Great!!. Another good reason to get the MZ-S :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is why the MZ-S has the "dial-in the first frame number" feature.
> If it didn't and you used the conventional lens-cap-on, 1/6000th at
> f/22 technique, the original imprinting would be overwritten with the
> ab
This is why the MZ-S has the "dial-in the first frame number" feature. If it
didn't and you used the conventional lens-cap-on, 1/6000th at f/22
technique, the original imprinting would be overwritten with the above data.
Regards
Jim
Christien Bunting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks fo
paul,
Thanks for the extensive test. From your results, I'm guessing that
Mid-roll change will work with data imprinting because the body would
know how many frames it skipped. If you used the old method -fire
until the right frame (kept dark of course), would probably double
imprint the first
To anyone that's still interested!
Thank you to all the people who responded to this question - very useful.
Experiment:
I thought I'd give a quick update based on the test I finally got round to
performing:
1. Set the MZ-S NOT to fully pull a completed film back into the canister
2. Take a manu
4 matches
Mail list logo