frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What a freaking minefield!
>
>When I was poking around the internet yesterday, just to get a feel
>for what's up with common law marriage in the US, I came across an
>article that said that common law marriage had been legal in
>Pennsylvania, until a rec
You sure that's true, even in the US. I know that Common Law Marriage
no longer exists in Connecticut but I thought
it might still be in existence in other States, thought at the moment I
can't thank of which ones.
frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 21:01:41 -0500, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL
Hi,
[...[
> Now you're saying a law was recently passed (which I take to mean that
> the state legislature has passed a statute on the matter).
> Goes to show you that:
> a) Never listen to me (but you know that already, Mark ),
> and,
> b) Ya gotta be a practising lawyer in a particular jurisdi
On Sun, 07 Nov 2004 08:37:52 -0500, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Pennsylvania just passed a law this year *ending* the concept of common
> law marriage. OK with me: The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
> just decided to let "unmarried domestic partners" be included in health
"Daniel J. Matyola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Some American state still recognize common law marriage, including
>Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Kansas and Colorado. Many other states,
>including New York, will recognize a common law marriage that was
>validly created in another state.
Pen
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 14:43:51 CST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was fairly certain, living in Texas, that I had heard there WAS such a thing
> as common law marriage in Texas. A quick search turned up, among many others,
> this site
>
> http://www.divorcelawtexas.com/txpages/Al
Daniel wrote:
> Some American state still recognize common law marriage, including
> Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Kansas and Colorado. Many other states,
> including New York, will recognize a common law marriage that was
> validly created in another state.
>
> after frank theriault wrote:
Some American state still recognize common law marriage, including
Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Kansas and Colorado. Many other states,
including New York, will recognize a common law marriage that was
validly created in another state.
frank theriault wrote:
Common law marriage no longer ex
i thought louisiana has its laws derived from napoleonoc code (correct me
if i'm wrong).
mishka
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 13:45:37 -0500, frank theriault
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 08:19:11 -0800, Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is that in all of North America, Frank?
On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 08:19:11 -0800, Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is that in all of North America, Frank?
>
AFAIK, it's every country that derives their legal system from the
English system (ie: Common Law countries - ironically).So,
pretty much Canada, the US, Britain and most,
Is that in all of North America, Frank?
keith
frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 21:01:41 -0500, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, Lisa and I have lived together long enough that we might
actually be considered married under common law. In some places. Don't
know about Penn
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 21:01:41 -0500, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, Lisa and I have lived together long enough that we might
> actually be considered married under common law. In some places. Don't
> know about Pennsylvania.
>
> Technically, she's my Personal Pathologist and
12 matches
Mail list logo
