Re: HTML testing

I say we go with the "Doug"policy! J Sent from my iPhone > On May 11, 2016, at 10:37 AM, P.J. Alling wrote: > > We have a list policy? Does it cover breakage? > >> On 5/9/2016 11:47 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: >> Looking into it in more depth reveals that allowing

Re: HTML testing

We have a list policy? Does it cover breakage? On 5/9/2016 11:47 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: Looking into it in more depth reveals that allowing HTML through Mailman (our list software) entails suspending content filtering, which then allows file attachments through. I am hesitant to remove the

Re: HTML testing

On 5/10/2016 8:37 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: mike wilson wrote: It's made perfectly clear on joining that the list is plain text only. If someone has something to say that is important enough, they will find a way of sending it plain text. I prefer the security and lack of farkles of the

Re: HTML testing

I think I have it set correctly for conversion, and I also set it to generate an error message if someone tries to post something that's not explicitly accepted, so instead of just wondering what happened to your email and then having me tell you to try plain text, you should get the bounce.

Re: HTML testing

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:01 AM, mike wilson wrote: >> On 09 May 2016 at 22:08 Matthew Hunt wrote: >> >> Dropping HTML email without notifying the user of the problem is >> broken. I'm glad to see an effort to fix it, whether the solution is >> sending

Re: HTML testing

mike wilson wrote: >It's made perfectly clear on joining that the list is plain text only. If >someone has something to say that is important enough, they will find a way of >sending it plain text. I prefer the security and lack of farkles of the >present >situation. When we get it all sorted

Re: HTML testing

> On 09 May 2016 at 22:08 Matthew Hunt wrote: > > > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:56 PM, John wrote: > > > Isn't there some old engineering proverb that goes something like "If it > > ain't broke, don't fix it" ? > > Dropping HTML email without notifying

Re: HTML testing

I run a small mailing list through Google Groups which does allow attachments. Every so often someone will send a photo then everyone who replies to it tends to include another copy of the original attachment (I think this behaviour varies depending on software / settings). The data can add up

Re: HTML testing

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:56 PM, John wrote: > Isn't there some old engineering proverb that goes something like "If it > ain't broke, don't fix it" ? Dropping HTML email without notifying the user of the problem is broken. I'm glad to see an effort to fix it, whether the

Re: HTML testing

Isn't there some old engineering proverb that goes something like "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" ? On 5/9/2016 11:47 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: Looking into it in more depth reveals that allowing HTML through Mailman (our list software) entails suspending content filtering, which then allows

Re: HTML testing

On 9 May 2016, at 16:49, Doug Brewer wrote: > > > Note that this is not list policy I'm talking about, but rather my personal > preference. I'm willing to take into consideration arguments for and against > the ability to experience pink 36pt fonts for the PDML.

Re: HTML testing

I'm perfectly fine with any arrangement. If we go HTML, I'll be able to get rid of special mailer that I have on my cell phone, because GMail default client on android cannot send plain text. Otherwise, my life won't change either way :-). Just sayin'... Sent with AquaMail for Android

Re: HTML testing

Looking into it in more depth reveals that allowing HTML through Mailman (our list software) entails suspending content filtering, which then allows file attachments through. I am hesitant to remove the filtering, imagining all sorts of trouble with attachments, not least of which would be the

Re: HTML testing

already done... no go Sent with AquaMail for Android http://www.aqua-mail.com On 9 May 2016 18:00:17 Mark Roberts wrote: By the way: If someone could try sending HTML email to The List to see if it gets through it would be most helpful. -- Mark Roberts -

Re: HTML testing

By the way: If someone could try sending HTML email to The List to see if it gets through it would be most helpful. -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus --

Re: HTML testing

Roberts, Mark wrote: From: PDML [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] on behalf of Larry Colen [l...@red4est.com] Sent: Sunday, May 8, 2016 10:11 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: HTML testing Doug Brewer wrote: Hi, kids, we're just checking to see

RE: HTML testing

> On 09 May 2016 at 03:17 "Roberts, Mark" <mrobe...@lasell.edu> wrote: > > > > > From: PDML [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] on behalf of Larry Colen [l...@red4est.com] > Sent: Sunday, May 8, 2016 10:11 PM > To: Pent

Re: HTML testing

Mark! "We are in control" Now that is a worry. Philip Northeast www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au On 9/05/2016 12:03 PM, Doug Brewer wrote: Hi, kids, we're just checking to see if formatted text will now come through to the PDML. Carry on as if nothing has happened. Do not adjust your sets. We

RE: HTML testing

From: PDML [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] on behalf of Larry Colen [l...@red4est.com] Sent: Sunday, May 8, 2016 10:11 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: HTML testing Doug Brewer wrote: > Hi, kids, we're just checking to see if formatted text will

Re: HTML testing

Doug Brewer wrote: Hi, kids, we're just checking to see if formatted text will now come through to the PDML. Carry on as if nothing has happened. Do not adjust your sets. We are in control. I'm always learning new and interesting things on this list, for example this usage of the phrase

HTML testing

Hi, kids, we're just checking to see if formatted text will now come through to the PDML. Carry on as if nothing has happened. Do not adjust your sets. We are in control. Thanks -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE