OK so the list isn't exactly short of these but here are my impressions
after receiving a MZ-S from my wife for my birthday whilst on holiday last
week (yes she's wonderful, only thing that puzzles me is how did she know?
:)):
1. The general feel and finish are superb. The grip is somewhat larger
> > Of course not. Aren't I the most long-winded typist you know?
> I think that title belongs to Glenn, but we love you both.
*blush*
-- Glenn
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Mike Johnston wrote:
>
> Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> > Oh, you're going to leave us hanging with just that? :-P
>
> Of course not. Aren't I the most long-winded typist you know?
I think that title belongs to Glenn, but we love you both.
In a manly sort of way, of course.
Welcome back.
tv
-
Th
ent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 5:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: MZ-S impressions
>
> Gianfranco wrote:
>
> > It is definitely small, and ...
>
>
> I keep hearing that the MZ-S is small but the first thing I noticed was
> how big it was.
Gianfranco wrote:
> It is definitely small, and ...
I keep hearing that the MZ-S is small but the first thing I noticed was how big it was.
My MZ-S has the same height as my LX (top of prism). However, the MZ-S has higher
shoulders so volumetrically its "higher" than the LX. The MZ-S is ab
Gianfranco wrote:
GI> What I do not like is the layout of the focus indicator. I think one can
GI> get used to it in little time, but I thought it's awkward to look out of the
GI> frame to see where the hell the camera is focusing at when in automatic. Not a
GI> great problem, but a bit annoying.
Darren & Tara Sutherland wrote:
shown.
>
> First I've totally omitted comments on the shutter-lag (or lack thereof!).
> I found the shutter button to be similar in nature to the LX's. The first
> stage for focusing was, however, quite sensitive; in fact there seemed to be
> very little throw t
Darren,
thanks for sharing your impressions and describing those
characteristics of MZ-S of which many haven't been mentioned yet. I'm
glad you too liked the camera.
Matjaz
> Oops, I forgot to mention a couple of things regarding the MZ-S body I was
> shown.
>
> First I've totally omitted co
Oops, I forgot to mention a couple of things regarding the MZ-S body I was
shown.
First I've totally omitted comments on the shutter-lag (or lack thereof!).
I found the shutter button to be similar in nature to the LX's. The first
stage for focusing was, however, quite sensitive; in fact there s
9 matches
Mail list logo
