- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling"
Subject: Re: Longing for Film
On 3/10/2010 4:14 PM, Bob W wrote:
I've longed believed the relative randomness of film grain
distribution adds a certain organic feel that's missing from digital
I'm longing for
On 3/10/2010 4:14 PM, Bob W wrote:
I've longed believed the relative randomness of film grain
distribution adds a certain organic feel that's missing from digital
I'm longing for an organic feel...
You mean orgasmic, don't you?
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\font
2010/3/10 Doug Franklin :
> On 2010-03-10 11:59, Bruce Dayton wrote:
>>
>> Well I can vouch for that! I have been scanning for the last week
>> and I hate it! Vuescan/Minolta Scan Dual II and batch mode helps
>> some, but it is still painful.
>
> You and me, both. I've got hundreds of rolls arou
> I've longed believed the relative randomness of film grain
> distribution adds a certain organic feel that's missing from digital
I'm longing for an organic feel...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Sure I like not scanning... but when I do there always seems to be a
pleasant surprise awaiting.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Doug Franklin
wrote:
> On 2010-03-10 11:59, Bruce Dayton wrote:
>>
>> Well I can vouch for that! I have been scanning for the last week
>> and I hate it! Vuescan/Min
On 2010-03-10 11:59, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Well I can vouch for that! I have been scanning for the last week
and I hate it! Vuescan/Minolta Scan Dual II and batch mode helps
some, but it is still painful.
You and me, both. I've got hundreds of rolls around here that need
scanning. And doing
On 10/3/10, Evan Hanson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I've longed believed the relative randomness of film grain
>distribution adds a certain organic feel that's missing from digital
>images.
There's an app for that.
>But maybe I'm just getting retro-grouchy in my middle
>agedness.
And there's
- Original Message -
From: "paul stenquist"
Subject: Re: Longing for Film
Grain is okay, but I much prefer the silken texture of a contact print
made from an 8x10 negative. They almost look like -- well -- high
resolution digital! (ducking and running:-).
That's
On Mar 10, 2010, at 2:15 PM, Evan Hanson wrote:
> I've longed believed the relative randomness of film grain distribution adds
> a certain organic feel that's missing from digital images.But maybe I'm
> just getting retro-grouchy in my middle agedness.
>
Grain is okay, but I much prefer th
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Bob W wrote:
> Film is dead...
Also books, reading, and critical thinking.
Darren Addy
Kearney, NE
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above a
I've longed believed the relative randomness of film grain
distribution adds a certain organic feel that's missing from digital
images.But maybe I'm just getting retro-grouchy in my middle
agedness.
Evan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pd
Film is dead - it's called analogue now.
>
> I don't think there is anything wrong with longing for film.
> It really doesn't matter to me if the longing is out of
> nostalgia or because one feels a certain technical difference
> that it produces.
>
[...]
I don't think there is anything wrong with longing for film. It really
doesn't matter to me if the longing is out of nostalgia or because one
feels a certain technical difference that it produces.
A builder may love the buildings he produces, but that doesn't mean he
doesn'
I'm making my way through this huge repository of photos ... negatives
made in the '50s and '60 by my grandfather, uncle, mother and father
... and they're captivating, delightful photographs.
I can't wait to be done capturing them so that I can forget about film forever.
What makes them special
Well I can vouch for that! I have been scanning for the last week
and I hate it! Vuescan/Minolta Scan Dual II and batch mode helps
some, but it is still painful.
At this point, I have zero interest in film. I look back on my stuff
and find that I have improved my skills quite a bit over the yea
Darkrooms take up a lot of space, scanners not so much. (I miss b&W
printing, I'm not sure I'm still good at it though).
On 3/10/2010 9:24 AM, David Savage wrote:
I like shooting film (B&W, in the LX with the FA 31mm f1.8), I even
like developing it.
It's the scanning of film that I hate with
Sometimes I'll overlay a grain pattern, supposed to be TMAX but with a
bit of play with the layer it can look kind of like Tri-X, on my B&W
conversions. It's funny but it seems to bring out detail where it's
been minimized by the digital process. Sometimes I miss film,. but
don't feel like me
I like shooting film (B&W, in the LX with the FA 31mm f1.8), I even
like developing it.
It's the scanning of film that I hate with a fundamentalist passion.
On 10 March 2010 11:11, Tom C wrote:
> Over the past several years I've scanned and reviewed earlier scanned
> images I've made. There is
No but isn't this ironic... next thing you know you'll have a CD
player with a built-in vinyl effect preamp...
2010/3/10 Tom C :
> Over the past several years I've scanned and reviewed earlier scanned
> images I've made. There is something about them that's undefinable
> and draws me to them over
Over the past several years I've scanned and reviewed earlier scanned
images I've made. There is something about them that's undefinable
and draws me to them over my digitally captured images.
I can't say what it is. Possibly a sense of being closer to reality,
in the same vein that I recognize a
20 matches
Mail list logo
