Re: Happy 4th July!

2004-07-06 Thread John Forbes
Thanks for that Bob. The newsreels were before my time! John On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 19:44:34 +0100, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Tuesday, July 6, 2004, 2:41:23 PM, John wrote: There are two "V-signs". The normal one, indicating disrespect (to put it mildly) is made with the back of the hand

Re: Happy 4th July!

2004-07-06 Thread Bob W
Hi, Tuesday, July 6, 2004, 2:41:23 PM, John wrote: > There are two "V-signs". > The normal one, indicating disrespect (to put it mildly) is made with the > back of the hand facing away from the gesturer. > The Churchillian one, indicating victory, is made with the back of the > hand facing towa

Re: Happy 4th July!

2004-07-06 Thread John Forbes
There are two "V-signs". The normal one, indicating disrespect (to put it mildly) is made with the back of the hand facing away from the gesturer. The Churchillian one, indicating victory, is made with the back of the hand facing towards the gesturer. Of course, if Churchill were making the g

Re: Happy 4th July!

2004-07-06 Thread Steve Desjardins
For most of my life I assumed that this was the typical phallic gesture. I saw the "Long Bow" version on one of those little pre-commercial snippets on the History Channel. Even they claimed it had no proven basis in fact. If, however, there was an English gesture that made a V, maybe this was a

Re: Happy 4th July!

2004-07-06 Thread John Francis
> > > It's a nice story, but it has absolutely no basis in fact. > > (For a start, the English brandish two fingers, not just one.) > > The business about cutting off bow fingers as the origin of the > English flicking a V seems to be quite well attested. I have seen > it mentioned by professiona

Re: Happy 4th July!

2004-07-05 Thread Bob W
Hi, >> I think this whole finger thing came from wars between the French and >> the British during medieval times. Evidently the French would remove >> this finger form British prisoners so they couldn't use a long bow >> correctly, the British would brandish the middle finger to indicate its >>

Re: Happy 4th July!

2004-07-05 Thread John Francis
It's a nice story, but it has absolutely no basis in fact. (For a start, the English brandish two fingers, not just one.) > I think this whole finger thing came from wars between the French and > the British during medieval times. Evidently the French would remove > this finger form British pri

Re: Happy 4th July!

2004-07-04 Thread Norm Baugher
Not quite as good as Crecy, eh? Cotty wrote: On 4/7/04, Norm Baugher, discombobulated, offered: And I'd just like to give the finger to all you Brits! VBG Norm We take your finger, chop it off, glue on a new and better supersonic one (although costing twice as much), and give it straight ba

Re: Happy 4th July!

2004-07-04 Thread Cotty
On 4/7/04, Norm Baugher, discombobulated, offered: >And I'd just like to give the finger to all you Brits! >VBG >Norm We take your finger, chop it off, glue on a new and better supersonic one (although costing twice as much), and give it straight back to you! Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O

Re: Happy 4th July!

2004-07-04 Thread Keith Whaley
o give the finger to all you Brits! VBG Norm Shaun Canning wrote: Happy 4th July to all the Yanks on the list! Cheers Shaun

Happy 4th July!

2004-07-03 Thread Shaun Canning
Happy 4th July to all the Yanks on the list! Cheers Shaun -- _ Dr. Shaun Canning P.O. Box 21, Dampier, WA, 6714, Australia. m: 0414 967644 http://www.heritageservices.com.au [EMAIL PROTECTED] _