Boris, I recently did exactly what you are planning and experimented at a
friends wedding, knowing that they had already hired another photographer
for their formal shots. I decided to "have a play" and used Fuji Press Pro
800. The resulting grain was a pain in the butt. It wasn't significant
en
"Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I wouldn't recommend shooting anything for a wedding with film faster
>than 400 unless you are going for a REALLY "artsy" look
...or unless you're shooting medium format. ;-)
It recently occurred to me that this is probably the real reason d
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I wouldn't recommend shooting anything for a wedding with
> film faster
> >than 400 unless you are going for a REALLY "artsy" look
>
> ...or unless you're shoo
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
> little "experiment". These shots were shot handheld (and leaning against
> poles/church pews etc in place of a tripod) using only available light, in a
> dark church with a 135mm prime lens, and T400cn film. Not what I would
> refer to as my "
this may add to the
grain,but for band
shots grain is good:-)
> Hi!
>
> So, finally here is the question : what is better: Kodak TMAX 3200
> or Fuji Press Pro 1600 scanned and turned b/w digitally?
>
> One last detail, the resulting shots are
On 31 Dec 2003 at 10:34, Boris Liberman wrote:
> So, finally here is the question : what is better: Kodak TMAX 3200
> or Fuji Press Pro 1600 scanned and turned b/w digitally?
I'd go with the TMZ or Delta 3200, shoot it at 1600 (one stop push) and it will
provide a pretty usable con
I can buy either Kodak TMAX 3200 (proper B/W film)
> or Fuji Press Pro 1600 (color C-41). I used Fuji to shoot basketball
> and was satisfied. However it is color.
>
> So, finally here is the question : what is better: Kodak TMAX 3200
> or Fuji Press Pro 1600 scanned and turned b
Hi!
>> In my experience, TMAX 3200 is liable to show grain aliasing when scanned
>> even at 2900dpi. If you use it, I would recommend scanning it at
>> significantly higher dpi.
>>
>> Grain aliasing is when the size & spacing of film grain is close to the
>> size & spacing of the CCD sensor, whic
8 matches
Mail list logo
