On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:33 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
I no longer have any of those lenses. I have only the three DA* zooms and the
DA 12-24, in addition to some FA, A and SMC primes. However, I'm sure it
works fine with the DA primes as well as the 16-45 and 50-200,
The good part for me (since I just got the K7) is that I still have a
capable camera and a good excuse. Well, it's only a K7 . . . The
rest of you will have to produce.
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 8:07 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:33 PM, paul stenquist
On 11/3/2010 6:12 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 11/3/2010 1:05 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Bob Sullivan bought a K-5 as well. I believe his arrived yesterday.
Paul
Right, he was selling his K20D for the reason :-). Soon enough the
likes of me holding on to their older cameras would be
Paul, any usage with the camera using the 16-45, 50-200 or any of the
limited, say the 77.
Dave
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:36 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
K-5 metering is definitely very good. The autofocus seems better than the K7.
I was able to shoot Grace in light that
I no longer have any of those lenses. I have only the three DA* zooms and the
DA 12-24, in addition to some FA, A and SMC primes. However, I'm sure it works
fine with the DA primes as well as the 16-45 and 50-200, both of which are
excellent lenses for the money.
Paul
On Nov 5, 2010, at 7:57
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:32 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: David J Brooks
I must say i'm impressed. So does CS5 support the K-5 then.??
Doesn't look like it's in there yet. It does support the 645D.
Right now i am looking at cameras that my computers ie LR2 and CS1
will
If you shoot RAW DNG, almost any conversion software will support the
K-5.
Paul
On Nov 4, 2010, at 9:53 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:32 PM, John Sessoms
jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: David J Brooks
I must say i'm impressed. So does CS5 support the K-5 then.??
I used to think RAW DNG was something you got at a Korean restaurant.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:16 AM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
If you shoot RAW DNG, almost any conversion software will support the K-5.
Paul
On Nov 4, 2010, at 9:53 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3,
From: David J Brooks
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:32 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: David J Brooks
I must say i'm impressed. So does CS5 support the K-5 then.??
Doesn't look like it's in there yet. It does support the 645D.
Right now i am looking at cameras that my
On Nov 4, 2010, at 2:22 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Shouldn't LR2 CS1 be able to handle .DNG files even from newer cameras?
I've been giving some thought to switching to .DNG for my raw format, at
least temporarily to experiment with it. Who knows? It might even prove
advantageous.
My
On Nov 4, 2010, at 5:28 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 2:22 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Shouldn't LR2 CS1 be able to handle .DNG files even from newer
cameras?
I've been giving some thought to switching to .DNG for my raw
format, at least temporarily to experiment with it.
From: Larry Colen
On Nov 4, 2010, at 2:22 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Shouldn't LR2 CS1 be able to handle .DNG files even from newer
cameras?
I've been giving some thought to switching to .DNG for my raw
format, at least temporarily to experiment with it. Who knows? It
might even prove
On Nov 4, 2010, at 3:53 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Larry Colen
On Nov 4, 2010, at 2:22 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Shouldn't LR2 CS1 be able to handle .DNG files even from newer
cameras?
I've been giving some thought to switching to .DNG for my raw
format, at least temporarily to
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:16 AM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
If you shoot RAW DNG, almost any conversion software will support the K-5.
Paul
When i shoot Raw with the K10D, i always choice DNG. I was thinking
along the lines if i ever cans save enough to seriously look at a D300
K-5 metering is definitely very good. The autofocus seems better than the K7. I
was able to shoot Grace in light that required f2.8 @ 1/15th at 6400 ISO. It
locked in fairly easily. Immediately on some shots. And after a second or so on
others. I have no cameras other than Pentax. to compare
Bob Sullivan bought a K-5 as well. I believe his arrived yesterday.
Paul
On Nov 3, 2010, at 1:44 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
So, Paul, I suppose you're the second one on the list after William Robb, who
got this camera. Or at least if my memory does not fail me, you are.
Congratulations. Good
On 11/3/2010 1:05 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Bob Sullivan bought a K-5 as well. I believe his arrived yesterday.
Paul
Right, he was selling his K20D for the reason :-). Soon enough the likes
of me holding on to their older cameras would be considered
photographically retarded. *broad grin*
Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Soon enough the likes
of me holding on to their older cameras would be considered
photographically retarded. *broad grin*
The opposite, Boris. In fact, I envy you. I'd rather not be spending yet
another 1300 euros tomorrow.
I really hope the K-5 wil
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:17 PM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
My K5 arrived a few hours ago. My first thought was that it was defective
and wouldn't autofocus. As usual, I'd forgotten to set the diopter to
almost blind. Once I realized that I was the only one not focusing, I shot
Boris,
Here is a quick and dirty look at ISO12800 on the K-5 from last night.
http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/K5ISO12800#
I used the DFA 100mm f2.8 macro at
f6.3, 1/500
f4,1/320
f2.8, 1/30
f2.8, 1/90
Noise reduction in Lightroom 3.2 clean them right up amazingly!
Regards, Bob S.
On
On 11/3/2010 1:27 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
I really hope the K-5 wil keep me going for at least two years, for a
change, as did the K10D.
Ralf
Replied off list...
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
On 11/3/2010 1:34 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Boris,
Here is a quick and dirty look at ISO12800 on the K-5 from last night.
http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/K5ISO12800#
I used the DFA 100mm f2.8 macro at
f6.3, 1/500
f4,1/320
f2.8, 1/30
f2.8, 1/90
Noise reduction in Lightroom 3.2 clean them
Thanks for this, Bob! Impressive!
Jack
--- On Wed, 11/3/10, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: K-5 here, high iso samples
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, November 3, 2010, 4:40 AM
On 11/3/2010 1:34 PM, Bob
I must say i'm impressed. So does CS5 support the K-5 then.??
Dave
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:17 PM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
My K5 arrived a few hours ago. My first thought was that it was defective
and wouldn't autofocus. As usual, I'd forgotten to set the diopter to
On Nov 3, 2010, at 9:54 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
I must say i'm impressed. So does CS5 support the K-5 then.??
Probably. But I'm still working with CS4, so I just save RAWs as DNG
files.
Paul
Dave
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:17 PM, P N Stenquist
pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
My K5
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:19 AM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
On Nov 3, 2010, at 9:54 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
I must say i'm impressed. So does CS5 support the K-5 then.??
Probably. But I'm still working with CS4, so I just save RAWs as DNG files.
Paul
Ah yes. I keep
From: David J Brooks
I must say i'm impressed. So does CS5 support the K-5 then.??
Doesn't look like it's in there yet. It does support the 645D.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
My K5 arrived a few hours ago. My first thought was that it was
defective and wouldn't autofocus. As usual, I'd forgotten to set the
diopter to almost blind. Once I realized that I was the only one not
focusing, I shot a few pics at ISO 6400 and 12800, just for grins. I
converted them from
I know it's not good to covet, but I I'm finding it hard to
resist Congrats on your new arrival! I trust you'll let us know
if you get the chance to do side-by-side comparisons with the k-7
k-5, at the same iso. You know, just so I can be sure I've thoroughly
tortured myself... ;)
On Nov 2, 2010, at 2:17 PM, P N Stenquist wrote:
This frame is ISO 12,800, f4 1/50th. The camera focused in my nearly dark
basement:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11890892
Damnit Paul,
Are you trying to get me to get off my ass and get a job?
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 4:17 PM
Subject: K-5 here, high iso samples
My K5 arrived a few hours ago. My first thought was that it was defective
and wouldn't autofocus. As usual, I'd forgotten to set the diopter to
almost blind. Once I realized that I was the only one not focusing
Subject: K-5 here, high iso samples
My K5 arrived a few hours ago. My first thought was that it was defective
and wouldn't autofocus. As usual, I'd forgotten to set the diopter to
almost blind. Once I realized that I was the only one not focusing, I
shot a few pics at ISO 6400 and 12800, just
Indeed. A couple more quantum leaps in noise control and maybe we can relegate
anti-shake to the history books. Just set the shutter speed at 1/8,000.
Jeffery
On Nov 2, 2010, at 6:42 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
iso 12800. I find it amazing that you even get a usable image, and
that one
Pentax content on the PDML? I find that offensive :)
Thanks for the samples. Wow.
- Peter
-Original Message-
From: P N Stenquist
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 7:47 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: K-5 here, high iso samples
My K5 arrived a few hours ago. My first
It is an interesting combination. Even on my rather pedestrian K7,
iso 1600, FA50 1.4, a few stops of SR, and that Borgish green focus
light makes me wonder if the only reason I need light anymore is so I
can see to frame the shot.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Jeffery Smith
/cameras/1ds3_af_micoadjustment.html
Cheers,
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Tue, 11/2/10, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
From: P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Subject: K-5 here, high iso samples
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, November 2
[mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P N
Stenquist
Sent: Wednesday, 3 November 2010 7:18 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: K-5 here, high iso samples
My K5 arrived a few hours ago. My first thought was that it was defective
and wouldn't autofocus. As usual, I'd forgotten to set
-5 here, high iso samples
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, November 2, 2010, 5:17 PM
My K5 arrived a few hours ago. My
first thought was that it was defective and wouldn't
autofocus. As usual, I'd forgotten to set the diopter to
almost blind. Once I realized that I
: Rick Womer
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 10:53 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K-5 here, high iso samples
That's pretty impressive! But my K7 has only 2200 exposures on it, so I'm
trying not to be =too= impressed!
Are you acquainted with the moire-based, live-view-employing
: Re: K-5 here, high iso samples
Thanks. I'll take a look.
Paul
On Nov 2, 2010, at 8:23 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
That's pretty impressive! But my K7 has only 2200 exposures on it, so I'm
trying not to be =too= impressed!
Are you acquainted with the moire-based, live-view-employing focus
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K-5 here, high iso samples
Thanks. I'll take a look.
Paul
On Nov 2, 2010, at 8:23 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
That's pretty impressive! But my K7 has only 2200 exposures on it, so I'm
trying not to be =too= impressed!
Are you acquainted with the moire
...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of paul
stenquist
Sent: Wednesday, 3 November 2010 11:17 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K-5 here, high iso samples
Thanks. I'll take a look.
Paul
On Nov 2, 2010, at 8:23 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
That's pretty impressive
So, Paul, I suppose you're the second one on the list after William
Robb, who got this camera. Or at least if my memory does not fail me,
you are.
Congratulations. Good pictures. Meanwhile it seems I will be buying
Topaz Denoise as it does wonders to my
43 matches
Mail list logo
