Re: MB /frame size

2004-11-19 Thread Ronald Arvidsson
better resolution than the *ist D, but my scanner couldn't cope. All the best Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: Ronald Arvidsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 18. november 2004 19:35 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: MB /frame size

Re: MB /frame size

2004-11-18 Thread Ronald Arvidsson
You will have more detail in the 6x6 since there is more detail in the 6x6 negative than the 24x36. Its two equations basically resiloution6x6*resolution-scanner=scanned image6x6 resolution24-36*resolution scanner= scanned image24x36 However, you are right in the sense that you can get out more

Re: MB /frame size

2004-11-18 Thread Jack Davis
Thanks, Ron, Realizing that the 6x6 records more detail, it at long last, occurred to me that I might be limiting it's recovery by using a single scan level for both formats. My excuse is that I was thinking (?) in terms of square inches rather that frame size. Jack --- Ronald Arvidsson [EMAIL

Re: MB /frame size

2004-11-18 Thread Ronald Arvidsson
Actually, I find that I get more detail (subjectively) from a 6x6 scan and discussed this with some people at a camerashop. they told me that I probably was right since they though that the quality of the 6x6 film also is bettter. I dont know it this is true - but it could be that the 6x6 has

RE: MB /frame size

2004-11-18 Thread Jens Bladt
. All the best Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: Ronald Arvidsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 18. november 2004 19:35 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: MB /frame size Actually, I find that I get more detail (subjectively

Re: MB /frame size

2004-11-17 Thread Sam Jost
Guess I don't have enough to do:) I agree. Sam

Re: MB /frame size

2004-11-17 Thread Jens Bladt
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 17. november 2004 21:56 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: MB /frame size If a 6x6cm frame is scanned at 100MB and a 35mm frame is scanned at 100MB, will the 35mm frame relinquish a greater share of its information than will the 6x6? IOW, in order to achieve an equal scan

Re: MB /frame size

2004-11-17 Thread Tim Sherburne
Jack... I hesitate to get sucked into the quagmire of scanning, but if you scan a 35mm neg and get a resulting file of 100MB (!), you're using a scan resolution of 3,500 ppi, which, IIRC, is approaching the maximum information density of consumer 35mm color print films. Scanning a 6x6 neg at the

MB /frame size

2004-11-17 Thread Jack Davis
If a 6x6cm frame is scanned at 100MB and a 35mm frame is scanned at 100MB, will the 35mm frame relinquish a greater share of its information than will the 6x6? IOW, in order to achieve an equal scan saturation, would it be necessary to scan the 6x6 at 360MB? (6x6 area =3.6 times that of the 35)

Re: MB /frame size

2004-11-17 Thread Jack Davis
Thanks Sam for allowing me to reply to Tim on your email. Tim, I appreciate the info info and link. I suppose that embedded somewhere in that link is my answer, but a couple clarifications..if I may and I'll go away. Did you arrive at 3,500 ppi by multiplying 35mm by 100mb? Coincidence? How did