gallery.html -- PDML

RE: Fuji or Kodak?

seemed to produce superior results. Otherwise, I still preferred Fuji Superia to Kodak Gold (who knows what they're called now). Tom C. From: Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Subject: Fuji or Kodak? Date

Re: Fuji or Kodak?

Glen Tortorella wrote: Hi all, Among the less expensive, non-pro print films, which do you prefer, Fuji or Kodak? I have found the Fuji 800 to be pretty good, and am wondering what others might think of this film, and the 100-400 speeds offered by both brands. Glen Hey, Glen

Re: Fuji or Kodak?

a tripod. Fuji Reala, costs more and available only at Photo stores, always seemed to produce superior results. Otherwise, I still preferred Fuji Superia to Kodak Gold (who knows what they're called now). Tom C. From: Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: Fuji or Kodak?

Among the less expensive, non-pro print films, which do you prefer, Fuji or Kodak? I have found the Fuji 800 to be pretty good, and am wondering what others might think of this film, and the 100-400 speeds offered by both brands. In daytime, I like Agfa 100 or 400 but have trouble

Re: Fuji or Kodak?

- Original Message - From: Glen Tortorella Subject: Fuji or Kodak? Hi all, Among the less expensive, non-pro print films, which do you prefer, Fuji or Kodak? I have found the Fuji 800 to be pretty good, and am wondering what others might think of this film, and the 100-400

Re: Fuji or Kodak?

In non-pro form, Fuji is where it's at. The only Kodak print films's I'll shoot are the Portra's and 100/400UC, all of which are 'Pro' films. Glen Tortorella wrote: Hi all, Among the less expensive, non-pro print films, which do you prefer, Fuji or Kodak? I have found the Fuji 800

Re: Fuji or Kodak?

Konica 100, which is, alas, as hard to find as Agfa. I'll settle for shooting Fuji 800. I don't care as much for Fuji or Kodak in the 100-400 range in colour (but oh how sweet Kodachrome 25 was, eh?) but Reala or Royal Gold will do in a pinch, when I've run out of the stuff I like better

Re: Fuji or Kodak?

Mark!! --- Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But if you really want to have some fun get yourself some dev tanks, a few rolls of Tri-X, and process it yourself. Wh! -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: Fuji or Kodak?

are the Portra's and 100/400UC, all of which are 'Pro' films. Glen Tortorella wrote: Hi all, Among the less expensive, non-pro print films, which do you prefer, Fuji or Kodak? I have found the Fuji 800 to be pretty good, and am wondering what others might think of this film, and the 100-400 speeds

Re: Fuji or Kodak?

Hi all, Among the less expensive, non-pro print films, which do you prefer, Fuji or Kodak? I have found the Fuji 800 to be pretty good, and am wondering what others might think of this film, and the 100-400 speeds offered by both brands. Glen I tend to like the cheap fuji stuff

Re: Fuji or Kodak?

at. The only Kodak print films's I'll shoot are the Portra's and 100/400UC, all of which are 'Pro' films. Glen Tortorella wrote: Hi all, Among the less expensive, non-pro print films, which do you prefer, Fuji or Kodak? I have found the Fuji 800 to be pretty good, and am wondering what others

Re: Comparing Grain: Fuji and Kodak

Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... As we all know, Kodak made it impossible to compare the grain of their film to that of other manufacturers, by establishing their own (PGI) standard. I need a low-contrast C-41 film to take on a trip, and must decide