I feel you, John.
Tax deadline = 4/15
Demo for kitchen remodel = 4/5
The time I was to spend working on taxes was spent packing up the
kitchen and surroundings. It now leaves time to do tax paperwork
since there's no cooking to be done and 1/3 less house to
"procrastinate" in.
On Sun, Apr 11,
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 09:55:25PM -0400, wendy beard wrote:
>
> Yes, it's tax time again. And I owe them money :-(
Don't we all?
I'm married to an accountant, so we generally end up owing money to
both the feds and the state - why give them a free loan of your money?
But that's not the big dem
Thinking of selling my DA* 16-50 or my FA 31/f1.8 Ltd (silver)
I bought the 31 a few years ago from Bill Robb and have hardly ever
used it. I have and use the 43 and 77 but for some reason the 31
always gets overlooked.
Then I thought If I got rid of the 16-50, maybe I would use the 31. As
that le
On 8/4/10, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
>It also wouldn't be a walkaround lens it'd be a photograph musicians in
>available light lens.
Now yer cookin lad :)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 4/8/2010 2:50 PM, DagT wrote:
Den 8. apr. 2010 kl. 23.06 skrev Bob W:
[...]
I could, however, be distracted by an 85/1.4 but it probably
wouldn't be as handy as either of the others would be for a
"walk around" lens.
If you had an 85/1.4 you wouldn't want to walk around.
I´ve walked a
Den 8. apr. 2010 kl. 23.06 skrev Bob W:
> [...]
>>
>> I could, however, be distracted by an 85/1.4 but it probably
>> wouldn't be as handy as either of the others would be for a
>> "walk around" lens.
>
> If you had an 85/1.4 you wouldn't want to walk around.
I´ve walked a lot around with th
On 8/4/10, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
>At least if I had an 85/1.4 I wouldn't try to give it a bris so I could
>use it on a Canon.
Well if you don't want to get the best out of your glass, no biggie with
me ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On 4/8/2010 2:26 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 8/4/10, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
I could, however, be distracted by an 85/1.4 but it probably wouldn't
be as handy as either of the others would be for a "walk around" lens.
Go wash your mouth out with soap
At least if I had an 85/1.
On 8/4/10, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I could, however, be distracted by an 85/1.4 but it probably wouldn't
>be as handy as either of the others would be for a "walk around" lens.
Go wash your mouth out with soap
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
[...]
>
> I could, however, be distracted by an 85/1.4 but it probably
> wouldn't be as handy as either of the others would be for a
> "walk around" lens.
If you had an 85/1.4 you wouldn't want to walk around.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I'm thinking of diverting some of it to a new lens.
>
> The two lenses that seem to be the most useful right now would be either the
> DA* 16-50 or the DA 35 macro. If anyone stumbles across a great deal on
> either one of them, please drop me
I'm thinking of diverting some of it to a new lens.
The two lenses that seem to be the most useful right now would be either
the DA* 16-50 or the DA 35 macro. If anyone stumbles across a great
deal on either one of them, please drop me a note.
I could, however, be distracted by an 85/1.4 bu
12 matches
Mail list logo
