Re: Kodak, a nuclear power

2012-05-17 Thread Charles Robinson
On May 16, 2012, at 1:26, David Mann wrote: > On May 16, 2012, at 2:36 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: > >> Probably the most dangerous time for the fuel being stolen was after >> decommissioning. It was packed ready and ready to go somewhere. While in >> the reactor stealing it would have been probl

Re: Kodak, a nuclear power

2012-05-17 Thread P. J. Alling
On 5/17/2012 1:03 PM, steve harley wrote: on 2012-05-15 8:36 P. J. Alling wrote There are a lot of research reactors in sitting around not offending anyone. I probably sit with 100 miles of at least 25 here claims to be a list of all the research reactors in the united states:

Re: Kodak, a nuclear power

2012-05-17 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Back in the Early 1990s, my son was a physics major at Valparaiso University in Indiana, and was an intern on a NASA-funded research project. When I visited, I was shown their subcritical nuclear reactor, which apparently is still there: http://www.valpo.edu/cas/departments/facts/physics.php Dan M

Re: Kodak, a nuclear power

2012-05-17 Thread steve harley
on 2012-05-15 8:36 P. J. Alling wrote There are a lot of research reactors in sitting around not offending anyone. I probably sit with 100 miles of at least 25 here claims to be a list of all the research reactors in the united states: -- PDML Pent

Re: Kodak, a nuclear power

2012-05-16 Thread John Sessoms
From: David Mann On May 16, 2012, at 2:36 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: Probably the most dangerous time for the fuel being stolen was after decommissioning. It was packed ready and ready to go somewhere. While in the reactor stealing it would have been problematic. Don't underestimate the stupi

Re: Kodak, a nuclear power

2012-05-15 Thread David Mann
On May 16, 2012, at 2:36 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: > Probably the most dangerous time for the fuel being stolen was after > decommissioning. It was packed ready and ready to go somewhere. While in > the reactor stealing it would have been problematic. Don't underestimate the stupidity of thieve

Re: Kodak, a nuclear power

2012-05-15 Thread Boris Liberman
Here goes the American security... Along with the Kodak stock... On 5/15/2012 11:36, Larry Colen wrote: http://gizmodo.com/5909961/kodak-had-a-secret-weapons+grade-nuclear-reactor-hidden-in-a-basement -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@p

RE: Kodak, a nuclear power

2012-05-15 Thread Bob W
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of > Larry Colen > > http://gizmodo.com/5909961/kodak-had-a-secret-weapons+grade-nuclear- > reactor-hidden-in-a-basement There used to be one about half a mile up the road from here in the Royal Naval College for the students

Re: Kodak, a nuclear power

2012-05-15 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 6:10 AM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote: > Well, that's the way it is, isn't it? One minute set for world domination, > the next minute bankrupt. > > Pinky: "What are we going to do tonight, Brain?" > > Brain: "The same thing we do every night: Try to take over the world!"

Re: Kodak, a nuclear power

2012-05-15 Thread Darren Addy
I've had times at work where I thought my boss was going to "go nuclear" but at Kodak he really did! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: Kodak, a nuclear power

2012-05-15 Thread Steven Desjardins
Yeah, but the half life is better than mine. On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote: > >> Sounds like a good investment. > > Uranium is a depreciating asset. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://p

Re: Kodak, a nuclear power

2012-05-15 Thread P. J. Alling
There are a lot of research reactors in sitting around not offending anyone. I probably sit with 100 miles of at least 25 Weapons grade is in the eye of the beholder. It makes a much better headline from the standpoint of an editor trying to attract eyeballs than the absolute truth. Proba

RE: Kodak, a nuclear power

2012-05-15 Thread John Sessoms
Somehow, I just have a hard time believing the uranium in that "reactor" was enriched to weapons grade. From: Larry Colen http://gizmodo.com/5909961/kodak-had-a-secret-weapons+grade-nuclear-reactor-hidden-in-a-basement -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/list

RE: Kodak, a nuclear power

2012-05-15 Thread knarftheria...@gmail.com
rted without proof can be dismissed without proof." -- Christopher Hitchens --- Original Message --- From: Larry Colen Sent: May 15, 2012 5/15/12 To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Subject: Kodak, a nuclear power http://gizmodo.com/5909961/kodak-had-a-secret-weapons+grade-nuc

Re: Kodak, a nuclear power

2012-05-15 Thread Matthew Hunt
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote: > Sounds like a good investment. Uranium is a depreciating asset. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follo

Re: Kodak, a nuclear power

2012-05-15 Thread Steven Desjardins
Sounds like a good investment. On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Larry Colen wrote: > http://gizmodo.com/5909961/kodak-had-a-secret-weapons+grade-nuclear-reactor-hidden-in-a-basement > -- > Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net

Kodak, a nuclear power

2012-05-15 Thread Larry Colen
http://gizmodo.com/5909961/kodak-had-a-secret-weapons+grade-nuclear-reactor-hidden-in-a-basement -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link di