Re: KMP update (2)

2001-03-22 Thread Rfsindg
Boz, The updates to the prime lenses you mention look excellent. You have added a lot of texture with the comments and figuring out which hoods were appropriate must have been a pain. My only critique is the resolution test numbers. These seem a bit ambitious. As Mike pointed out, there

KMP update (2)

2001-03-22 Thread Bojidar Dimitrov
Hi all, I am a bit surprised that there have been no comments on the latest KMP release. I consider this particular update to be a major one, and I would like to have some feedback. For those who have time and interest, take a look at the page dedicated to prime lenses. Pay special attention

Re: KMP update (2)

2001-03-22 Thread Bojidar Dimitrov
Recently [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My only critique is the resolution test numbers. These seem a bit ambitious. As Mike pointed out, there is more to lens quality than resolution. In addition, I find it a bit confusing to see Yoshihiko's and Fred's numbers together as they are so

Re: KMP update (2)

2001-03-22 Thread Mark Roberts
Footnote on the K bodies page has a typo. It reads: "i = In addition to all differences shown here, the non-SE body has a split-image/matte viewing screen while the SE body has a split-image/microprism/matte." It should be: "i = In addition to all differences shown here, the non-SE body has a

RE: KMP update (2)

2001-03-22 Thread Cyril MARION
Oops ! I wanted to say Z10-PZ10 I tried to findout for you what was the film advance in fps for the Z1/PZ1 sorry Cyril - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery

Re: KMP update (2)

2001-03-22 Thread Mark Roberts
Oh, and as long as I'm whining: It'd be nice to have text navigation options. It's a personal thing, I admit, but I *hate* imagemaps (and the lack of individual ALT or TITLE tags for the links makes navigation difficult for people with visual disabilities--not that I'd expect too many of them to

Re: KMP update (2)

2001-03-22 Thread Bojidar Dimitrov
Recently Mark Roberts wrote: Oh, and as long as I'm whining: It'd be nice to have text navigation options. It's a personal thing, I admit, but I *hate* imagemaps (and the lack of individual ALT or TITLE tags for the links makes navigation difficult for people with visual disabilities--not

Re: KMP update (2)

2001-03-22 Thread Takehiko Ueda
Hi Boz, I am a bit surprised that there have been no comments on the latest KMP release. I consider this particular update to be a major one, and I would like to have some feedback. I always refer to your site first whenever I have questions about Pentax. It's so resourceful, and I

Re: KMP update (2)

2001-03-22 Thread Carlos Royo
Cyril MARION wrote: I tried to findout for you what was the film advance in fps for the Z1/PZ1 to complete your page http://www.phred.org/pentax/k/bodies/Z-PZ/index.html but the information is even not written in my paper manual ! I have to measure it with a dummy film and a