Larry Colen wrote:
On Aug 28, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Bob W wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Larry Colen
yes. If it was up to me I'd replace all the primes with more easily
divisible numbers. It would save us all a lot of trouble.
Bob W wrote:
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Joseph McAllister
Something to consider next time the max dimensions are reviewed.
Good Lord, Bob, you do need a hobby.
Perhaps I should take up photograph
"rounding error
I thought rounding error was how you got aspherical lenses."
www.instantrimshot.com
>> rounding error
>
> I thought rounding error was how you got aspherical lenses.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> On Aug 28, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Bob W wrote:
>
>>> From:
On Aug 28, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Bob W wrote:
>> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
>> Larry Colen
>
>
>>> yes. If it was up to me I'd replace all the primes with more easily
>>> divisible numbers. It would save us all a lot of trouble.
>>
>> Now that you ment
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> Larry Colen
> > yes. If it was up to me I'd replace all the primes with more easily
> > divisible numbers. It would save us all a lot of trouble.
>
> Now that you mention it, I realize why one of my lenses is 31mm, that
On Aug 28, 2011, at 7:14 AM, Bob W wrote:
>> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
>> Steven Desjardins
>>
>> It's a lovely hobby.
>>
>> I am equally impressed by your numeristics.
>
> Thanks, but I've really like coin-collecting.
>
>> I also like numbers l
> >> I am equally impressed by your numeristics.
> >
> > Thanks, but I've really like coin-collecting.
>
> .but - I - really like coin collecting.
>or .but I've really - liked - coin collecting.
>
> Joseph McAllister
"but I've never really liked coin-collecting".
Or proof-readin
On Aug 28, 2011, at 07:14 , Bob W wrote:
>> I am equally impressed by your numeristics.
>
> Thanks, but I've really like coin-collecting.
…but - I - really like coin collecting…
or …but I've really - liked - coin collecting…
Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com
http://gall
I've been resizing to 800 on long end, because that barely fits on the
screen if you have a lot of status bars on your browser. Now I may rethink
that.
But I concur with the rest, hey, there's a lot of opportunity out there
for taking "pretty pictures."
Heh. Marnie ;-) Unless you want to
960 = (2*2*2*2*2*2)*3*5 = (2^6)*3*5
so it's divisible by 2, 3, 5, and lots of powers of 2.
Prime decomposition from elementary Number Theory.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Bob W wrote:
>> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
>> Brian Walters
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 07:54:04AM -0400, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> It's a lovely hobby.
>
> I am equally impressed by your numeristics. I also like numbers like
> 720 because I can do the math in my head more easily.
It still comes a bit of a surprise to me that this isn't "obvious" -
I've bee
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> David J Brooks
>
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 3:11 AM, Bob W wrote:
>
> > 2, 4, 5, 6, 8,
>
> Who do we appreciate
>
_whom_ do we appreciate!
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/li
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> Steven Desjardins
>
> It's a lovely hobby.
>
> I am equally impressed by your numeristics.
Thanks, but I've really like coin-collecting.
> I also like numbers like
> 720 because I can do the math in my head more easil
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 3:11 AM, Bob W wrote:
> 2, 4, 5, 6, 8,
Who do we appreciate
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/l
It's a lovely hobby.
I am equally impressed by your numeristics. I also like numbers like
720 because I can do the math in my head more easily.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Bob W wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf
On Aug 28, 2011, at 12:11 AM, Bob W wrote:
>>
>
> Purely by coincidence, when I was googling something work-related last week
> I found a website which pointed out that 960 is one of those magic numbers
> like 720 which subdivides into zillions of different whole numbers, namely:
> 2, 3, 4, 5,
> Bloody hell, Bob! Isn't it summer over there? Shouldn't you be
> outdoors doing summer-y things? Perhaps it's raining.
>
"Is it still raining? I hadn't noticed". It's been a long wet summer.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
t
> -Original Message-
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> Joseph McAllister
>
> > Something to consider next time the max dimensions are reviewed.
>
> Good Lord, Bob, you do need a hobby.
Perhaps I should take up photography.
> Thank you, howe
Bloody hell, Bob! Isn't it summer over there? Shouldn't you be
outdoors doing summer-y things? Perhaps it's raining.
However - thanks for the insight. I've placed this discussion in my
'hold' folder for future reference and/or to pass on to the next
PUG-meister should he/she be brave enough to
On Aug 28, 2011, at 00:11 , Bob W wrote:
>> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
>> Brian Walters
>
>> The main requirements are:
>>
>> * Max. pixel dimensions: 800 x 800 pixels
>
> Godfrey mentioned a few weeks ago that pictures on my website seemed quite
> s
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> Brian Walters
> The main requirements are:
>
> * Max. pixel dimensions: 800 x 800 pixels
Godfrey mentioned a few weeks ago that pictures on my website seemed quite
small at 600x400. I orignally chose this when the PUG wa
21 matches
Mail list logo
