On Nov 5, 2013, at 7:07 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:41:28PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 5, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
... Now, every frame is meaningful again.
Shoot with a Polaroid
On Nov 6, 2013, at 3:02 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godfreydigio...@me.com wrote:
On Nov 5, 2013, at 7:07 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:41:28PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 5, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Nov 6, 2013, at 3:02 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godfreydigio...@me.com wrote:
On Nov 5, 2013, at 7:07 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:41:28PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 5, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Bruce Walker
On 11/6/13 6:59 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I shot some 4x5 Polaroid with my Speed Graphic back in the '80s. Great fun.
Landscapes had a painterly look. Still have a polaroid back for a 4x5, but
don't think film is available. And if it were, I'm sure it would be costly.
Paul
The Impossible
On Nov 6, 2013, at 6:47 AM, Doug Brewer d...@dougbrewerphotography.com wrote:
The Impossible Project offers Polaroid-like film, and it's is about $3 a pop
for the SX-70 size. Meaningful indeed.
I have an SX-70 around here somewhere and have seriously contemplated doing a
few frames with
On 11/6/13 10:48 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 6, 2013, at 6:47 AM, Doug Brewer d...@dougbrewerphotography.com wrote:
The Impossible Project offers Polaroid-like film, and it's is about $3 a pop
for the SX-70 size. Meaningful indeed.
I have an SX-70 around here somewhere and have
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 07:06:21AM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Nov 6, 2013, at 3:02 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godfreydigio...@me.com wrote:
On Nov 5, 2013, at 7:07 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:41:28PM -0500, Mark Roberts
On 11/5/2013 9:41 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 5, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
... Now, every frame is meaningful again.
Shoot with a Polaroid SX-70 for a while. Every frame means another $3 spent.
Good point! If I shoot large
On 11/6/2013 9:47 AM, Doug Brewer wrote:
On 11/6/13 6:59 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I shot some 4x5 Polaroid with my Speed Graphic back in the '80s. Great
fun. Landscapes had a painterly look. Still have a polaroid back for a
4x5, but don't think film is available. And if it were, I'm sure it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUu9fPzicBo
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On 5 Nov 2013, at 16:05, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUu9fPzicBo
His bollocks are utter.
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
Love it - every frame is meaningful again - LOL
I wounder if this would qualify for a
MARK!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv
Subject: Just for Bob
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUu9fPzicBo
On 5/11/13, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
His bollocks are utter.
This any better?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyVWk3nUMS8
;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
--
On 5 Nov 2013, at 22:12, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 5/11/13, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
His bollocks are utter.
This any better?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyVWk3nUMS8
;-)
Por lo menos non dice cazzate ed e un fotografo, as we say quando no parliamo
Okay, now where are the folks who complained about the Ricoh/Pentax ad
for the K-3 where the fashion photographer looked scripted?
Now, every frame is meaningful again.
Ho-lee-fuck. Gag me with a silver ring enhanced 50mm/f:1.8.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Steve Cottrell
On Nov 5, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
... Now, every frame is meaningful again.
Shoot with a Polaroid SX-70 for a while. Every frame means another $3 spent.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
On Nov 5, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
... Now, every frame is meaningful again.
Shoot with a Polaroid SX-70 for a while. Every frame means another $3 spent.
That's the sort of meaningful
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 5, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
... Now, every frame is meaningful again.
Shoot with a Polaroid SX-70 for a while. Every frame means another $3 spent.
Good point! If I shoot large format every frame will cost even more!
Surely
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:41:28PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 5, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
... Now, every frame is meaningful again.
Shoot with a Polaroid SX-70 for a while. Every frame means another $3 spent.
Good
19 matches
Mail list logo
