: K20D pictures
I didn't do well today, but I did something.
The top picture is shot at ISO6400!!
With a 100% detail shot below.
The studio thing was a 30 second light set-up shot at iso 800,
because i am
a dork sometimes.
Below it is a 100% detail as well.
None of the images recieved
Scott opined:
That second photo looks pretty darn good. I'm not sure how some of the
others couldn't see the banding in the 6400 example.
Maybe because we're old and half blind?? :-).
Seriously, I see what looks like trim in the shadow area where it moves from
dark to light, and I
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: K20D pictures
Scott opined:
That second photo looks pretty darn good. I'm not sure how some of the
others couldn't see the banding in the 6400 example.
Maybe because we're old and half blind?? :-).
I'm wondering
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: K20D pictures
Scott opined:
That second photo looks pretty darn good. I'm not sure how some of the
others couldn't see the banding in the 6400 example.
Maybe because we're old and half blind?? :-).
I'm wondering
seen it in iso800 shots!
Sorry, I'll stick with my K100d :)
later
Owen
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, 05 March, 2008 19:37
Subject: K20D pictures
I didn't do well
That could be. My monitor is calibrated to match my printer output. It's by no
means high contrast.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: K20D pictures
Scott
Yep. That's the kind of high ISO performance everyone can expect. But
some here apparently are placing more weight on the Dubai pictures
that were made with pre-release firmware. Strange logic. BTW, I find
ACR's default settings are not very accurate in terms of color
temperature with the
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's banding?
Yes it is.
Maybe at pixel peeping levels, but not at normal
viewing size and distance. And a K100d pic is far noiser, even at
1600. But to each their own.
Paul
It's clearly visible at the normal view
starting at
iso1600.
I have even seen it in iso800 shots!
Sorry, I'll stick with my K100d :)
later
Owen
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, 05 March, 2008 19:37
Subject: K20D pictures
I didn't do well
I'm missing it. I like the results shown here. I recall examples from
the *istD that showed clear multicolored banding at long exposures in
the dark. If there's anything here it doesn't get in the way of the
image. At least not for me. Although anything I'm going to shoot at
6400 would
I can't see any banding in the normal view and a bare hint of it at
100%. The 6400 output looks just as good as the excellent output from
my D300.
-Adam
On 3/6/08, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm missing it. I like the results shown here. I recall examples from
the *istD that
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: K20D pictures
Odd.
On the normal view, in the LHS shadow detail is sticks out like
proverbial to me.
Bill it's your shot. Are you seeing the same thing?
Very slightly, don't find it objectionable, and I suspect treating
Odd.
On the normal view, in the LHS shadow detail is sticks out like
proverbial to me.
Bill it's your shot. Are you seeing the same thing?
Cheers,
Dave
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't see any banding in the normal view and a bare hint of it at
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: K20D pictures
I'm missing it. I like the results shown here. I recall examples from
the *istD that showed clear multicolored banding at long exposures in
the dark. If there's anything here it doesn't get
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: K20D pictures
I'm missing it. I like the results shown here. I recall examples from
the *istD that showed clear multicolored banding at long exposures in
the dark. If there's anything here it doesn't get in the way of the
image
Thee are wonderful results. At 6400, a usable image is a benefit; a
nice image is wonderful. And the one at 800 is striking.
I'm pleased with my K10D (even the JPEGS) but it's nice to know that
Pentax is actually moving forward with its camera design and producing
some nice stuff. I really
I didn't do well today, but I did something.
The top picture is shot at ISO6400!!
With a 100% detail shot below.
The studio thing was a 30 second light set-up shot at iso 800, because i am a
dork sometimes.
Below it is a 100% detail as well.
None of the images recieved any post processing,
, 05 March, 2008 19:37
Subject: K20D pictures
I didn't do well today, but I did something.
The top picture is shot at ISO6400!!
With a 100% detail shot below.
The studio thing was a 30 second light set-up shot at iso 800, because i am
a dork sometimes.
Below it is a 100% detail as well.
None
- Original Message -
From: Owen LaPrath
Subject: Re: K20D pictures
The top image has that annoying banding I see in all K20d shots starting at
iso1600.
I have even seen it in iso800 shots!
Sorry, I'll stick with my K100d :)
Like I said, it isn't there at 3200, 6400 is only
19 matches
Mail list logo
