Re: KP will not be the APS-C flagman, err. flagship?

2017-01-26 Thread Igor PDML-StR
Ergh!... I shouldn't be sending any messages before the breakfast... ... or maybe even until I have a good night sleep. But even then, I should have a breakfast first. ;-) P. J. Alling Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:29:32 -0800 wrote: Flagman? Shouldn't that be Flagship? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss

Re: KP will not be the APS-C flagman?

2017-01-26 Thread P. J. Alling
to make me prefer a K-3 for almost every reason. On 1/26/2017 8:26 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote: I usually do not go into speculations about Pentax plans, but here, the situation seems to be rather logical. (But who said that Pentax is always logical?!) It is very logical if KP is _not_ t

Re: KP will not be the APS-C flagman?

2017-01-26 Thread Steve Cottrell
On 26/1/17, Igor PDML-StR, discombobulated, unleashed: >The hat has spoken! Amen! -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production -- _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

KP will not be the APS-C flagman?

2017-01-26 Thread Igor PDML-StR
I usually do not go into speculations about Pentax plans, but here, the situation seems to be rather logical. (But who said that Pentax is always logical?!) It is very logical if KP is _not_ the flagman of the APS-C lineup. Based on the specs and trends, it sounds like it would