Hi all,
I have just uploaded the next KMP release. You will find mostly small
corrections and additions to the Lenses and Teleconverters pages,
and some major changes in the Bodies section.
Now there is an individual page for each camera body, just like with
lenses and teleconverters.
I have
I know the photo on the LX early version page has to be because Boz
don't have a good photo of the black body, but it is funny.
At 10:51 AM 12/13/2002 +0100, you wrote:
Hi all,
I have just uploaded the next KMP release. You will find mostly small
corrections and additions to the Lenses and
My SMC-K 15/3.5 is s/n 7368xxx, with a front element
diameter between 68mm and 69mm.
It's be nice to find the transition point by s/n.
Regards,
Stephen Moore
___
Programmer who create truth table write Boole sheet
, September 13, 2002 12:23 AM
Subject: Re: 15/3.5 Aspheric or not? (was: KMP Update)
Bob, we need the diameter of the front element of your lens to see if
there is a difference between aspheric and non-aspheric lenses.
(Well, maybe nobody will show up with an aspheric lens or the
difference
Not Bob but Rob in reply; ~68.6mm diameter, now just envision me with the
pointy ends of my stainless steel vernier calipers trying to avoid gouging the
front element of my SMCPA15f3.5...
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
I think we both have the non-aspheric lens. Well, I understand the A
lens is for
15mm's serial number is 8013862. I wonder what the original starting
number was and what the increment was.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: andre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:40 AM
Subject: Re: 15/3.5 Aspheric or not? (was: KMP Update
]
Subject: Re: 15/3.5 Aspheric or not? (was: KMP Update)
Not Bob but Rob in reply; ~68.6mm diameter, now just envision me with the
pointy ends of my stainless steel vernier calipers trying to
avoid gouging the
front element of my SMCPA15f3.5...
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
I think we both have
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If I'm reading this right, somebody[s] think you can tell an aspheric
lens from a NON-aspheric lens by some sort of measurement WE can make?
If I read right, disabuse yourselves of that idea.
Most aspheric optics are aspheric (vary from being
Yup. That's been confirmed. Thanks for the heads up, Rod.
keith
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 12 Sep 2002 at 15:26, Keith Whaley wrote:
If I'm reading this right, somebody[s] think you can tell an aspheric
lens from a NON-aspheric lens by some sort of measurement WE can make?
If I read
My SMC (K) 15/3.5 s/n is 505. I don't have it right here so I cannot
measure any part of it...
Antti-Pekka
---
* Antti-Pekka Virjonen * Fiskarsinkatu 7 D * GSM: +358 500 789 753 *
* Computec Oy Turku* FIN-20750 Turku Finland * Fax: +358 10 264 0777 *
Hi all,
I am in the middle of a big KMP update, but since I've managed to get in
a few interesting pictures lately, I am making this intermediate
update...
* http://kmp.BDimitrov.de/bodies/photos/LX_FB-1_FC-1.jpg
* Optical diagrams for FA* 200/4 Macro, FA 28-90/3.5-5.6,
FA28-105/3.2-4.5
Hi all,
I have just uploaded the newest version of the KMP. There are several
things that I would like to point out:
1. I now have a page dedicated to each lens. For most lenses these
pages contain only the technical data, but I would like to _SLOWLY_ add
descriptions and optical evaluations
Recently David A. Mann wrote:
The previous release was just fine. I am not sure why my old browser
OK, I know the problem then. I will fix it in the next release (I have
made the background of the orange-black image transparent; but the
background of the frame black; your browser
Hi David,
Recently David A. Mann wrote:
My old web browser (IE3.0) doesn't understand the background colours in
your frames. It renders the text in your top and bottom frames as orange on
a grey background which is just about impossible to read :(
:( The problem here must be the
Boz,
The updates to the prime lenses you mention look excellent. You have added a
lot of texture with the comments and figuring out which hoods were
appropriate must have been a pain.
My only critique is the resolution test numbers. These seem a bit ambitious.
As Mike pointed out, there
Hi all,
I am a bit surprised that there have been no comments on the latest KMP
release. I consider this particular update to be a major one, and I would
like to have some feedback.
For those who have time and interest, take a look at the page dedicated to
prime lenses. Pay special attention
Recently [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My only critique is the resolution test numbers. These seem a bit ambitious.
As Mike pointed out, there is more to lens quality than resolution. In
addition, I find it a bit confusing to see Yoshihiko's and Fred's numbers
together as they are so
Footnote on the K bodies page has a typo. It reads:
"i = In addition to all differences shown here, the non-SE body
has a split-image/matte viewing screen while the SE body has a
split-image/microprism/matte."
It should be:
"i = In addition to all differences shown here, the non-SE body
has a
Oops ! I wanted to say Z10-PZ10
I tried to findout for you what was the film advance in fps
for the Z1/PZ1
sorry
Cyril
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery
Oh, and as long as I'm whining: It'd be nice to have text
navigation options. It's a personal thing, I admit, but I *hate*
imagemaps (and the lack of individual ALT or TITLE tags for the
links makes navigation difficult for people with visual
disabilities--not that I'd expect too many of them to
Recently Mark Roberts wrote:
Oh, and as long as I'm whining: It'd be nice to have text
navigation options. It's a personal thing, I admit, but I *hate*
imagemaps (and the lack of individual ALT or TITLE tags for the
links makes navigation difficult for people with visual
disabilities--not
Hi Boz,
I am a bit surprised that there have been no comments on
the latest KMP release. I consider this particular
update to be a major one, and I would like to have some
feedback.
I always refer to your site first whenever I have questions
about Pentax. It's so resourceful, and I
Are you sure that the 100/4 Bellows, A* 200/2.8, A* 200/4 Macro, K 500/4.5, A* 1200/8
are no longer available? They are still present in Pentax latest price list (January
2001) and present on various Pentax web pages (I guess. I haven't cheked them for
awhile but see Pentax Scandinavia, Japan
Cyril MARION wrote:
I tried to findout for you what was the film advance in fps for the Z1/PZ1
to complete your page http://www.phred.org/pentax/k/bodies/Z-PZ/index.html
but the information is even not written in my paper manual ! I have to
measure it with a dummy film and a
Recently =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E5l_Jensen?= wrote:
Are you sure that the 100/4 Bellows, A* 200/2.8, A* 200/4 Macro, K 500/4.5, A*
1200/8 are no longer available? They are still present in Pentax latest price list
(January 2001) and present on various Pentax web pages (I guess. I haven't cheked
Hi all,
I have just made a new release of the KMP. I hope you enjoy it...
Cheers,
Boz
--
_\\|//_ Imagination is more important than knowledge...
0(` O-O ')0 A. Einstein
===ooO=(_)=Ooo===
Recently Peter Alling wrote:
This is probably a lot of work but I think it might
be useful, or at least interesting, to mention which
of the modern lenses have plastic vs metal lens
mounts.
Hi Peter,
This has been suggested before. I have not had the time to do it yet. I
am also not
Boz,
You amaze me, your methodology is much simpler than
I thought, (and you get most of the other people on
the list to do much of the work for you), and it
seems to work. That's a good suggestion, I'll put
that on my list of things to do.
--Pete
--- Bojidar Dimitrov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I have just updated the KMP (http://www.phred.org/pentax/k/). There are no
revolutionary changes but there are a lot of small changes. There is one
interesting thing: "Pentax top bodies" in the FAQ section.
Cheers,
Boz
---
15.01.2001
*
This is probably a lot of work but I think it might
be useful, or at least interesting, to mention which
of the modern lenses have plastic vs metal lens
mounts. I have no idea about where to start to look
for this information, otherwise I would begin to
compile the data myself.
--- Bojidar
30 matches
Mail list logo
