I have the F35-135 f3.5-4.5. Heavy and slowish AF, but a nice range
and reasonable IQ. The big problem is that they are hard to find. I
think I paid about $80.
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Collin Brendemuehl
wrote:
> Of the various 35-105 (or similar class) lenses out there,
> which would y
I have the 24-90 and use it a lot--it is one beautiful lens, especially for
event shooting. While it's not constant aperture, f/3.5-4.5 is less than a
stop. It's also lighter than the PZ FA 28-105.
I have no experience with the other two.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Mon, 5/2/
Collin,
I like and have used the original FA28-105/4-5.6 and A35-103/3.5.
My preference would be the FA for autofocus and overall quality.
(I almost threw away the PZ-1 on account of the miserable kit FA28-80)
The A35-105 is heavy glass and good with an occasional unexpected flare
from the big fron
I had the A35-105 for many years and liked it a lot. I never got a chance to
try it on a dslr.
DagT
>Of the various 35-105 (or similar class) lenses out there,
>which would you choose?
>
>A35-105/3.5
>FA24-90
>Tokina 35-105/3.5-4.3
>
>or other?
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Collin Brendemuehl
>http://kery
Of the various 35-105 (or similar class) lenses out there,
which would you choose?
A35-105/3.5
FA24-90
Tokina 35-105/3.5-4.3
or other?
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
http://kerygmainstitute.org
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose"
-- Jim Elliott
-
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:35:16PM +, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
> So I'll want a really sharp zoom in the 28-105 class.
> Any recommendations?
I'm one of the satisfied users of the old PZ 28-105/4.0-5.6 I got
with my PZ-1p; It was an excellent lens of it's day, although the
fact that is not an
, Australia
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Collin
Brendemuehl
Sent: Sunday, 1 May 2011 8:35 AM
To: pdml
Subject: Learned something today
Today I shot the conference.
It was in a church and a modest attendance of about 100.
The
On Apr 30, 2011, at 3:35 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
> Today I shot the conference.
> It was in a church and a modest attendance of about 100.
> The ideal lens would have been a 28-105 or something similar.
> Since this conference is the brainchild of my sister, I've
> been drafted to shoot it
Today I shot the conference.
It was in a church and a modest attendance of about 100.
The ideal lens would have been a 28-105 or something similar.
Since this conference is the brainchild of my sister, I've
been drafted to shoot it next year.
Before I do, though, I will need a better lens in that r
9 matches
Mail list logo
