Re: J Focus Collar (was Re: More Pentax news/rumors (Now taking a poll))

2003-02-24 Thread Pål Jensen
- Original Message - From: "Peter Jansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 8:08 PM Subject: Re: J Focus Collar (was Re: More Pentax news/rumors (Now taking a poll)) > Pål wrote: > > According to Nikon engineers

Re: J Focus Collar (was Re: More Pentax news/rumors (Now taking a poll))

2003-02-24 Thread Camdir
<< According to Nikon engineers they have no plan to remove the aperture ring from the lenses. >> Given that G lenses were actually requested by fumbling pjs, I feel sure that this is the thin end of the wedge. It's in my bones. Kind regards Peter

Re: J Focus Collar (was Re: More Pentax news/rumors (Now taking a poll))

2003-02-24 Thread Pål Jensen
Peter wrote: >I feel > that it is certain that aperture ring lenses in AF are on their way out, > certainly in Nikon. According to Nikon engineers they have no plan to remove the aperture ring from the lenses. Apart from the entry level G-lenses, the reson for removing the aperture ring were

Re: J Focus Collar (was Re: More Pentax news/rumors (Now taking a poll))

2003-02-24 Thread Pål Jensen
Joseph wrote: > If the *ist is a medium-level camera -- which it could be from its > features -- then why package it (or even show it) with a crippled J lens? Because Canon sell loads of lenses without aperture rings > For that matter, would photographers serious enough to buy the digita

Re: J Focus Collar (was Re: More Pentax news/rumors (Now taking a poll))

2003-02-24 Thread Camdir
<< I suppose Pentax are just following the pack, as N***N have released aperture ring-less lenses of late - squarely aimed at enthusiasts. >> Not so. Part of the reason for release of G lenses was in response to requests from certain pro photogs, apparently. True some G lenses are enthusiast

Re: J Focus Collar (was Re: More Pentax news/rumors (Now taking a poll))

2003-02-23 Thread Mark Roberts
Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >If the *ist is a medium-level camera -- which it could be from its >features -- then why package it (or even show it) with a crippled J lens? They're probably showing it with the J lenses because they are the newest products. In the U.S. at least, only

Re: J Focus Collar (was Re: More Pentax news/rumors (Now taking a poll))

2003-02-23 Thread Bruce Dayton
Boy, after that long thread we had a while back about the wonderful virtues of the two dial/one handed operation of the PZ-1p, that at least those people would be looking on the J concept favorably... Bruce Sunday, February 23, 2003, 3:41:27 PM, you wrote: JT> If the *ist is a medium-level ca

J Focus Collar (was Re: More Pentax news/rumors (Now taking a poll))

2003-02-23 Thread Collin Brendemuehl
Maybe not. But we've got a lot of mech-weenies here. If you're out shooting a party where you want and need AF, then it probably wouldn't matter. These lenses are obviously not for technical work. They're for just shooting -- production work. Looking at the pics of them on the Pentax site, so